Safety and efficacy of desvenlafaxine with escitalopram among the patients of depression associated with anxiety: A randomized, open-labeled, comparative study

Sowmya Bandaru, Anitha Alivelu, S. K., Prabhakar Yendluri
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of desvenlafaxine with escitalopram among the patients of depression associated with anxiety: A randomized, open-labeled, comparative study","authors":"Sowmya Bandaru, Anitha Alivelu, S. K., Prabhakar Yendluri","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.05277202305062023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Depression is a frequently occurring mental health problem that affects people from all walks of life. Similar emphasis is placed on physical and mental wellness. Anxiety is frequently present along with depression when it has a chronic course. In comparison to depression alone, anxiety-associated depression may be more severe, has a higher propensity for suicide, and has an inadequate treatment response. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are said to be more successful in treating anxiety-associated major depressive disorder (MDD). Aims and Objectives: MDD with anxiety is effectively treated with SSRI and SNRI. Desvenlafaxine (SNRI) and escitalopram (SSRI) were compared for safety and effectiveness in this randomized, open-label trial. Materials and Methods: With prior approval from the institutional ethical committee, 100 patients with the diagnoses of depression and anxiety were enrolled in the study. The patients were split into two groups at random at a ratio of 1:1. Desvenlafaxine was administered to the test group, whereas escitalopram was administered to the control group as the standard medication. Both medications were administered orally once each day for a total of 8 weeks. At the beginning, 4th, and 8th weeks, the patients were observed. Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D) and Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A) assessments of effectiveness were compared. During follow-up visits, patients who experienced a reduction in rating scores of at least 50% from baseline were considered treatment responders. Alterations in laboratory measurements, vitals, and reported side effects were used to evaluate safety and tolerability. Results: The HAM-D and HAM-A scores in both the desvenlafaxine and escitalopram groups significantly decreased from their respective baselines (P < 0.001). At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, however, neither group was able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. Both escitalopram and desvenlafaxine were determined to be safe, with escitalopram having superior tolerance and much fewer adverse effects recorded than desvenlafaxine. Conclusion: Escitalopram and desvenlafaxine were equally effective at reducing the symptoms of anxiety related depression. Escitalopram was found to be well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.05277202305062023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression is a frequently occurring mental health problem that affects people from all walks of life. Similar emphasis is placed on physical and mental wellness. Anxiety is frequently present along with depression when it has a chronic course. In comparison to depression alone, anxiety-associated depression may be more severe, has a higher propensity for suicide, and has an inadequate treatment response. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are said to be more successful in treating anxiety-associated major depressive disorder (MDD). Aims and Objectives: MDD with anxiety is effectively treated with SSRI and SNRI. Desvenlafaxine (SNRI) and escitalopram (SSRI) were compared for safety and effectiveness in this randomized, open-label trial. Materials and Methods: With prior approval from the institutional ethical committee, 100 patients with the diagnoses of depression and anxiety were enrolled in the study. The patients were split into two groups at random at a ratio of 1:1. Desvenlafaxine was administered to the test group, whereas escitalopram was administered to the control group as the standard medication. Both medications were administered orally once each day for a total of 8 weeks. At the beginning, 4th, and 8th weeks, the patients were observed. Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D) and Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A) assessments of effectiveness were compared. During follow-up visits, patients who experienced a reduction in rating scores of at least 50% from baseline were considered treatment responders. Alterations in laboratory measurements, vitals, and reported side effects were used to evaluate safety and tolerability. Results: The HAM-D and HAM-A scores in both the desvenlafaxine and escitalopram groups significantly decreased from their respective baselines (P < 0.001). At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, however, neither group was able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. Both escitalopram and desvenlafaxine were determined to be safe, with escitalopram having superior tolerance and much fewer adverse effects recorded than desvenlafaxine. Conclusion: Escitalopram and desvenlafaxine were equally effective at reducing the symptoms of anxiety related depression. Escitalopram was found to be well tolerated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地文拉法辛与艾司西酞普兰在抑郁伴焦虑患者中的安全性和有效性:一项随机、开放标记的比较研究
背景:抑郁症是一种常见的心理健康问题,影响着各行各业的人们。同样强调的是身体和精神健康。焦虑经常伴随着抑郁出现,当它有一个慢性过程。与单独的抑郁症相比,焦虑相关的抑郁症可能更严重,有更高的自杀倾向,并且治疗效果不充分。5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)和选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)据说在治疗焦虑相关的重度抑郁症(MDD)方面更成功。目的和目的:重度抑郁症伴焦虑可通过SSRI和SNRI有效治疗。在这项随机、开放标签的试验中,比较了地文拉法辛(SNRI)和艾司西酞普兰(SSRI)的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:经机构伦理委员会事先批准,100名诊断为抑郁和焦虑的患者入组研究。患者按1:1的比例随机分为两组。实验组给予地文拉法辛,对照组给予艾司西酞普兰作为标准药物。两种药物均口服,每天1次,共8周。分别于治疗初期、第4周、第8周对患者进行观察。比较汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)和汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)的有效性。在随访期间,评分分数较基线降低至少50%的患者被认为是治疗应答者。实验室测量、生命体征和报告的副作用的改变用于评估安全性和耐受性。结果:地文拉法辛组和艾司西酞普兰组HAM-D和HAM-A评分均较各自基线显著降低(P < 0.001)。然而,在治疗的第4周和第8周,两组都没有表现出统计学上的显著差异。艾司西酞普兰和地文拉法辛都是安全的,艾司西酞普兰具有更好的耐受性,记录的不良反应比地文拉法辛少得多。结论:艾司西酞普兰和地文拉法辛在减轻焦虑相关性抑郁症状方面同样有效。发现艾司西酞普兰耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Substance abuse: A survey among medical students of tribal area of Chhattisgarh – A cross-sectional study Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance among 2nd-year medical students: A cross-sectional study Evaluation of ethanolic extract of leaves of Abutilon indicum on carrageenan-induced rat paw edema Students’ reflection on immediate feedback during formative assessment Randomized and controlled trial to determine safety and efficacy of Foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1