Kellő védelmet biztosít-e az Ebktv. a munkaerőpiacon a gyermekvállaláshoz?

Zoltán Földvári
{"title":"Kellő védelmet biztosít-e az Ebktv. a munkaerőpiacon a gyermekvállaláshoz?","authors":"Zoltán Földvári","doi":"10.24169/DJM/2020/3-4/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent years, there were several government programs in Hungary aiming to boost the number of childbirths, mainly through direct financial support for parents. But undertaking the commitment to raise a child is not just a financial issue for parents, and especially women. The work – life balance is just as important for many, especially for college-educated ones.\nMy paper aims to examine the legal framework of the equal treatment focused on the abovementioned situation, about how it can prevent the discrimination of pregnant women and parents in the workforce. I briefly look at the legal development of the area in the European Union, and the most relevant issues and procedural questions in the Hungarian Act CXXV of 2003 on equal treatment and the promotion of equal opportunities. For the main part of the paper, I focus on the case law of the Equal Treatment Authority, on how certain conducts (direct or indirect discrimination, harassment, victimization) surface in relation to childbearing and child raising, how did the Authority decide in these cases, and how do these decisions affect the practice of this field. The Kuria is also a substantial actor in this area, as the highest court in the country, its binding uniformity decisions hold significant weight for the law of equal treatment, therefore I examine some of its important decisions.\nIn the end, I summarize my findings. In today’s labor market, pregnant women and parents face discrimination, this is especially true for pregnant women on probationary period. Employers feel burdened if an employee gets pregnant, and in some cases, they still try to lay off women who do not put their career ahead of family. Overall, I conclude that the legal framework is satisfactory, but several underlying social issues will continue to generate obstacles if the employers’ and society’s view about motherhood and roles in the family will not change.","PeriodicalId":11442,"journal":{"name":"Dwight's Journal of Music","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dwight's Journal of Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24169/DJM/2020/3-4/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent years, there were several government programs in Hungary aiming to boost the number of childbirths, mainly through direct financial support for parents. But undertaking the commitment to raise a child is not just a financial issue for parents, and especially women. The work – life balance is just as important for many, especially for college-educated ones. My paper aims to examine the legal framework of the equal treatment focused on the abovementioned situation, about how it can prevent the discrimination of pregnant women and parents in the workforce. I briefly look at the legal development of the area in the European Union, and the most relevant issues and procedural questions in the Hungarian Act CXXV of 2003 on equal treatment and the promotion of equal opportunities. For the main part of the paper, I focus on the case law of the Equal Treatment Authority, on how certain conducts (direct or indirect discrimination, harassment, victimization) surface in relation to childbearing and child raising, how did the Authority decide in these cases, and how do these decisions affect the practice of this field. The Kuria is also a substantial actor in this area, as the highest court in the country, its binding uniformity decisions hold significant weight for the law of equal treatment, therefore I examine some of its important decisions. In the end, I summarize my findings. In today’s labor market, pregnant women and parents face discrimination, this is especially true for pregnant women on probationary period. Employers feel burdened if an employee gets pregnant, and in some cases, they still try to lay off women who do not put their career ahead of family. Overall, I conclude that the legal framework is satisfactory, but several underlying social issues will continue to generate obstacles if the employers’ and society’s view about motherhood and roles in the family will not change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近年来,匈牙利有几个旨在提高生育数量的政府项目,主要是通过对父母的直接财政支持。但对父母来说,承担抚养孩子的责任不仅仅是一个经济问题,尤其是对女性来说。工作与生活的平衡对很多人来说同样重要,尤其是受过大学教育的人。我的论文旨在研究针对上述情况的平等待遇的法律框架,关于它如何防止对孕妇和父母在劳动力中的歧视。我简要地回顾了该领域在欧盟的法律发展,以及2003年匈牙利关于平等待遇和促进平等机会的CXXV法案中最相关的问题和程序问题。对于论文的主要部分,我将重点放在平等待遇管理局的判例法上,关于某些行为(直接或间接歧视,骚扰,受害)如何与生育和抚养子女有关,当局如何在这些案件中作出决定,以及这些决定如何影响这一领域的实践。库里亚也是这一领域的重要参与者,作为该国最高法院,其具有约束力的统一性决定对平等待遇法具有重要意义,因此我研究了它的一些重要决定。最后,我总结了我的发现。在当今的劳动力市场上,孕妇和父母都面临着歧视,这对于处于试用期的孕妇来说尤其如此。如果员工怀孕,雇主会感到负担,在某些情况下,他们仍然试图解雇那些不把事业放在家庭前面的女性。总的来说,我的结论是,法律框架是令人满意的,但如果雇主和社会对母亲和家庭角色的看法不改变,一些潜在的社会问题将继续产生障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
El nino index prediction model using quantile mapping approach on sea surface temperature data Confidence interval estimation of gamma distribution lifetime data using score and bootstrap methods tisztességtelen kereskedelmi gyakorlatok szabályozása és joggyakorlata Lengyelországban fogyasztói adásvétel egyes kérdéseinek szabályozása és joggyakorlata Romániában fogyasztói adásvétel egyes kérdéseinek szabályozása és joggyakorlata Szlovákiában
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1