Modeling the Forming of Public Opinion: An approach from Sociophysics

Serge Galam
{"title":"Modeling the Forming of Public Opinion: An approach from Sociophysics","authors":"Serge Galam","doi":"10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70002-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reviews a sociophysics two-state model for opinion forming that has proven heuristic power. The dynamics are driven by repeated small-group discussions; within each group, a local majority rule is applied to update the opinions of agents. Iterating the dynamics leads towards one of two opposite attractors at which every agent shares the same opinion. The successful attractor is a function of the initial support with respect to a certain threshold, the value of which depends on the size distribution of the local update groups. While odd-sized groups yield a threshold at fifty percent, even-sized groups, which allow the inclusion of doubt in the case of an opinion tie, produce a threshold shift toward either one of the two attractors, giving rise to minority opinion spreading. In addition, agents can be heterogeneous in their cognitive nature, obeying different rules to update their opinion. While floater agents are open to changing their mind, contrarians chose to oppose whatever opinion was held by the majority of agents in their vicinity, and inflexibles never change their mind. Contrarians and inflexibles have drastic and counter-intuitive effects on the opinion dynamics. Beyond certain critical proportions, contrarians trigger an upside change of the dynamics, making it threshold-less with only one attractor at precisely 50/50 regardless of the initial conditions. Inflexibles produce the same threshold-less dynamics, except with an asymmetric single attractor that favors a specific opinion, even when they start with very low support. The results are used to shed new and unexpected light on controversial issues such as global warming.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 2-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70002-1","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economics and Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340154013700021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

This paper reviews a sociophysics two-state model for opinion forming that has proven heuristic power. The dynamics are driven by repeated small-group discussions; within each group, a local majority rule is applied to update the opinions of agents. Iterating the dynamics leads towards one of two opposite attractors at which every agent shares the same opinion. The successful attractor is a function of the initial support with respect to a certain threshold, the value of which depends on the size distribution of the local update groups. While odd-sized groups yield a threshold at fifty percent, even-sized groups, which allow the inclusion of doubt in the case of an opinion tie, produce a threshold shift toward either one of the two attractors, giving rise to minority opinion spreading. In addition, agents can be heterogeneous in their cognitive nature, obeying different rules to update their opinion. While floater agents are open to changing their mind, contrarians chose to oppose whatever opinion was held by the majority of agents in their vicinity, and inflexibles never change their mind. Contrarians and inflexibles have drastic and counter-intuitive effects on the opinion dynamics. Beyond certain critical proportions, contrarians trigger an upside change of the dynamics, making it threshold-less with only one attractor at precisely 50/50 regardless of the initial conditions. Inflexibles produce the same threshold-less dynamics, except with an asymmetric single attractor that favors a specific opinion, even when they start with very low support. The results are used to shed new and unexpected light on controversial issues such as global warming.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舆论形成的建模:一种来自社会物理学的方法
本文回顾了一个社会物理学的意见形成的双状态模型,它已经证明了启发式的力量。这种动态是由反复的小组讨论驱动的;在每个组中,应用局部多数决规则来更新代理的意见。迭代动力学导致两个相反的吸引子之一,每个代理都有相同的意见。成功的吸引子是初始支持相对于某个阈值的函数,其值取决于本地更新组的大小分布。奇数大小的群体产生的阈值为50%,而偶数大小的群体,允许在意见平局的情况下包含怀疑,产生的阈值向两个吸引子中的一个转移,从而导致少数意见的传播。此外,智能体的认知本质可能是异质的,它们遵循不同的规则来更新自己的观点。浮动型代理人可以随时改变自己的想法,而逆向者则选择反对周围大多数代理人的意见,而固守型代理人从不改变自己的想法。逆势者和顽固不化者对舆论动态有着激烈的、反直觉的影响。超过一定的临界比例,逆势者就会触发动态的上行变化,使其没有阈值,只有一个吸引子,精确地50/50,无论初始条件如何。不灵活的人会产生同样的无阈值动态,除非有一个不对称的单一吸引子支持特定的观点,即使他们一开始的支持率很低。这些结果被用来为全球变暖等有争议的问题提供新的、意想不到的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time for a pause Three decades of strategic management research on M&As: Citations, co-citations, and topics Paying for success: An appraisal of social impact bonds Career aspirations of flexpatriates. A qualitative study Reasons that lead companies to withdraw from interorganizational networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1