Phage therapy dosing: The problem(s) with multiplicity of infection (MOI)

S. Abedon
{"title":"Phage therapy dosing: The problem(s) with multiplicity of infection (MOI)","authors":"S. Abedon","doi":"10.1080/21597081.2016.1220348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The concept of bacteriophage multiplicity of infection (MOI) – ratios of phages to bacteria – historically has been less easily applied than many phage workers would prefer or, perhaps, may be aware. Here, toward clarification of the concept, I discuss multiplicity of infection in terms of semantics, history, mathematics, pharmacology, and actual practice. For phage therapy and other biocontrol purposes it is desirable, especially, not to solely employ MOI to describe what phage quantities have been applied during dosing. Why? Bacterial densities can change between bacterial challenge and phage application, may not be easily determined immediately prior to phage dosing, and/or target bacterial populations may not be homogeneous with regard to phage access and thereby inconsistent in terms of what MOI individual bacteria experience. Toward experiment reproducibility and as practiced generally for antibacterial application, phage dosing instead should be described in terms of concentrations of formulations (phage titers) as well as volumes applied and, in many cases, absolute numbers of phages delivered. Such an approach typically will be far more desirable from a pharmacological perspective than solely indicating ratios of agents to bacteria. This essay was adapted, with permission, from an appendix of the 2011 monograph, Bacteriophages and Biofilms, Nova Science Publishers.","PeriodicalId":8686,"journal":{"name":"Bacteriophage","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bacteriophage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21597081.2016.1220348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

ABSTRACT The concept of bacteriophage multiplicity of infection (MOI) – ratios of phages to bacteria – historically has been less easily applied than many phage workers would prefer or, perhaps, may be aware. Here, toward clarification of the concept, I discuss multiplicity of infection in terms of semantics, history, mathematics, pharmacology, and actual practice. For phage therapy and other biocontrol purposes it is desirable, especially, not to solely employ MOI to describe what phage quantities have been applied during dosing. Why? Bacterial densities can change between bacterial challenge and phage application, may not be easily determined immediately prior to phage dosing, and/or target bacterial populations may not be homogeneous with regard to phage access and thereby inconsistent in terms of what MOI individual bacteria experience. Toward experiment reproducibility and as practiced generally for antibacterial application, phage dosing instead should be described in terms of concentrations of formulations (phage titers) as well as volumes applied and, in many cases, absolute numbers of phages delivered. Such an approach typically will be far more desirable from a pharmacological perspective than solely indicating ratios of agents to bacteria. This essay was adapted, with permission, from an appendix of the 2011 monograph, Bacteriophages and Biofilms, Nova Science Publishers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
噬菌体治疗剂量:多重感染(MOI)的问题
噬菌体感染多重性(MOI)的概念——噬菌体与细菌的比率——历史上并不像许多噬菌体工作者所希望的那样容易应用,或者可能是他们可能意识到的。在这里,为了澄清这个概念,我从语义学、历史、数学、药理学和实际实践等方面讨论了感染的多样性。对于噬菌体治疗和其他生物防治目的,尤其不希望单独使用MOI来描述在给药过程中应用的噬菌体数量。为什么?细菌密度在细菌攻击和噬菌体应用之间可能会发生变化,在噬菌体剂量之前可能不容易立即确定,并且/或目标细菌群体在噬菌体获取方面可能不均匀,因此在MOI个体细菌经历方面不一致。为了实验的可重复性和抗菌应用的实践,噬菌体的剂量应该根据制剂的浓度(噬菌体滴度)以及应用的体积来描述,在许多情况下,噬菌体的绝对数量。从药理学的角度来看,这种方法通常比单独指示药剂与细菌的比例要可取得多。本文经许可改编自新星科学出版社2011年专著《噬菌体和生物膜》的附录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing a proposed paradigm shift in analysis of phage DNA packaging Fecal microbiota transplantation to fight Clostridium difficile infections and other intestinal diseases Félix Hubert d'Herelle (1873–1949): History of a scientific mind My scientific life Structural proteins of Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage ϕEf11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1