A systematic meta-review of hypnosis as an empirically supported treatment for pain

R. Hawkins
{"title":"A systematic meta-review of hypnosis as an empirically supported treatment for pain","authors":"R. Hawkins","doi":"10.1191/0968130201PR175RA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A newly developed methodological technique (the systematic meta-review) was applied to determine whether hypnosis is an empirically supported treatment for pain. This involved, initially, a systematic search of the published literature for review studies. These reviews were then subjected to a validated quality scale. There was sufficient evidence of good quality to allow the conclusion that hypnosis does have demonstrable efficacy in the treatment of pain. The only meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia1 showed that 'the average participant treated with hypnosis demonstrated greater analgesic response that 75% of participants in standard and no-treatment control groups' (p. 143). The hypothesis that poor-quality reviews are more likely to produce positive conclusions was not supported. A citation database of all reviews has been assembled and can be extended with time.","PeriodicalId":90719,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in pain","volume":"25 1","pages":"47-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/0968130201PR175RA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

A newly developed methodological technique (the systematic meta-review) was applied to determine whether hypnosis is an empirically supported treatment for pain. This involved, initially, a systematic search of the published literature for review studies. These reviews were then subjected to a validated quality scale. There was sufficient evidence of good quality to allow the conclusion that hypnosis does have demonstrable efficacy in the treatment of pain. The only meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia1 showed that 'the average participant treated with hypnosis demonstrated greater analgesic response that 75% of participants in standard and no-treatment control groups' (p. 143). The hypothesis that poor-quality reviews are more likely to produce positive conclusions was not supported. A citation database of all reviews has been assembled and can be extended with time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠作为一种经验支持的治疗疼痛的系统元综述
一种新开发的方法技术(系统元评价)被应用于确定催眠是否是一种经验支持的治疗疼痛的方法。最初,这包括系统地检索已发表的文献以进行综述研究。然后,这些评论被纳入一个经过验证的质量量表。有足够的证据表明,催眠在治疗疼痛方面确实有明显的疗效。唯一一项关于催眠诱导镇痛的荟萃分析显示,“接受催眠治疗的平均参与者表现出比标准对照组和未接受治疗对照组中75%的参与者更强的镇痛反应”(第143页)。低质量评论更有可能得出积极结论的假设没有得到支持。所有评论的引文数据库已经组装起来,并且可以随着时间的推移而扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Persistent dento-alveolar pain disorder (PDAP): Working towards a better understanding. Facet joint injections in the management of chronic low back pain: a review Solicitousness and chronic pain: a critical review Psychological treatments for chronic low back pain: Past, present, and beyond Musgrave–Mitchell–Charcot neuroarthropathy: a review and hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1