Use of Enzymatic Preparations to Improve the Productivity and Quality of Olive Oil

W. Al-Rousan, Khaled M. Al‐Marazeeq, M. Abdullah, Nazieh I Al Khalaileh, Malak Angor, R. Ajo
{"title":"Use of Enzymatic Preparations to Improve the Productivity and Quality of Olive Oil","authors":"W. Al-Rousan, Khaled M. Al‐Marazeeq, M. Abdullah, Nazieh I Al Khalaileh, Malak Angor, R. Ajo","doi":"10.35516/jjas.v17i4.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving the quantity and quality of olive oil extraction is considered crucial for producers not only in Jordan but also worldwide. The present study aimed to enhance olive oil yield from olive fruits without compromising its quality by applying an enzymatic treatment technique during the malaxation stage of the oil extraction process. \nThe enzymes that were used in this study were cellulase, pectinase, and a mixture of both enzymes at a ratio of (1:1). Each of the enzymes and there mixture was added at concentrations of 0.02 %, 0.04 % 0.06 %, 0.08 %, 0.10 %, and 0.12 % (w/w). Two Jordanian olive cultivars, Nabali Baladi (NB) and Nabali Muhassan (NM), in their immature state, were selected for the enzymatic treatment. The olive oil yield increased significantly (P < 0.05) after the enzymatic treatment. The increments in yield were 4.38 % (at an enzymatic concentration of 0.08 %), 3.29 % (at 0.1 %), and 5.25% (at 0.12 %) for NB treated with cellulase, pectinase, and 1:1 cellulase/pectinase, respectively. The increments in oil yield were 4.08 % (at 0.1%), 3.09 % (at 0.12%), and 4.5 (at 0.08%) for NM treated with cellulase, pectinase, and 1:1 cellulase/pectinase, respectively. The percent increments were significantly (P < 0.05) higher for NB than for NM. The quality parameters in terms of acidity, peroxide values, and UV-extinction coefficients at 232 and 270 nm were not significantly affected in any of the treatment groups when compared to those of control samples. The content of phenolic compounds, α-tocopherols, chlorophylls, and carotene was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in both oils in all enzymatic treatments than in the control, resulting in increased oxidative stability, as revealed by Rancimat analyses.","PeriodicalId":14707,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v17i4.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Improving the quantity and quality of olive oil extraction is considered crucial for producers not only in Jordan but also worldwide. The present study aimed to enhance olive oil yield from olive fruits without compromising its quality by applying an enzymatic treatment technique during the malaxation stage of the oil extraction process. The enzymes that were used in this study were cellulase, pectinase, and a mixture of both enzymes at a ratio of (1:1). Each of the enzymes and there mixture was added at concentrations of 0.02 %, 0.04 % 0.06 %, 0.08 %, 0.10 %, and 0.12 % (w/w). Two Jordanian olive cultivars, Nabali Baladi (NB) and Nabali Muhassan (NM), in their immature state, were selected for the enzymatic treatment. The olive oil yield increased significantly (P < 0.05) after the enzymatic treatment. The increments in yield were 4.38 % (at an enzymatic concentration of 0.08 %), 3.29 % (at 0.1 %), and 5.25% (at 0.12 %) for NB treated with cellulase, pectinase, and 1:1 cellulase/pectinase, respectively. The increments in oil yield were 4.08 % (at 0.1%), 3.09 % (at 0.12%), and 4.5 (at 0.08%) for NM treated with cellulase, pectinase, and 1:1 cellulase/pectinase, respectively. The percent increments were significantly (P < 0.05) higher for NB than for NM. The quality parameters in terms of acidity, peroxide values, and UV-extinction coefficients at 232 and 270 nm were not significantly affected in any of the treatment groups when compared to those of control samples. The content of phenolic compounds, α-tocopherols, chlorophylls, and carotene was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in both oils in all enzymatic treatments than in the control, resulting in increased oxidative stability, as revealed by Rancimat analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用酶制剂提高橄榄油的产率和质量
提高橄榄油提取的数量和质量被认为不仅对约旦而且对全世界的生产者都至关重要。本研究旨在通过在榨油过程的软化阶段应用酶处理技术,在不影响橄榄油质量的情况下提高橄榄果实的橄榄油产量。本研究中使用的酶是纤维素酶、果胶酶以及两种酶按1:1的比例混合。分别以0.02%、0.04%、0.06%、0.08%、0.10%和0.12% (w/w)的浓度添加酶及其混合物。选择两种约旦橄榄品种Nabali Baladi (NB)和Nabali Muhassan (NM)进行酶处理。经酶处理后,橄榄油产量显著提高(P < 0.05)。纤维素酶、果胶酶和纤维素酶/果胶酶1:1处理NB的产量分别增加4.38%(酶浓度为0.08%)、3.29%(酶浓度为0.1%)和5.25%(酶浓度为0.12%)。纤维素酶、果胶酶和纤维素酶/果胶酶1:1处理的油脂产量分别增加4.08%(0.1%)、3.09%(0.12%)和4.5%(0.08%)。NB的增加率显著高于NM (P < 0.05)。与对照样品相比,任何处理组的酸度、过氧化值和在232和270 nm处的紫外线消光系数等质量参数均未受到显著影响。ranimat分析显示,两种酶处理的酚类化合物、α-生育酚、叶绿素和胡萝卜素含量均显著高于对照(P < 0.05),从而提高了氧化稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Water Management in Jordan: A Fresh Tomato Water Footprint Analysis Evaluating the Performance of the AquaCrop Model to Soil Salinity in Jordan Valley Evaluating the Performance of the AquaCrop Model to Soil Salinity in Jordan Valley Chemical and Functional Properties of Mahlab Tree (Prunus mahaleb) Exudate Gum Replacement of Cheesecloth with Polyamide Plastic Micro-filters in the Manufacturing of Fresh White Boiled Cheese and Pasteurized White Brined Cheese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1