A vindication of transnational democratic education – replies to Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein and Michael Geiss

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2020-10-08 DOI:10.1080/16544951.2020.1821531
Julian Culp
{"title":"A vindication of transnational democratic education – replies to Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein and Michael Geiss","authors":"Julian Culp","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2020.1821531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Democratic Education in a Globalized World (Routledge, 2019) I defend a discourse theory of global justice as the appropriate normative 1 1 I would like to thank the guest editors of the book symposium, Klaus Dingwerth and Simon Pistor, as well as David Tresilian and Sharman Levinson for valuable exchanges on this article. ground for conceiving educational justice and citizenship education under conditions of economic and political globalization. In addition, I articulate democratic conceptions of global educational justice and citizenship education that recognize a moral-political right to democratically adequate education and call for the creation of transnational democratic consciousness. Based on these conceptions I spell out school practices such as historically informed, cross-cultural learning within socially diverse settings that would contribute to realizing these conceptions. In this article I reply to liberal perfectionist, communitarian-conservative and empiricist-historical critiques of Democratic Education in a Globalized World from Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein and Michael Geiss, respectively. I emphasize the feasibility of injustice-reducing educational practices, I explain how a discourse theory of justice accommodates considerations of both the good and the right, and I justify why the grim record of past educational experience does not render pointless the pursuit of progressive aims through education.","PeriodicalId":55964,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Global Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & Global Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1821531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Democratic Education in a Globalized World (Routledge, 2019) I defend a discourse theory of global justice as the appropriate normative 1 1 I would like to thank the guest editors of the book symposium, Klaus Dingwerth and Simon Pistor, as well as David Tresilian and Sharman Levinson for valuable exchanges on this article. ground for conceiving educational justice and citizenship education under conditions of economic and political globalization. In addition, I articulate democratic conceptions of global educational justice and citizenship education that recognize a moral-political right to democratically adequate education and call for the creation of transnational democratic consciousness. Based on these conceptions I spell out school practices such as historically informed, cross-cultural learning within socially diverse settings that would contribute to realizing these conceptions. In this article I reply to liberal perfectionist, communitarian-conservative and empiricist-historical critiques of Democratic Education in a Globalized World from Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein and Michael Geiss, respectively. I emphasize the feasibility of injustice-reducing educational practices, I explain how a discourse theory of justice accommodates considerations of both the good and the right, and I justify why the grim record of past educational experience does not render pointless the pursuit of progressive aims through education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国民主教育的辩护——回复Michael Festl, Martin Beckstein和Michael Geiss
在《全球化世界中的民主教育》(Routledge, 2019)一书中,我为全球正义的话语理论辩护,认为它是适当的规范。我要感谢本书研讨会的客座编辑克劳斯·丁沃斯和西蒙·皮斯托,以及大卫·特雷斯利安和沙曼·莱文森就本文进行了宝贵的交流。经济、政治全球化条件下教育正义与公民教育构想的基础。此外,我阐明了全球教育正义和公民教育的民主概念,这些概念承认民主充分教育的道德-政治权利,并呼吁创造跨国民主意识。在这些概念的基础上,我详细阐述了学校的实践,比如在不同社会背景下的历史知识和跨文化学习,这将有助于实现这些概念。在这篇文章中,我分别对Michael Festl、Martin Beckstein和Michael Geiss对全球化世界中的民主教育的自由主义完美主义者、社群主义保守主义者和经验主义历史主义者的批评进行了回应。我强调了减少不公正的教育实践的可行性,我解释了正义的话语理论如何容纳对善与对的考虑,我还证明了为什么过去教育经验的严峻记录并没有使通过教育追求进步目标变得毫无意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
What does populism mean for democracy? Populist practice, democracy and constitutionalism Effective altruism, tithing, and a principle of progressive giving The function of solidarity and its normative implications The Humanity of Universal Crime: Inclusion, Inequality, and Intervention in International Political Thought On why the poor have duties too
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1