Using a Panel of Heat Shock Proteins for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Breast Cancer

Ebtsam R. Zaher, Mahmoud A. Hemida, Mohammad M. El-Hashash, H. El-Sheridy
{"title":"Using a Panel of Heat Shock Proteins for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Breast Cancer","authors":"Ebtsam R. Zaher, Mahmoud A. Hemida, Mohammad M. El-Hashash, H. El-Sheridy","doi":"10.12691/JCRT-6-2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The current work aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of a panel of heat shock proteins; HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90, in sera of breast cancer patients, in comparison with CA 15.3 as the standard marker in breast cancer management. Methodology: The study included 248 females diagnosed with primary breast cancer and 232 normal healthy females. Patients were managed by modified radical mastectomy or breast conservative surgery then received adjuvant therapy and clinically followed up for 5 years. In sera of all patients and controls; HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 were measured by ELISA while CA 15.3 was measured by IRMA. Findings: Pre-treatment serum levels of HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 were significantly elevated in breast cancer patients than in controls, furthermore, they were significant as diagnostic markers, especially when using a panel of HSP70≥9.2 ng/ml and HSP60≥7.5 ng/ml with AUC, sensitivity and specificity of 0.995, 98% and 95%; respectively. As prognostic markers, patients with elevated serum HSP27, HSP60 or HSP70 had significantly lower DFS than patients having lower serum levels. In addition, in patients with at least two HSPs of the three above their cutoffs, the HR increased to 4.65, and it jumped to 17.88 for patients having all three HSPs elevated above their respective cutoff values. CA 15.3 was not significant as diagnostic or prognostic marker. Conclusion: A panel of pre-treatment serum HSP70≥9.2 ng/ml and HSP60≥7.5 ng/ml may be useful for screening of populations at high risk of developing breast cancer. For prediction of treatment response, patients who have elevated pre-treatment serum HSP27, HSP60 or HSP70 had significantly lower DFS. In addition, the risk of relapse in patients having at least two HSPs and patients having all three HSPs elevated above their respective cutoffs were 4.65-times and 17.88-times that of patients with HSPs below their respective cutoffs.","PeriodicalId":22619,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/JCRT-6-2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The current work aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of a panel of heat shock proteins; HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90, in sera of breast cancer patients, in comparison with CA 15.3 as the standard marker in breast cancer management. Methodology: The study included 248 females diagnosed with primary breast cancer and 232 normal healthy females. Patients were managed by modified radical mastectomy or breast conservative surgery then received adjuvant therapy and clinically followed up for 5 years. In sera of all patients and controls; HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 were measured by ELISA while CA 15.3 was measured by IRMA. Findings: Pre-treatment serum levels of HSP27, HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90 were significantly elevated in breast cancer patients than in controls, furthermore, they were significant as diagnostic markers, especially when using a panel of HSP70≥9.2 ng/ml and HSP60≥7.5 ng/ml with AUC, sensitivity and specificity of 0.995, 98% and 95%; respectively. As prognostic markers, patients with elevated serum HSP27, HSP60 or HSP70 had significantly lower DFS than patients having lower serum levels. In addition, in patients with at least two HSPs of the three above their cutoffs, the HR increased to 4.65, and it jumped to 17.88 for patients having all three HSPs elevated above their respective cutoff values. CA 15.3 was not significant as diagnostic or prognostic marker. Conclusion: A panel of pre-treatment serum HSP70≥9.2 ng/ml and HSP60≥7.5 ng/ml may be useful for screening of populations at high risk of developing breast cancer. For prediction of treatment response, patients who have elevated pre-treatment serum HSP27, HSP60 or HSP70 had significantly lower DFS. In addition, the risk of relapse in patients having at least two HSPs and patients having all three HSPs elevated above their respective cutoffs were 4.65-times and 17.88-times that of patients with HSPs below their respective cutoffs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热休克蛋白组在乳腺癌诊断和预后中的应用
目的:本研究旨在评估一组热休克蛋白的诊断和预后作用;乳腺癌患者血清中HSP27、HSP60、HSP70、HSP90与ca15.3作为乳腺癌治疗标准标志物的比较。方法:本研究纳入248名诊断为原发性乳腺癌的女性和232名正常健康女性。患者均行改良根治术或乳房保守手术后辅助治疗,临床随访5年。在所有患者和对照组的血清中;ELISA法检测HSP27、HSP60、HSP70、HSP90, IRMA法检测CA 15.3。结果:乳腺癌患者治疗前血清HSP27、HSP60、HSP70、HSP90水平均显著高于对照组,且作为诊断指标具有显著意义,尤其是以HSP70≥9.2 ng/ml、HSP60≥7.5 ng/ml为检测指标,AUC、敏感性和特异性分别为0.995、98%和95%;分别。作为预后指标,血清HSP27、HSP60或HSP70升高的患者的DFS明显低于血清水平较低的患者。此外,在三个HSPs中至少有两个高于其截止值的患者中,HR增加到4.65,而在三个HSPs均高于其各自截止值的患者中,HR增加到17.88。ca15.3作为诊断或预后指标无显著意义。结论:治疗前血清HSP70≥9.2 ng/ml和HSP60≥7.5 ng/ml可用于乳腺癌高危人群的筛查。对于治疗反应的预测,治疗前血清HSP27、HSP60或HSP70升高的患者的DFS显著降低。此外,至少有两种HSPs和三种HSPs均高于各自临界值的患者的复发风险分别是低于各自临界值的患者的4.65倍和17.88倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of alternative approaches of primary cervical cancer screening among women in low-income environments Impact of an Educational Program on Sexual Dysfunction Associated With Cervical Cancer Self-Knowledge among Women with Cervical Cancer Open the Therapeutic Revolution Door of Antiviral Antitumor by Improving Systemic Non-Specific Immunity A Case of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Ph+AML) of Primary Drug Resistance and Relevant Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1