Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations of Voice in Speech and Language Pathologists with Vocal Fatigue.

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Text and Performance Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-04048-x
Rezvane Nayebian, Akbar Darouie, Arezoo Hasanvand, Mohsen Vahedi
{"title":"Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations of Voice in Speech and Language Pathologists with Vocal Fatigue.","authors":"Rezvane Nayebian, Akbar Darouie, Arezoo Hasanvand, Mohsen Vahedi","doi":"10.1007/s12070-023-04048-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vocal fatigue is known as a hyperfunctional voice disorder that can lead to other conditions, such as muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). Speech and language pathologists (SLPs) are professional voice users who may suffer from vocal fatigue due to heavy vocal demands. This study aimed at investigating the cepstral and perceptual dimensions of voice and their correlation in the SLPs with vocal fatigue. Twenty-six SLPs and senior speech therapy students (mean age = 27.11 ± 6.8 yrs), including men (n = 5) and women (n = 21), participated in this descriptive cross-sectional study. They had vocal fatigue according to the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI). In acoustic assessment, cepstral analysis (CPP and CPPS) was performed using <i>Praat</i> software. The Persian version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was used to evaluate the overall severity of dysphonia. The correlation between these two evaluations was also investigated using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 23. Results revealed that the mean CPPS (13.716 ± 2.084) was lower than the cutoff point. Perceptual findings indicated that the mean overall severity (10.557 ± 11.210) fell in the normal variability of voice quality (NVVQ) range. In addition, cepstral and perceptual evaluations had no significant correlation (<i>P</i> > 0/05). The findings showed that auditory-perceptual evaluation considered the gold standard method of voice evaluation, cannot solely identify vocal fatigue. However, cepstral measures can help provide a more objective profile of vocal function in SLPs with vocal fatigue. Therefore, both of these evaluations are recommended for voice assessment of vocal fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":46504,"journal":{"name":"Text and Performance Quarterly","volume":"33 1","pages":"3696-3702"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Text and Performance Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04048-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vocal fatigue is known as a hyperfunctional voice disorder that can lead to other conditions, such as muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). Speech and language pathologists (SLPs) are professional voice users who may suffer from vocal fatigue due to heavy vocal demands. This study aimed at investigating the cepstral and perceptual dimensions of voice and their correlation in the SLPs with vocal fatigue. Twenty-six SLPs and senior speech therapy students (mean age = 27.11 ± 6.8 yrs), including men (n = 5) and women (n = 21), participated in this descriptive cross-sectional study. They had vocal fatigue according to the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI). In acoustic assessment, cepstral analysis (CPP and CPPS) was performed using Praat software. The Persian version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was used to evaluate the overall severity of dysphonia. The correlation between these two evaluations was also investigated using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 23. Results revealed that the mean CPPS (13.716 ± 2.084) was lower than the cutoff point. Perceptual findings indicated that the mean overall severity (10.557 ± 11.210) fell in the normal variability of voice quality (NVVQ) range. In addition, cepstral and perceptual evaluations had no significant correlation (P > 0/05). The findings showed that auditory-perceptual evaluation considered the gold standard method of voice evaluation, cannot solely identify vocal fatigue. However, cepstral measures can help provide a more objective profile of vocal function in SLPs with vocal fatigue. Therefore, both of these evaluations are recommended for voice assessment of vocal fatigue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声带疲劳的语言病理学家的声的倒侧和知觉研究。
声音疲劳被认为是一种功能亢进的声音障碍,它会导致其他疾病,比如肌肉紧张性发声障碍(MTD)。语音和语言病理学家(slp)是专业的语音使用者,他们可能会因为繁重的声音需求而遭受声音疲劳。本研究旨在探讨声音的倒侧和知觉维度及其与声带疲劳的相关性。26名slp和高级语言治疗学生(平均年龄= 27.11±6.8岁),其中男性(n = 5)和女性(n = 21)参与了本描述性横断面研究。根据声带疲劳指数(VFI),他们有声带疲劳。在声学评估中,使用Praat软件进行倒谱分析(CPP和CPPS)。使用波斯语版本的声音共识听觉知觉评价(CAPE-V)来评估发音障碍的总体严重程度。这两个评价之间的相关性也被调查使用IBM SPSS统计软件版本23。结果显示,平均CPPS(13.716±2.084)低于临界值。感知结果表明,平均总体严重程度(10.557±11.210)在正常语音质量变异性(NVVQ)范围内下降。此外,倒侧与知觉评价无显著相关(P > /05)。研究结果表明,听觉-知觉评价被认为是声音评价的金标准方法,不能单独识别声音疲劳。然而,倒侧测量可以帮助提供一个更客观的声带功能的slp与声带疲劳。因此,这两种评估都被推荐用于声音疲劳的声音评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Text and Performance Quarterly
Text and Performance Quarterly HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
60.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
A Performance studies scholar adapts Listen, performance: dropping a note for a future performer A performance pedagogy of the small Cracking up: Black feminist comedy in the twentieth & twenty-first century United States Windowscapes, dreamscapes and screen texts: train travel as performative practice in experimental film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1