Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.001
Curtis Child , Benjamin G. Gibbs , Kristie J. Rowley
A social impact bond is a type of pay-for-success initiative that shifts the financial risks associated with pursuing public purposes to private investors. Governments throughout the world are hopeful that they can be relied on as a politically feasible policy tool for tackling difficult social problems. Despite the excitement surrounding them, there is very little empirical scholarship on social impact bonds. This article takes stock of this new phenomenon, noting the many reasons for their widespread appeal while also raising some concerns that researchers and practitioners would do well to consider before adopting them. We do so by appraising them through the lens of three dimensions: accountability, measurement, and cost-effectiveness. Throughout, we draw comparisons to conventional government contracting.
{"title":"Paying for success: An appraisal of social impact bonds","authors":"Curtis Child , Benjamin G. Gibbs , Kristie J. Rowley","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A social impact bond is a type of pay-for-success initiative that shifts the financial risks associated with pursuing public purposes to private investors. Governments throughout the world are hopeful that they can be relied on as a politically feasible policy tool for tackling difficult social problems. Despite the excitement surrounding them, there is very little empirical scholarship on social impact bonds. This article takes stock of this new phenomenon, noting the many reasons for their widespread appeal while also raising some concerns that researchers and practitioners would do well to consider before adopting them. We do so by appraising them through the lens of three dimensions: accountability, measurement, and cost-effectiveness. Throughout, we draw comparisons to conventional government contracting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75187667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002
Manuel Portugal Ferreira , Nuno Rosa dos Reis , Cláudia Frias Pinto
Merger and acquisitions (M&As) strategies have been growingly deployed by firms for their domestic and international expansion, in order to redefine their business scope or take advantage of emerging opportunities. In this paper we conduct a bibliometric study of the extant strategy research on M&As, assessed by the articles published in the main journal for strategic management studies over the period 1984–2010. Results reveal the highest impact works (articles and books), the intellectual ties among authors and theories that form five main clusters of research, and the topics delved into. Performance effects, M&As as diversification strategies, and resource- and capabilities-based topics have dominated the extant research. The study contributes to the existing knowledge on M&As by taking stock of the accumulated knowledge and research direction, complementing other literature reviews with a strategic management perspective. Thus, we provide a rear view of the field, which facilitates detecting untapped gaps that may provide generous avenues for future research.
{"title":"Three decades of strategic management research on M&As: Citations, co-citations, and topics","authors":"Manuel Portugal Ferreira , Nuno Rosa dos Reis , Cláudia Frias Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Merger and acquisitions (M&As) strategies have been growingly deployed by firms for their domestic and international expansion, in order to redefine their business scope or take advantage of emerging opportunities. In this paper we conduct a bibliometric study of the extant strategy research on M&As, assessed by the articles published in the main journal for strategic management studies over the period 1984–2010. Results reveal the highest impact works (articles and books), the intellectual ties among authors and theories that form five main clusters of research, and the topics delved into. Performance effects, M&As as diversification strategies, and resource- and capabilities-based topics have dominated the extant research. The study contributes to the existing knowledge on M&As by taking stock of the accumulated knowledge and research direction, complementing other literature reviews with a strategic management perspective. Thus, we provide a rear view of the field, which facilitates detecting untapped gaps that may provide generous avenues for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74908744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.002
Barbara Demel , Wolfgang Mayrhofer
This paper analyses the career aspirations of Austrian flexpatriates and expatriates. Conceptually, the article applies a framework using career anchors and internal career orientations. Empirically, we build on a variant of content analysis of 40 semi-structured interviews with 40 Austrian internationally mobile employees working in Eastern and Western European countries. The results show the existence of both traditional and new career aspirations. Most important to our sample are aspirations revolving around Management and Hierarchy, Internationalism and Entrepreneurial Creativity; for flexpatriates we find specifics regarding Freedom, Getting High and a new aspiration referred to as Celebrity; for expatriates particularities concern Balance, Pure Challenge and Skills and Knowledge. Generalizability of our findings is limited due to the interpretative nature of the study, the sample structure, and cross-sectional design.
{"title":"Career aspirations of flexpatriates. A qualitative study","authors":"Barbara Demel , Wolfgang Mayrhofer","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analyses the career aspirations of Austrian flexpatriates and expatriates. Conceptually, the article applies a framework using career anchors and internal career orientations. Empirically, we build on a variant of content analysis of 40 semi-structured interviews with 40 Austrian internationally mobile employees working in Eastern and Western European countries. The results show the existence of both traditional and new career aspirations. Most important to our sample are aspirations revolving around Management and Hierarchy, Internationalism and Entrepreneurial Creativity; for flexpatriates we find specifics regarding Freedom, Getting High and a new aspiration referred to as Celebrity; for expatriates particularities concern Balance, Pure Challenge and Skills and Knowledge. Generalizability of our findings is limited due to the interpretative nature of the study, the sample structure, and cross-sectional design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.12.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78028564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.11.001
Leander Luiz Klein, Breno Augusto Diniz Pereira
The cooperation of companies in networks is a strategy used by managers to act in their business sector, aiming to add more value to their companies and create competitive advantage. The literature on this topic exposes many benefits of acting collaboratively in networks, but little is known about the factors that lead companies to withdraw from horizontal networks. This paper aims to investigate which factors drive companies to leave interorganizational networks. In order to do this, we conducted a qualitative research with seven interorganizational networks from which companies were withdrawing. Data was collected by interviewing the presidents of these seven networks and the owners of 11 companies that withdrew from them. The results outline a set of factors that lead companies to leave networks. Among the most cited are: lack of criteria for member selection, lack of trust, lack of commitment, and opportunism and individualism of some of the members. We concluded that most of these factors are intrinsically related and result in limiting the potential of the network to add value and obtain higher possibilities of competitive advantage for its members.
{"title":"Reasons that lead companies to withdraw from interorganizational networks","authors":"Leander Luiz Klein, Breno Augusto Diniz Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cooperation of companies in networks is a strategy used by managers to act in their business sector, aiming to add more value to their companies and create competitive advantage. The literature on this topic exposes many benefits of acting collaboratively in networks, but little is known about the factors that lead companies to withdraw from horizontal networks. This paper aims to investigate which factors drive companies to leave interorganizational networks. In order to do this, we conducted a qualitative research with seven interorganizational networks from which companies were withdrawing. Data was collected by interviewing the presidents of these seven networks and the owners of 11 companies that withdrew from them. The results outline a set of factors that lead companies to leave networks. Among the most cited are: lack of criteria for member selection, lack of trust, lack of commitment, and opportunism and individualism of some of the members. We concluded that most of these factors are intrinsically related and result in limiting the potential of the network to add value and obtain higher possibilities of competitive advantage for its members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 2-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.11.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79698930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.07.001
Claudia Nagel
Behavioural strategy deals with strategic management from a psychologically informed perspective, integrating emotional aspects in strategic management. Strategic situations can be characterised by a high level of uncertainty, based on the unforeseeable nature of the future and the paradoxical nature of underlying seemingly conflicting choices. Both entail human emotional reactions such as fear and anxiety. Therefore, the micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities theory should pay more attention on the study of fear in the strategic decision-making process. Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy have long-term experience in researching these emotions, such that psychodynamic theory can help with understanding their influences on the thoughts and feelings of the manager, the management team, and the organisation in the process of strategy making.
Using the psychodynamic lens in the field of behavioural strategy presents a new and fairly neglected avenue for exploring the more unconscious, ‘deep foundations’ of dynamic capabilities resting on the strategizing manager, the top decision-making team, and the implementing organisation. The three generic dynamic capabilities developed by Teece et al. (1997) and Teece (2007), sensing, seizing and reconfiguring, provide a framework for developing a process-oriented perspective for creating corporate strategy, so that the foundations of dynamic capabilities can be reworked and complemented within this framework. This will also enable the operationalisation of success factors for dynamic capabilities from a psychodynamic perspective and creates opportunities for future research.
行为策略从心理角度处理战略管理,将情感方面整合到战略管理中。战略形势的特点是高度不确定性,这是基于未来的不可预见性质和潜在的看似相互冲突的选择的矛盾性质。两者都涉及人类的情绪反应,如恐惧和焦虑。因此,动态能力理论的微观基础应该更加重视对战略决策过程中的恐惧的研究。精神分析和心理治疗在研究这些情绪方面有着长期的经验,因此心理动力学理论可以帮助理解它们在战略制定过程中对管理者、管理团队和组织的思想和感受的影响。在行为策略领域使用心理动力学的视角,为探索更多无意识的动态能力的“深层基础”提供了一条相当被忽视的新途径,这些动态能力依赖于战略管理者、最高决策团队和实施组织。由Teece et al.(1997)和Teece(2007)提出的三种通用动态能力,即感知、把握和重新配置,为制定企业战略提供了一个以过程为导向的视角框架,这样动态能力的基础就可以在这个框架内重新设计和补充。从心理动力学的角度来看,这也将使动态能力的成功因素得以实施,并为未来的研究创造机会。
{"title":"Behavioural strategy and deep foundations of dynamic capabilities – Using psychodynamic concepts to better deal with uncertainty and paradoxical choices in strategic management","authors":"Claudia Nagel","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Behavioural strategy deals with strategic management from a psychologically informed perspective, integrating emotional aspects in strategic management. Strategic situations can be characterised by a high level of uncertainty, based on the unforeseeable nature of the future and the paradoxical nature of underlying seemingly conflicting choices. Both entail human emotional reactions such as fear and anxiety. Therefore, the micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities theory should pay more attention on the study of fear in the strategic decision-making process. Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy have long-term experience in researching these emotions, such that </span>psychodynamic theory can help with understanding their influences on the thoughts and feelings of the manager, the management team, and the organisation in the process of strategy making.</p><p>Using the psychodynamic lens in the field of behavioural strategy presents a new and fairly neglected avenue for exploring the more unconscious, ‘deep foundations’ of dynamic capabilities resting on the strategizing manager, the top decision-making team, and the implementing organisation. The three generic dynamic capabilities developed by <span>Teece et al. (1997)</span> and <span>Teece (2007)</span>, sensing, seizing and reconfiguring, provide a framework for developing a process-oriented perspective for creating corporate strategy, so that the foundations of dynamic capabilities can be reworked and complemented within this framework. This will also enable the operationalisation of success factors for dynamic capabilities from a psychodynamic perspective and creates opportunities for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 46-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2016.07.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88472983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-01DOI: 10.1016/J.GEMREV.2015.07.001
T. Keiningham, A. Buoye, Joan Ball
{"title":"Competitive context is everything: Moving from absolute to relative metrics","authors":"T. Keiningham, A. Buoye, Joan Ball","doi":"10.1016/J.GEMREV.2015.07.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEMREV.2015.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77414107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.07.001
Timothy L. Keiningham , Alexander Buoye , Joan Ball
This research informs management theory and practice concerning the efficacy of utilizing relative metrics to link consumer perceptions and attitudes and to share of wallet. The article starts with a brief discussion of the theoretical foundations for a shift from absolute to relative metrics. We then compare and contrast absolute satisfaction and relative “ranked” satisfaction data from 1714 consumers from nine countries in a banking context and report preliminary insights from a small-scale qualitative study. The results conclusively demonstrate the superiority of relative ranked satisfaction to absolute satisfaction measures in this context and, for the first time, point to statistically significant country-specific effects when linking relative satisfaction to share of wallet. We also discuss how researchers and managers might use perceptual and attitudinal metrics if the goal is linkage to customers’ buying behaviors.
{"title":"Competitive context is everything: Moving from absolute to relative metrics","authors":"Timothy L. Keiningham , Alexander Buoye , Joan Ball","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.07.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research informs management theory and practice concerning the efficacy of utilizing relative metrics to link consumer perceptions and attitudes and to share of wallet. The article starts with a brief discussion of the theoretical foundations for a shift from absolute to relative metrics. We then compare and contrast absolute satisfaction and relative “ranked” satisfaction data from 1714 consumers from nine countries in a banking context and report preliminary insights from a small-scale qualitative study. The results conclusively demonstrate the superiority of relative ranked satisfaction to absolute satisfaction measures in this context and, for the first time, point to statistically significant country-specific effects when linking relative satisfaction to share of wallet. We also discuss how researchers and managers might use perceptual and attitudinal metrics if the goal is linkage to customers’ buying behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages 18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.07.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91719248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-01DOI: 10.1016/J.GEMREV.2015.11.001
B. Edvardsson
{"title":"Invited Commentary – Relative or absolute measures and metrics: That is the question?","authors":"B. Edvardsson","doi":"10.1016/J.GEMREV.2015.11.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEMREV.2015.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"26-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78619960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}