Changes to protocol in the regulation of adverse drug reactions – historical and current European view

S. Mimica Matanović
{"title":"Changes to protocol in the regulation of adverse drug reactions – historical and current European view","authors":"S. Mimica Matanović","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2016.1151610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an inevitable part of medication use. During clinical trials, limited information was gained on drug safety. After marketing authorization (MA), more safety data is available as more patients use the drug. Major changes in drug regulation came after drug disasters, like with sulphanilamide elixir or thalidomide use. In recent history, withdrawal of rofecoxib has demonstrated the importance of post-marketing safety monitoring. Subsequently, legislation on drug safety changed both in the United States (US) and in the European Union (EU), becoming simplified and more comprehensive. New EU legislation was implemented in 2012 and has broadened ADR definition to medication errors and overdoses. In the EU, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) has been formed within the European Medicines Agency (EMA), regulating all aspects of drug safety. Referral procedures enable a thorough scientific analysis on all issues of medication safety. In both the US and the EU, ADRs can be reported directly by patients. All reports of suspected ADRs are kept on electronic databases and are analyzed regularly using new technologies. New safety signals are subsequently discovered and evaluated. This author expects that the new regulations will effectively safeguard healthcare consumers from major drug risks.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":"49 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2016.1151610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an inevitable part of medication use. During clinical trials, limited information was gained on drug safety. After marketing authorization (MA), more safety data is available as more patients use the drug. Major changes in drug regulation came after drug disasters, like with sulphanilamide elixir or thalidomide use. In recent history, withdrawal of rofecoxib has demonstrated the importance of post-marketing safety monitoring. Subsequently, legislation on drug safety changed both in the United States (US) and in the European Union (EU), becoming simplified and more comprehensive. New EU legislation was implemented in 2012 and has broadened ADR definition to medication errors and overdoses. In the EU, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) has been formed within the European Medicines Agency (EMA), regulating all aspects of drug safety. Referral procedures enable a thorough scientific analysis on all issues of medication safety. In both the US and the EU, ADRs can be reported directly by patients. All reports of suspected ADRs are kept on electronic databases and are analyzed regularly using new technologies. New safety signals are subsequently discovered and evaluated. This author expects that the new regulations will effectively safeguard healthcare consumers from major drug risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物不良反应监管协议的变化-历史和当前欧洲的观点
药物不良反应(adr)是药物使用过程中不可避免的一部分。在临床试验期间,获得的关于药物安全性的信息有限。在上市许可(MA)后,随着越来越多的患者使用该药,可以获得更多的安全性数据。药物监管的重大变化发生在药物灾难之后,比如磺胺酏剂或沙利度胺的使用。在最近的历史中,罗非昔布的停药已经证明了上市后安全监测的重要性。随后,美国(US)和欧盟(EU)的药品安全立法都发生了变化,变得更加简化和全面。新的欧盟立法于2012年实施,并将药品不良反应的定义扩大到用药错误和过量用药。在欧盟,在欧洲药品管理局(EMA)内成立了药物警戒风险评估委员会(PRAC),负责监管药物安全的所有方面。转诊程序能够对所有药物安全问题进行彻底的科学分析。在美国和欧盟,不良反应可以由患者直接报告。所有可疑adr的报告都保存在电子数据库中,并定期使用新技术进行分析。随后发现并评估新的安全信号。笔者期待新法规能有效保障保健消费者免受重大药品风险的侵害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes to protocol in the regulation of adverse drug reactions – historical and current European view Policy and regulations in light of the human body as a ‘superorganism’ containing multiple, intertwined symbiotic relationships Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perceptions on risk management plans in the Southern Region of Portugal Increasing the odds of effective drug development: Elevating regulatory affairs professionals to strategic partners Current regulatory challenges and approaches in the registration of herbal drugs in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1