An insight into modeling wellbore stability using the extended Mogi-Coulomb criterion and poly-axial test data

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100082
Abbas Khaksar Manshad , Jagar Ali , Mostafa Aghayari , Mohammad Tabaeh Hayavi , Amir H Mohammadi , Stefan Iglauer , Alireza Keshavarz
{"title":"An insight into modeling wellbore stability using the extended Mogi-Coulomb criterion and poly-axial test data","authors":"Abbas Khaksar Manshad ,&nbsp;Jagar Ali ,&nbsp;Mostafa Aghayari ,&nbsp;Mohammad Tabaeh Hayavi ,&nbsp;Amir H Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Stefan Iglauer ,&nbsp;Alireza Keshavarz","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cost of drilling oil and gas wells is likely to be charged by billions of dollars each year due to wellbore<span> stability problems. In engineering practice, a linear poroelasticity stress model in combination with a rock strength criterion is commonly used to determine a minimum mud weight for stable well drilling. In this paper, new models for predicting the stability of vertical wellbores using the nonlinear form of Mogi criterion and poly-axial test results were perfumed. Afterward, by applying analytical models to the real field data, the applicability of the models has been verified. From comparing the results of this nonlinear and the liner Mogi-Coulomb criterions, the impact of the nonlinearity on the wellbore stability prediction has been identified. Thus, the results of nonlinear form of Mogi failure criterion were very close to the field mud weight used to successfully drill the borehole.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The cost of drilling oil and gas wells is likely to be charged by billions of dollars each year due to wellbore stability problems. In engineering practice, a linear poroelasticity stress model in combination with a rock strength criterion is commonly used to determine a minimum mud weight for stable well drilling. In this paper, new models for predicting the stability of vertical wellbores using the nonlinear form of Mogi criterion and poly-axial test results were perfumed. Afterward, by applying analytical models to the real field data, the applicability of the models has been verified. From comparing the results of this nonlinear and the liner Mogi-Coulomb criterions, the impact of the nonlinearity on the wellbore stability prediction has been identified. Thus, the results of nonlinear form of Mogi failure criterion were very close to the field mud weight used to successfully drill the borehole.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用扩展的Mogi-Coulomb准则和多轴测试数据对井筒稳定性进行建模
由于井筒稳定性问题,石油和天然气钻井成本每年可能高达数十亿美元。在工程实践中,通常采用线性孔隙弹性应力模型结合岩石强度准则来确定稳定钻井所需的最小泥浆比重。本文提出了利用非线性Mogi准则和多轴试验结果预测直井稳定性的新模型。然后,将分析模型应用于实际现场数据,验证了模型的适用性。通过与线性Mogi-Coulomb准则的比较,确定了非线性对井筒稳定性预测的影响。因此,Mogi破坏准则的非线性形式的计算结果与现场成功钻井所用的泥浆比重非常接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1