The Role of Cognitive Control in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study Based on Performance in Go/No-go Task.

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE RUSI Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.32598/bcn.2021.923.3
Abdolvahed Narmashiri, Javad Hatami, Reza Khosrowabadi, Ahmad Sohrabi
{"title":"The Role of Cognitive Control in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study Based on Performance in Go/No-go Task.","authors":"Abdolvahed Narmashiri, Javad Hatami, Reza Khosrowabadi, Ahmad Sohrabi","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2021.923.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive control plays a role in human behavior and mental processes and affects paranormal beliefs. This study aims to investigate the role of cognitive control in paranormal beliefs using the go/no-go task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 92 people were selected based on low, middle, and high scores in the revised paranormal belief scale (R-PBS) and assigned to 3 groups. The groups included 30 severe paranormal believers (13 females with a mean age of 25.3 years), 31 mild paranormal believers (14 females with a mean age of 26.4 years), and 31 skeptics (16 females with a mean age of 25.8 years). All participants were tested on the go/no-go task. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted with the given groups (severe paranormal believers, mild paranormal believers, and skeptics) as the independent variable and the go/no-go subscales scores as dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings showed a significant difference between the mean scores in errors of go (F<sub>(2, 89)</sub>=7.20, P=0.01), errors of no-go (F<sub>(2, 89)</sub>=11.81, P=0.01), and reaction time (F<sub>(2, 89)</sub>=21.46, P=0.01) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The severe and mild paranormal believers had lower accuracy and slower reaction times than the skeptics group. Therefore, severe paranormal believers and mild paranormal believers had a weakness in all go/no-go subscale scores. This finding suggests that paranormal beliefs may be related to poor cognitive control.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Believers show weak cognitive control.Skeptics perform better in accuracy and reaction time.Paranormal beliefs linked to poor cognitive control.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study explores why some people strongly believe in paranormal phenomena while others don't. This study investigated the connection between cognitive control (our ability to manage thoughts and behavior) and paranormal beliefs. They found that individuals with stronger paranormal beliefs had poorer cognitive control, as they made more errors and had slower reaction times compared to skeptics. However, it's important to note that this study doesn't prove causation; it only highlights a potential link that needs more research. Understanding this connection is important because it helps us grasp why some people are more prone to believing in paranormal events. It also opens up avenues for studying how cognitive control affects human behavior and thinking. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between cognitive control and paranormal beliefs, contributing to our understanding of human behavior and belief systems. More research can further deepen our knowledge of why people hold different beliefs and how cognitive processes influence those beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51795,"journal":{"name":"RUSI Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"411-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10700808/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2021.923.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive control plays a role in human behavior and mental processes and affects paranormal beliefs. This study aims to investigate the role of cognitive control in paranormal beliefs using the go/no-go task.

Methods: A total of 92 people were selected based on low, middle, and high scores in the revised paranormal belief scale (R-PBS) and assigned to 3 groups. The groups included 30 severe paranormal believers (13 females with a mean age of 25.3 years), 31 mild paranormal believers (14 females with a mean age of 26.4 years), and 31 skeptics (16 females with a mean age of 25.8 years). All participants were tested on the go/no-go task. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted with the given groups (severe paranormal believers, mild paranormal believers, and skeptics) as the independent variable and the go/no-go subscales scores as dependent variables.

Results: The findings showed a significant difference between the mean scores in errors of go (F(2, 89)=7.20, P=0.01), errors of no-go (F(2, 89)=11.81, P=0.01), and reaction time (F(2, 89)=21.46, P=0.01) between the groups.

Conclusion: The severe and mild paranormal believers had lower accuracy and slower reaction times than the skeptics group. Therefore, severe paranormal believers and mild paranormal believers had a weakness in all go/no-go subscale scores. This finding suggests that paranormal beliefs may be related to poor cognitive control.

Highlights: Believers show weak cognitive control.Skeptics perform better in accuracy and reaction time.Paranormal beliefs linked to poor cognitive control.

Plain language summary: This study explores why some people strongly believe in paranormal phenomena while others don't. This study investigated the connection between cognitive control (our ability to manage thoughts and behavior) and paranormal beliefs. They found that individuals with stronger paranormal beliefs had poorer cognitive control, as they made more errors and had slower reaction times compared to skeptics. However, it's important to note that this study doesn't prove causation; it only highlights a potential link that needs more research. Understanding this connection is important because it helps us grasp why some people are more prone to believing in paranormal events. It also opens up avenues for studying how cognitive control affects human behavior and thinking. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between cognitive control and paranormal beliefs, contributing to our understanding of human behavior and belief systems. More research can further deepen our knowledge of why people hold different beliefs and how cognitive processes influence those beliefs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知控制在超自然信仰中的作用:基于 "去/不去 "任务表现的研究。
导言:认知控制在人类行为和心理过程中发挥作用,并影响超自然信仰。本研究旨在通过 "去/不去 "任务来探讨认知控制在超自然信仰中的作用:根据修订版超自然现象信念量表(R-PBS)的低分、中分和高分,共选取 92 人,将其分为 3 组。其中包括 30 名严重超自然信仰者(13 名女性,平均年龄 25.3 岁)、31 名轻度超自然信仰者(14 名女性,平均年龄 26.4 岁)和 31 名怀疑论者(16 名女性,平均年龄 25.8 岁)。所有参与者都接受了 "去/不去 "任务测试。以给定组别(严重超自然现象信奉者、轻度超自然现象信奉者和怀疑论者)为自变量,以 "去"/"不去 "分量表得分为因变量,进行了多变量方差分析:研究结果表明,各组之间在 "去 "的错误(F(2, 89)=7.20, P=0.01)、"不去 "的错误(F(2, 89)=11.81, P=0.01)和反应时间(F(2, 89)=21.46, P=0.01)的平均得分上存在显著差异:结论:与怀疑论者组相比,严重和轻度超自然现象信徒的准确率较低,反应时间较慢。因此,重度超自然信仰者和轻度超自然信仰者在所有 "去/不去 "分量表中的得分都较弱。这一发现表明,超自然信仰可能与认知控制能力差有关:超自然现象信仰与认知控制能力差有关。这项研究调查了认知控制(我们管理思想和行为的能力)与超自然信仰之间的联系。他们发现,超自然现象信仰强烈的人认知控制能力较差,因为与怀疑论者相比,他们犯的错误更多,反应时间更慢。不过,需要注意的是,这项研究并不能证明因果关系;它只是强调了一种潜在的联系,需要进行更多的研究。了解这种联系非常重要,因为它有助于我们理解为什么有些人更容易相信超自然事件。它还为研究认知控制如何影响人类行为和思维开辟了道路。总之,本研究为认知控制与超自然信仰之间的关系提供了宝贵的见解,有助于我们理解人类行为和信仰体系。更多的研究可以进一步加深我们对人们为何持有不同信仰以及认知过程如何影响这些信仰的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RUSI Journal
RUSI Journal POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks? Good Soldiers Don’t Rape: The Stories We Tell about Military Sexual Violence Reconsidering the Relationship Between War and Strategy Overestimating Soviet Airpower Moscow’s Perspective on Nuclear Deterrence and War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1