Investor Financial Literacy in the Workplace

Jill E. Fisch, Tess Wilkinson‐Ryan, Krin Irvine
{"title":"Investor Financial Literacy in the Workplace","authors":"Jill E. Fisch, Tess Wilkinson‐Ryan, Krin Irvine","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2865884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dramatic shift from traditional pension plans to participantdirected 401(k) plans has increased the decision-making responsibility of individual investors for their own retirement planning. With this shift comes increasing evidence that investors are making poor decisions in choosing how much to save for retirement and in selecting among their investment options. Studies question the value of efforts to improve these decisions through regulatory reforms or investor education. This article posits that deficiencies in workplace retirement savings cannot be adequately addressed until the reasons for poor investment decisions are better understood. We report the results of an exploratory study that asked subjects to complete a simulated retirement investment task and collected information about their financial knowledge and preferences. The study enabled us to measure financial literacy and evaluate its relationship to retirement investment decision-making. In line with existing research, we found a strong relationship between financial literacy and successful retirement investing. Our results suggest, however, that the relevant understanding in this context is not about math so much as it is a basic knowledge of the relative costs and benefits of the major investment categories. Finally, we present results suggesting that financial literacy is separate from investment preferences - specifically, that tolerance for risk is a separate and highly predictive variable in estimating retirement planning success. Our research suggests that individual employees are likely to lack the skills necessary to support the current regulatory model of participant-directed retirement investing. The structure and regulation of retirement plans ought to take this fact seriously. We explore the potential for investor education and professional advice, respectively, to overcome the limitations of individualized choice.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2865884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dramatic shift from traditional pension plans to participantdirected 401(k) plans has increased the decision-making responsibility of individual investors for their own retirement planning. With this shift comes increasing evidence that investors are making poor decisions in choosing how much to save for retirement and in selecting among their investment options. Studies question the value of efforts to improve these decisions through regulatory reforms or investor education. This article posits that deficiencies in workplace retirement savings cannot be adequately addressed until the reasons for poor investment decisions are better understood. We report the results of an exploratory study that asked subjects to complete a simulated retirement investment task and collected information about their financial knowledge and preferences. The study enabled us to measure financial literacy and evaluate its relationship to retirement investment decision-making. In line with existing research, we found a strong relationship between financial literacy and successful retirement investing. Our results suggest, however, that the relevant understanding in this context is not about math so much as it is a basic knowledge of the relative costs and benefits of the major investment categories. Finally, we present results suggesting that financial literacy is separate from investment preferences - specifically, that tolerance for risk is a separate and highly predictive variable in estimating retirement planning success. Our research suggests that individual employees are likely to lack the skills necessary to support the current regulatory model of participant-directed retirement investing. The structure and regulation of retirement plans ought to take this fact seriously. We explore the potential for investor education and professional advice, respectively, to overcome the limitations of individualized choice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职场投资者的财务素养
从传统养老金计划到参与式401(k)计划的巨大转变,增加了个人投资者对自己退休计划的决策责任。随着这种转变,越来越多的证据表明,投资者在选择为退休储蓄多少以及在投资选择中做出了糟糕的决定。研究对通过监管改革或投资者教育来改善这些决策的价值提出了质疑。本文认为,在更好地理解不良投资决策的原因之前,职场退休储蓄的不足无法得到充分解决。我们报告了一项探索性研究的结果,该研究要求受试者完成一个模拟的退休投资任务,并收集了他们的金融知识和偏好信息。该研究使我们能够衡量财务素养并评估其与退休投资决策的关系。与现有的研究一致,我们发现理财知识与成功的退休投资之间存在很强的关系。然而,我们的结果表明,在这种情况下,相关的理解与其说是关于数学,不如说是关于主要投资类别的相对成本和收益的基本知识。最后,我们提出的结果表明,金融素养与投资偏好是分开的——具体来说,风险容忍度是估计退休计划成功的一个独立且高度可预测的变量。我们的研究表明,个别员工可能缺乏必要的技能,以支持当前的监管模式的参与式退休投资。退休计划的结构和监管应该认真对待这一事实。我们分别探讨了投资者教育和专业建议的潜力,以克服个性化选择的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Proposal for Taking the Complexities Out of Taxing U.S. Retirement Distributions to Foreign Nationals Do Social Movements Spur Corporate Change? The Rise of “MeToo Termination Rights” in CEO Contracts Rules of Medical Necessity Does Employee Ownership Reduce Strike Risk? Evidence from U.S. Union Elections All that Glitters Is not Gold. Effects of Working from Home on Income Inequality at the Time of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1