Book Review: Equipping Technical Communicators for Social Justice Work: Theories, Methodologies, and Pedagogies by R. Walton & G. Y. Agboka (Eds.)

Rosanna M. Vail
{"title":"Book Review: Equipping Technical Communicators for Social Justice Work: Theories, Methodologies, and Pedagogies by R. Walton & G. Y. Agboka (Eds.)","authors":"Rosanna M. Vail","doi":"10.1177/00472816221112860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social justice “turn” in technical and professional communication (TPC) began shifting the field from a focus on “mere ethics, which often exist in an individual’s character or behavior,” to one with “a social justice stance, which tends to be more collective and action oriented” (Jones, 2016, p. 211). Laying the groundwork for engaging TPC and social justice, scholars and practitioners are increasingly drawing upon theoretical approaches and heuristics that better position technical communicators as advocates and coalitions for action (Jones, 2016; Walton et al., 2019). From book collections of social justice-oriented pedagogies (Haas & Eble, 2018) to examinations of researcher positionality, power, and privilege (Jones et al., 2016; Walton et al., 2019), TPC scholars are focusing more explicitly on how to address complex problems of systemic injustice still rampant in the everyday sites of TPC work (Agboka, 2021; Walton et al., 2019). Furthering the trajectory of how to “do” socially just work in TPC, Equipping Technical Communicators for Social Justice Work: Theories, Methodologies, and Pedagogies, edited by Rebecca Walton and Godwin Y. Agboka, offers narratives, reflections, tools, and heuristics to prepare academic and practitioner readers to move beyond understandings of oppression and toward advocacy and action. The collection features an introduction, 12 chapters separated into four sections (“Section I: Centering Marginality in Professional Practice,” “Section II: Conducting Collaborative Research,” “Section III: Teaching Critical Analysis,” and “Section IV: Teaching Critical Advocacy”), and an afterword. Each component offers innovative and practical ways to implement socially just approaches in TPC. The first section, “Centering Marginality in Professional Practice,” highlights intersectionality and inclusivity of lived experiences and community participation as Book Review","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"69 1","pages":"493 - 497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816221112860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social justice “turn” in technical and professional communication (TPC) began shifting the field from a focus on “mere ethics, which often exist in an individual’s character or behavior,” to one with “a social justice stance, which tends to be more collective and action oriented” (Jones, 2016, p. 211). Laying the groundwork for engaging TPC and social justice, scholars and practitioners are increasingly drawing upon theoretical approaches and heuristics that better position technical communicators as advocates and coalitions for action (Jones, 2016; Walton et al., 2019). From book collections of social justice-oriented pedagogies (Haas & Eble, 2018) to examinations of researcher positionality, power, and privilege (Jones et al., 2016; Walton et al., 2019), TPC scholars are focusing more explicitly on how to address complex problems of systemic injustice still rampant in the everyday sites of TPC work (Agboka, 2021; Walton et al., 2019). Furthering the trajectory of how to “do” socially just work in TPC, Equipping Technical Communicators for Social Justice Work: Theories, Methodologies, and Pedagogies, edited by Rebecca Walton and Godwin Y. Agboka, offers narratives, reflections, tools, and heuristics to prepare academic and practitioner readers to move beyond understandings of oppression and toward advocacy and action. The collection features an introduction, 12 chapters separated into four sections (“Section I: Centering Marginality in Professional Practice,” “Section II: Conducting Collaborative Research,” “Section III: Teaching Critical Analysis,” and “Section IV: Teaching Critical Advocacy”), and an afterword. Each component offers innovative and practical ways to implement socially just approaches in TPC. The first section, “Centering Marginality in Professional Practice,” highlights intersectionality and inclusivity of lived experiences and community participation as Book Review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:为社会正义工作装备技术传播者:理论,方法和教学法,作者:R. Walton & G. Y. Agboka(编辑)
技术和专业传播(TPC)中的社会正义“转向”开始将该领域的重点从“仅仅存在于个人性格或行为中的道德”转向“社会正义立场,往往更倾向于集体和行动导向”(Jones, 2016,第211页)。为参与TPC和社会正义奠定基础,学者和实践者越来越多地利用理论方法和启发式,更好地将技术传播者定位为行动的倡导者和联盟(Jones, 2016;Walton et al., 2019)。从以社会正义为导向的教育学的藏书(Haas & Eble, 2018)到对研究人员地位、权力和特权的考察(Jones et al., 2016;Walton等人,2019),TPC学者更明确地关注如何解决在TPC工作的日常场所中仍然猖獗的系统性不公正的复杂问题(Agboka, 2021;Walton et al., 2019)。Rebecca Walton和Godwin Y. Agboka编辑的《为社会正义工作装备技术传播者:理论、方法和教学法》进一步阐述了如何在TPC中“做”社会正义工作的轨迹,该书提供了叙述、反思、工具和启发,帮助学术和实践读者超越对压迫的理解,走向倡导和行动。本书包括引言、12章,分为四部分(“第一部分:专业实践中的边缘性”、“第二部分:开展合作研究”、“第三部分:批判性分析教学”和“第四部分:批判性倡导教学”),以及后记。每个组成部分都提供了在TPC中实施社会公正方法的创新和实用方法。第一部分“专业实践中的边缘性”强调了生活经验和社区参与作为书评的交叉性和包容性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simply Effective? Simplified User Interfaces in Software Tutorials Improving ChatGPT's Competency in Generating Effective Business Communication Messages: Integrating Rhetorical Genre Analysis into Prompting Techniques Asking is Hard: Appeals Language in Kickstarter Crowdfunding Campaigns Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1