Time-Varying Energy and Stock Market Integration in Asia

J. Batten, Harald Kinateder, Peter G. Szilagyi, N. Wagner
{"title":"Time-Varying Energy and Stock Market Integration in Asia","authors":"J. Batten, Harald Kinateder, Peter G. Szilagyi, N. Wagner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2961688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The degree of integration between energy and stock markets is critical for the diversification, risk management and funding decisions of global corporations and investors alike. We investigate the integration relation between ten major Asian stock markets and a diversified energy portfolio that comprises oil, coal and gas. Estimation of the relation in a time-varying asset pricing framework, which allows for regime switching, identifies two major regimes. The first regime represents periods of low energy-stock market integration, where markets tend to be segmented. It accounts for over two-thirds of the sample period during December 1992 to December 2015. The second regime represents periods of high integration, as characterized by limited diversification opportunities and increased levels of volatility. Also, corporate funding conditions are less favorable in the second regime. The two regimes differ in the way equity markets price energy risk. In addition to a positive energy-unrelated equity risk premium during the low integration regime, our results identify a significant positive energy-related equity risk premium during the high integration regime. Finally, we demonstrate that investors can use the conditional information of our integration model to outperform passive portfolio investment strategies in the stock and energy markets.","PeriodicalId":12584,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2961688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

The degree of integration between energy and stock markets is critical for the diversification, risk management and funding decisions of global corporations and investors alike. We investigate the integration relation between ten major Asian stock markets and a diversified energy portfolio that comprises oil, coal and gas. Estimation of the relation in a time-varying asset pricing framework, which allows for regime switching, identifies two major regimes. The first regime represents periods of low energy-stock market integration, where markets tend to be segmented. It accounts for over two-thirds of the sample period during December 1992 to December 2015. The second regime represents periods of high integration, as characterized by limited diversification opportunities and increased levels of volatility. Also, corporate funding conditions are less favorable in the second regime. The two regimes differ in the way equity markets price energy risk. In addition to a positive energy-unrelated equity risk premium during the low integration regime, our results identify a significant positive energy-related equity risk premium during the high integration regime. Finally, we demonstrate that investors can use the conditional information of our integration model to outperform passive portfolio investment strategies in the stock and energy markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲时变能源与股票市场整合
能源和股票市场之间的一体化程度对全球公司和投资者的多样化、风险管理和筹资决策至关重要。我们研究了亚洲十大股票市场与包括石油、煤炭和天然气在内的多元化能源投资组合之间的整合关系。在一个时变的资产定价框架中对关系的估计,允许制度切换,确定了两个主要制度。第一种模式代表低能源库存市场整合的时期,在这个时期,市场往往是分割的。在1992年12月至2015年12月的样本期内,它占了三分之二以上。第二种制度代表高度一体化的时期,其特点是多样化机会有限,波动性增加。此外,第二种制度下的企业融资条件也不那么有利。这两种机制在股票市场为能源风险定价的方式上有所不同。除了在低整合机制下与能源无关的股票风险溢价为正外,我们的研究结果还发现,在高整合机制下,与能源相关的股票风险溢价显著为正。最后,我们证明了投资者可以利用我们的整合模型的条件信息在股票和能源市场上优于被动组合投资策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manufacturer Encroachment in a Product Market and Common Ownership between Supply Chain Parties WTO आणि ग्रामीण विकासात कृषी (Agriculture in the WTO and Rural Development) Mechanics of Global Value Chains: India's Perspective A Block-Chain of Things (BcoT) Based System for Detecting Counterfeit Products in Supply Chain Management Are commodity futures a hedge against inflation? A Markov-switching approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1