Capacity allocation in a service system with preferred service completion times

Bahar Çavdar, T. Işik
{"title":"Capacity allocation in a service system with preferred service completion times","authors":"Bahar Çavdar, T. Işik","doi":"10.1002/nav.22046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retailers use different mechanisms to enable sales and delivery. A relatively new offering by companies is curbside pickup where customers purchase goods online, schedule a pickup time, and come to a pickup facility to collect their orders. To model this service structure, we consider a service system where each arriving job has a preferred service completion time. Unlike most service systems that operate on a first‐come‐first‐serve basis, the service provider makes a strategic decision for when to serve each job considering their requested times and the associated costs. For most of our results, we assume that all jobs must be served before or on their requested time period, and the jobs are handled in overtime when capacity is insufficient. Costs are incurred both for overtime and early service. We model this problem as a Markov decision process. For small systems, we show that optimal capacity allocation policies are of threshold type and provide additional structural results for special cases. Building on these results, we devise two capacity allocation heuristics that use a threshold structure for general systems. The computational results show that our heuristics find near‐optimal solutions, and dependably outperform the benchmark heuristics even in larger systems. We conclude that there is a considerable benefit in using our heuristics as opposed to a very greedy or a very prudent benchmark heuristic, especially when the early service costs are not prohibitively high and the service capacity is scarce or there are high volumes of customer arrivals. Our results also demonstrate that as the length of the customer order horizon increases, performance of all heuristics deteriorate but the benefits of using our threshold heuristic remain considerable. Finally, we provide guidelines to select an appropriate solution method considering the trade‐off between solution quality and computation time.","PeriodicalId":19120,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","volume":"56 1","pages":"746 - 765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Retailers use different mechanisms to enable sales and delivery. A relatively new offering by companies is curbside pickup where customers purchase goods online, schedule a pickup time, and come to a pickup facility to collect their orders. To model this service structure, we consider a service system where each arriving job has a preferred service completion time. Unlike most service systems that operate on a first‐come‐first‐serve basis, the service provider makes a strategic decision for when to serve each job considering their requested times and the associated costs. For most of our results, we assume that all jobs must be served before or on their requested time period, and the jobs are handled in overtime when capacity is insufficient. Costs are incurred both for overtime and early service. We model this problem as a Markov decision process. For small systems, we show that optimal capacity allocation policies are of threshold type and provide additional structural results for special cases. Building on these results, we devise two capacity allocation heuristics that use a threshold structure for general systems. The computational results show that our heuristics find near‐optimal solutions, and dependably outperform the benchmark heuristics even in larger systems. We conclude that there is a considerable benefit in using our heuristics as opposed to a very greedy or a very prudent benchmark heuristic, especially when the early service costs are not prohibitively high and the service capacity is scarce or there are high volumes of customer arrivals. Our results also demonstrate that as the length of the customer order horizon increases, performance of all heuristics deteriorate but the benefits of using our threshold heuristic remain considerable. Finally, we provide guidelines to select an appropriate solution method considering the trade‐off between solution quality and computation time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有优先服务完成时间的业务系统中的容量分配
零售商使用不同的机制来实现销售和交付。公司提供的一种相对较新的服务是路边取货,顾客在网上购买商品,安排取货时间,然后到取货设施取货。为了对这种服务结构建模,我们考虑一个服务系统,其中每个到达的作业都有一个首选的服务完成时间。与大多数采用先到先服务的服务系统不同,服务提供商会根据每个作业的请求时间和相关成本,做出战略决策,决定何时为每个作业提供服务。对于我们的大多数结果,我们假设所有作业必须在其请求时间段之前或期间提供服务,并且在容量不足时加班处理作业。加班费和早工费都有。我们将这个问题建模为马尔可夫决策过程。对于小型系统,我们证明了最优容量分配策略是阈值型的,并为特殊情况提供了额外的结构结果。在这些结果的基础上,我们设计了两种对一般系统使用阈值结构的容量分配启发式方法。计算结果表明,我们的启发式方法可以找到接近最优的解决方案,并且即使在更大的系统中也可靠地优于基准启发式方法。我们得出的结论是,与非常贪婪或非常谨慎的基准启发式方法相比,使用我们的启发式方法有相当大的好处,特别是在早期服务成本不高,服务能力稀缺或客户到达量很大的情况下。我们的结果还表明,随着客户订单范围的长度增加,所有启发式算法的性能都会恶化,但使用阈值启发式算法的好处仍然相当可观。最后,我们提供了考虑到解决方案质量和计算时间之间的权衡,选择合适的解决方案的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assigning parcel destinations to drop‐off points in a congested robotic sorting system An optimization‐based Monte Carlo method for estimating the two‐terminal survival signature of networks with two component classes A two‐stage adaptive robust model for designing a reliable blood supply chain network with disruption considerations in disaster situations Firm decisions and government subsidies in a supply chain with consumer surplus consideration Optimal emission regulation under market uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1