N. Dassi, N. S. Silva, F. Silva, D. Almeida, M.R. Oliveira, S. Cavalheiro, P. Dastoli, M. D. Seixas, A. Cappellano
{"title":"Single-Agent Oral Vinorelbine in the Treatment of Pediatric Progressive Optic Pathway Glioma: A Single Institutional Experience","authors":"N. Dassi, N. S. Silva, F. Silva, D. Almeida, M.R. Oliveira, S. Cavalheiro, P. Dastoli, M. D. Seixas, A. Cappellano","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.07.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The vinca alkaloids’ activity against pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is well established. The \ngoal of the present study is to describe our experience with oral vinorelbine in patients with progressive \noptic pathway glioma (OPG), not only regarding the clinical response, but also the cost benefit using an oral \nmedication. Methods: Patients under 21 years of age with unresectable and/or progressive OPG were \neligible. Oral vinorelbine was administered at a dose of 90mg/m2 daily on days 0, 8 and 22, in a scheme of \n4 weekly cycles for a total of 18 cycles (54 doses). \nResults: From 2013 to 2018, sixteen patients were enrolled onto the study, with a median age of 9,1 years \n(range 4,6-17,8y). The most common histology was pilocytic astrocytoma (88,8%). Best response to \nchemotherapy was reviewed with a response rate (complete, partial, or minor response) of 30% for the \npatients treated exclusively with the oral drug. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 43.4%. Six \npatients had to change to intravenous vinorelbine due to gastrointestinal toxicity, vomiting grade III. None \nof the patients showed neurotoxicity. The total cost including drug acquisition, administration and toxicity \nmanagement was lower with the oral formulation comparing to IV one. \nConclusion: Single-agent oral vinorelbine seems to have some clinical activity in the management of \nrecurrent or refractory pediatric OPG, being an interesting and cost-effective option, minding that \ngastrointestinal toxicity may be limiting and a combination of antiemetics should be considered in this \ntreatment regimen.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.07.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The vinca alkaloids’ activity against pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is well established. The
goal of the present study is to describe our experience with oral vinorelbine in patients with progressive
optic pathway glioma (OPG), not only regarding the clinical response, but also the cost benefit using an oral
medication. Methods: Patients under 21 years of age with unresectable and/or progressive OPG were
eligible. Oral vinorelbine was administered at a dose of 90mg/m2 daily on days 0, 8 and 22, in a scheme of
4 weekly cycles for a total of 18 cycles (54 doses).
Results: From 2013 to 2018, sixteen patients were enrolled onto the study, with a median age of 9,1 years
(range 4,6-17,8y). The most common histology was pilocytic astrocytoma (88,8%). Best response to
chemotherapy was reviewed with a response rate (complete, partial, or minor response) of 30% for the
patients treated exclusively with the oral drug. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 43.4%. Six
patients had to change to intravenous vinorelbine due to gastrointestinal toxicity, vomiting grade III. None
of the patients showed neurotoxicity. The total cost including drug acquisition, administration and toxicity
management was lower with the oral formulation comparing to IV one.
Conclusion: Single-agent oral vinorelbine seems to have some clinical activity in the management of
recurrent or refractory pediatric OPG, being an interesting and cost-effective option, minding that
gastrointestinal toxicity may be limiting and a combination of antiemetics should be considered in this
treatment regimen.