Does complex contrast training induce higher physical fitness improvement in stronger compared to weaker individuals?

IF 1.3 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.26773/mjssm.230306
Rohit K. Thapa, Gopal Kumar
{"title":"Does complex contrast training induce higher physical fitness improvement in stronger compared to weaker individuals?","authors":"Rohit K. Thapa, Gopal Kumar","doi":"10.26773/mjssm.230306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared the effects of complex contrast training (CCT) on measures of physical fitness in stronger compared to weaker individuals. Forty-one participants were initially recruited for relative strength assessment in the back squat. Thereafter, 26 participants were purposively assigned to either a stronger group (CCT-ST; relative strength ≥1.75; n = 12) or a weaker group (CCT-WK; relative strength <1.55; n = 14). Physical fitness tests were assessed pre- and post-six weeks of CCT training. Tests included 30-m sprint for speed, standing long jump and countermovement jump for power, and isokinetic peak torque of the knee flexors and extensors for strength. ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time for all dependent variables (all p <0.001, ɳp2 = 0.83 – 0.89 [large]). Post-hoc tests indicated significant performance improvements within-group for CCT-ST (all p <0.001, Hedge’s g = 0.27 – 0.98 [small to moderate], %Δ = 3.0 – 16.4) and CCT-WK (all p <0.001, Hedge’s g = 0.37 to 1.34 [small to large], %Δ = 3.1 – 17.4) for all dependent variables. No group-by-time interaction was found for the included variables. In conclusion, CCT intervention provided similar effects on the assessed measures of physical fitness in both stronger as well as weaker active individuals. Therefore, CCT can be an effective training strategy to improve physical fitness among active individuals irrespective of their relative strength.","PeriodicalId":18942,"journal":{"name":"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.230306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study compared the effects of complex contrast training (CCT) on measures of physical fitness in stronger compared to weaker individuals. Forty-one participants were initially recruited for relative strength assessment in the back squat. Thereafter, 26 participants were purposively assigned to either a stronger group (CCT-ST; relative strength ≥1.75; n = 12) or a weaker group (CCT-WK; relative strength <1.55; n = 14). Physical fitness tests were assessed pre- and post-six weeks of CCT training. Tests included 30-m sprint for speed, standing long jump and countermovement jump for power, and isokinetic peak torque of the knee flexors and extensors for strength. ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time for all dependent variables (all p <0.001, ɳp2 = 0.83 – 0.89 [large]). Post-hoc tests indicated significant performance improvements within-group for CCT-ST (all p <0.001, Hedge’s g = 0.27 – 0.98 [small to moderate], %Δ = 3.0 – 16.4) and CCT-WK (all p <0.001, Hedge’s g = 0.37 to 1.34 [small to large], %Δ = 3.1 – 17.4) for all dependent variables. No group-by-time interaction was found for the included variables. In conclusion, CCT intervention provided similar effects on the assessed measures of physical fitness in both stronger as well as weaker active individuals. Therefore, CCT can be an effective training strategy to improve physical fitness among active individuals irrespective of their relative strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂对比训练是否能使强壮的个体比弱小的个体获得更高的体能改善?
本研究比较了复杂对比训练(CCT)对体质较强和较弱个体的体能测量的影响。最初招募了41名参与者进行后蹲的相对力量评估。此后,26名参与者被有意分配到一个更强的组(CCT-ST;相对强度≥1.75;n = 12)或较弱组(CCT-WK;相对强度<1.55;N = 14)。在CCT训练前和训练后进行体能测试。测试包括30米短跑速度测试,立定跳远和反动作跳远力量测试,膝关节屈伸肌等动峰值扭矩强度测试。方差分析显示,时间对所有因变量都有显著影响(p均<0.001,p2 = 0.83 - 0.89[大])。事后检验表明,所有因变量的CCT-ST(均p <0.001, Hedge 's g = 0.27 - 0.98[小到中等],%Δ = 3.0 - 16.4)和CCT-WK(均p <0.001, Hedge 's g = 0.37 - 1.34[小到大],%Δ = 3.1 - 17.4)组内的表现均有显著改善。所包括的变量没有发现按时间分组的相互作用。综上所述,CCT干预对体力活动者和体力活动者的体能评估指标都有相似的影响。因此,CCT是一种有效的训练策略,可以提高运动个体的身体素质,而不管他们的相对力量如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: MJSSM covers all aspects of sports science and medicine; all clinical aspects of exercise, health, and sport; exercise physiology and biophysical investigation of sports performance; sport biomechanics; sports nutrition; rehabilitation, physiotherapy; sports psychology; sport pedagogy, sport history, sport philosophy, sport sociology, sport management; and all aspects of scientific support of the sports coaches from the natural, social and humanistic side.
期刊最新文献
Bilateral Asymmetry and the Relationship Between Unilateral Isokinetic Strength and Balance Performance in Male Adolescent Football Players Optimizing Athletic Performance and Post- Exercise Recovery: The Significance of Carbohydrates and Nutrition Assessment of Aerobic Fitness and Body Mass Index of Officers of the Nigerian Police Force in Enugu State, South East Nigeria Well-being and Life Satisfaction of Strength Athletes During War: Role of Individual and Health-Related Determinants Evaluation of Different Equations for Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction in Female Combat Sports Athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1