{"title":"Comparison of the Social Impact of Review Articles with Original Research Articles in the Field of Library and Information Science Indexed in WoS","authors":"A. Doulani, Mahnaz Behpour, Z. Abam","doi":"10.5530/jscires.11.3.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the social impact of review articles with the original research articles in the field of Library and Information Science indexed in Web of Science. This research has been done in terms of the purpose of the applied type and in terms of methodology is survey with the Altmetric analysis approach. The study population in this study consists of review and original research articles in the field of Library amd Information Science. The results of the review of research questions showed that there is a significant difference between review articles and original research articles in terms of reading in Mendeley, sharing on Twitter, receiving citations in Wikipedia, and No significant differences between the reflection of review and original research articles in News media and policy. The results showed, the social impact of review articles was more than original research articles. So the results show the importance of review articles in the body of scientific publications. Accordingly, it is necessary for writers and researchers and subsequently scientific journals, realizing the importance of these articles in the development of science interactions with society, to pay more attention to their acceptance and publication.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the social impact of review articles with the original research articles in the field of Library and Information Science indexed in Web of Science. This research has been done in terms of the purpose of the applied type and in terms of methodology is survey with the Altmetric analysis approach. The study population in this study consists of review and original research articles in the field of Library amd Information Science. The results of the review of research questions showed that there is a significant difference between review articles and original research articles in terms of reading in Mendeley, sharing on Twitter, receiving citations in Wikipedia, and No significant differences between the reflection of review and original research articles in News media and policy. The results showed, the social impact of review articles was more than original research articles. So the results show the importance of review articles in the body of scientific publications. Accordingly, it is necessary for writers and researchers and subsequently scientific journals, realizing the importance of these articles in the development of science interactions with society, to pay more attention to their acceptance and publication.
摘要本研究的目的是比较Web of Science收录的文献综述与文献文献的社会影响。本研究是在应用类型的目的和方法方面进行的,是用替代分析法进行调查。本研究的研究对象包括图书馆情报学领域的综述和原创研究论文。对研究问题的综述结果显示,综述文章与原创性研究文章在Mendeley的阅读量、Twitter的分享量、Wikipedia的引用量等方面存在显著差异,而综述文章在新闻媒体和政策方面的反映与原创性研究文章无显著差异。结果表明,综述性文章的社会影响力大于原创性研究文章。因此,这些结果显示了综述文章在科学出版物中的重要性。因此,作者和研究人员以及随后的科学期刊都有必要认识到这些文章在科学与社会互动发展中的重要性,从而更加重视它们的接受和发表。