Effects of dry heat cookery method on beef strip loin steaks of two quality grades following sous vide preparation

J. Brooks, J. Legako, K. Vierck
{"title":"Effects of dry heat cookery method on beef strip loin steaks of two quality grades following sous vide preparation","authors":"J. Brooks, J. Legako, K. Vierck","doi":"10.22175/MMB.11700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to determine the influence of dry-heat cookery method on beef flavor development in strip loin steaks from 2 USDA quality grades following sous vide preparation. Beef strip loins were selected from 2 USDA quality grades: upper 2/3 Choice (Modest00–Moderate100) and Select (Slight00–Slight100 marbling, n= 20/grade). Following 21 d of wet aging, strip loins were fabricated into 2.54-cm thick-steaks and randomly assigned to one of 4 dryheat cookery methods: charbroiler grill (CHAR), clamshell grill (CLAM), convection oven (OVEN), and salamander broiler (SALA). Prior to untrained consumer panel and volatile compound analysis via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, steaks were cooked under sous vide conditions for 1.5 h, then finished on the assigned cookery method. There were no cooking method × quality grade interactions (P≥ 0.076) for all consumer traits evaluated. Overall, SALA steaks received higher (P< 0.05) ratings by consumers than CLAM steaks for all palatability traits. OVEN steaks had greater scores (P< 0.05) than CLAM steaks for juiciness, tenderness, and overall liking but were similar to CLAM steaks (P> 0.05) for flavor. CHAR steaks were similar (P> 0.05) to CLAM steaks for flavor but were rated higher (P< 0.05) for tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking. Steaks cooked using the OVEN method produced a greater concentration of lipid-derived volatiles, such as alcohols, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids. In direct contrast, CHAR steaks produced a higher concentration of pyrazines and Strecker aldehydes, which are derived from theMaillard reaction. These data indicate that cookery method, and therefore heat transfer method, has a substantially stronger influence on consumer ratings and flavor development than USDA quality grade in this study when steaks are prepared using sous vide methods.","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/MMB.11700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of dry-heat cookery method on beef flavor development in strip loin steaks from 2 USDA quality grades following sous vide preparation. Beef strip loins were selected from 2 USDA quality grades: upper 2/3 Choice (Modest00–Moderate100) and Select (Slight00–Slight100 marbling, n= 20/grade). Following 21 d of wet aging, strip loins were fabricated into 2.54-cm thick-steaks and randomly assigned to one of 4 dryheat cookery methods: charbroiler grill (CHAR), clamshell grill (CLAM), convection oven (OVEN), and salamander broiler (SALA). Prior to untrained consumer panel and volatile compound analysis via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, steaks were cooked under sous vide conditions for 1.5 h, then finished on the assigned cookery method. There were no cooking method × quality grade interactions (P≥ 0.076) for all consumer traits evaluated. Overall, SALA steaks received higher (P< 0.05) ratings by consumers than CLAM steaks for all palatability traits. OVEN steaks had greater scores (P< 0.05) than CLAM steaks for juiciness, tenderness, and overall liking but were similar to CLAM steaks (P> 0.05) for flavor. CHAR steaks were similar (P> 0.05) to CLAM steaks for flavor but were rated higher (P< 0.05) for tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking. Steaks cooked using the OVEN method produced a greater concentration of lipid-derived volatiles, such as alcohols, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids. In direct contrast, CHAR steaks produced a higher concentration of pyrazines and Strecker aldehydes, which are derived from theMaillard reaction. These data indicate that cookery method, and therefore heat transfer method, has a substantially stronger influence on consumer ratings and flavor development than USDA quality grade in this study when steaks are prepared using sous vide methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干热烹调方法对真空烹调后两种品质等级牛里脊牛排的影响
本研究的目的是确定干热烹饪方法对美国农业部2个质量等级的里脊牛排在真空烹调后的牛肉风味发展的影响。牛里脊肉从2个美国农业部质量等级中选择:上2/3 Choice (moderate - 00 - moderate100)和Select (Slight00-Slight100大理石纹,n= 20/级)。湿老化21 d后,将里脊肉加工成2.54 cm厚的牛排,随机分为4种干热烹饪方法:炭烤炉(CHAR)、蛤烤炉(CLAM)、对流烤炉(oven)和蝾螈烤炉(SALA)。在未经培训的消费者小组和通过气相色谱-质谱分析挥发性化合物之前,牛排在真空烹调条件下煮1.5小时,然后按照指定的烹饪方法完成。所有消费者性状均不存在烹饪方法与品质等级的交互作用(P≥0.076)。总体而言,消费者对SALA牛排所有适口性状的评分高于CLAM牛排(P< 0.05)。烤炉牛排的多汁性、嫩度和总体喜欢度得分高于CLAM牛排(P< 0.05),但风味得分与CLAM牛排相似(P> 0.05)。CHAR牛排在风味方面与CLAM牛排相似(P> 0.05),但在嫩度、多汁性和总体喜欢度方面得分更高(P< 0.05)。用烤箱法烹饪的牛排会产生更高浓度的脂质衍生挥发物,如醇、醛和羧酸。与之形成鲜明对比的是,CHAR牛排产生了更高浓度的吡嗪和斯特莱克醛,它们是由美拉德反应产生的。这些数据表明,烹饪方法,因此传热方法,对消费者评级和风味发展的影响比美国农业部在本研究中使用真空烹调方法制备牛排的质量等级要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 17698 Characterization of Pork Loin Chop Color Stability Using Loin Quality Traits and Instrumental Discoloration Measures Supranutritional Supplementation of Vitamin E Influences Myoglobin Post-Translational Modifications in Postmortem Beef Longissimus Lumborum Muscle Determination of the impact of labeling terms on consumer sensory evaluation Product yield and color of fresh beef transported at different refrigerated temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1