首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Scientometric Research最新文献

英文 中文
Quality Research Follows the Power Law 质量研究遵循幂律
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.054
Hanbin Mao, Jixin Chen
Research output can be evaluated with productivity and impact, which are quantified by the numbers of publications ( N ) and citations N c , respectively. The h -index ( H ) unifies both factors. However, as an extensive variable, it grows with quantity of research output and favors senior researchers over juniors. In this report, by analyzing the data of the world top 2% scientists ( n = 179,597) from an online database, we found that h -index follows power laws and proposes a different model from what Hirsch has originally proposed. We propose intensive indices ( Q N and Q C ) to measure quality research by comparing the actual h -index of a researcher with the power-law fitted h -indices from the top 2% scientists with the same numbers of publications and citations respectively. We further calculated a dynamic research quality ( Q 1 = Q N / Q C ) and a reduced index ( Q 2 =( Q N Q C ) 0.5 ) to evaluate research quality over time. We rationalized that the power law dependency of quality research is due to its heterogeneous production pathways that require extra effort with respect to “regular” research output. We found that research quality for the top 2% scientists is maximized with ~100 citations/paper and with about ~100 publications. A major advantage of these indices is that they are relative to the academic peers with similar accomplishments in publications and citations, and therefore, are independent of career stages. Since Q indices are positively correlated with H/N ratios, the research quality can also be quickly and conveniently estimated by the readily accessible values calculated using the equation H/ (N)^(2/3) or H/(Nc)^(1/2) .
研究成果可以用生产率和影响力来评估,生产率和影响力分别用出版物数量(N)和引用次数(N c)来量化。h 指数(H)将这两个因素统一起来。然而,作为一个广泛的变量,它随着研究成果数量的增加而增长,并有利于资深研究人员而非年轻研究人员。在本报告中,通过分析在线数据库中世界排名前 2% 的科学家(n = 179 597)的数据,我们发现 h 指数遵循幂律,并提出了与赫希最初提出的不同的模型。我们提出了密集指数(Q N 和 Q C),通过比较研究人员的实际 h 指数和前 2% 科学家的幂律拟合 h 指数(发表论文数和引用次数分别相同)来衡量研究质量。我们还计算了动态研究质量(Q 1 = Q N / Q C)和缩减指数(Q 2 =( Q N Q C ) 0.5),以评估随时间变化的研究质量。我们认为,高质量研究的幂律依赖性是由于其生产途径的异质性,与 "常规 "研究成果相比,需要付出额外的努力。我们发现,排名前 2% 的科学家的研究质量在约 100 次引用/篇论文和约 100 篇论文时达到最高水平。这些指数的一个主要优点是,它们是相对于在论文和引用方面取得类似成就的学术同行而言的,因此与职业阶段无关。由于 Q 指数与 H/N 比值呈正相关,因此也可以通过使用公式 H/ (N)^(2/3) 或 H/(Nc)^(1/2) 计算出的现成值,快速方便地估算出研究质量。
{"title":"Quality Research Follows the Power Law","authors":"Hanbin Mao, Jixin Chen","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.054","url":null,"abstract":"Research output can be evaluated with productivity and impact, which are quantified by the numbers of publications ( N ) and citations N c , respectively. The h -index ( H ) unifies both factors. However, as an extensive variable, it grows with quantity of research output and favors senior researchers over juniors. In this report, by analyzing the data of the world top 2% scientists ( n = 179,597) from an online database, we found that h -index follows power laws and proposes a different model from what Hirsch has originally proposed. We propose intensive indices ( Q N and Q C ) to measure quality research by comparing the actual h -index of a researcher with the power-law fitted h -indices from the top 2% scientists with the same numbers of publications and citations respectively. We further calculated a dynamic research quality ( Q 1 = Q N / Q C ) and a reduced index ( Q 2 =( Q N Q C ) 0.5 ) to evaluate research quality over time. We rationalized that the power law dependency of quality research is due to its heterogeneous production pathways that require extra effort with respect to “regular” research output. We found that research quality for the top 2% scientists is maximized with ~100 citations/paper and with about ~100 publications. A major advantage of these indices is that they are relative to the academic peers with similar accomplishments in publications and citations, and therefore, are independent of career stages. Since Q indices are positively correlated with H/N ratios, the research quality can also be quickly and conveniently estimated by the readily accessible values calculated using the equation H/ (N)^(2/3) or H/(Nc)^(1/2) .","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139201689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Publications on Environmental Innovation 有关环境创新的出版物的综合文献计量分析和可视化
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.052
Emmanuel Baffour Gyau, Kulena Sakuwuda, Ernest Asimeng
{"title":"A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Publications on Environmental Innovation","authors":"Emmanuel Baffour Gyau, Kulena Sakuwuda, Ernest Asimeng","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139197258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors that Influence How Scientific Articles and Reviews are Mentioned on Twitter 影响科学文章和评论在 Twitter 上被提及的因素
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.055
Pablo Dorta Gonzalez
Governments are increasingly pushing researchers to engage in activities with societal impact, emphasizing the need for research dissemination and engagement with the broader public. This study addresses this imperative by investigating the multifaceted factors that influence social media attention, particularly on Twitter, for scientific research. Using Altmetric data and employing multiple linear regression analysis, this paper explores the determinants of Twitter mentions for research outputs. The study shows that certain factors have a significant impact on the level of engagement. In particular, the presence of research in mainstream news emerges as the most influential factor, highlighting the power of media coverage in increasing research visibility. In addition, research topics that align with highly topical issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, also garner significant attention on Twitter. Conversely, the influence of expert recommendations and the consolidation of knowledge in the form of review articles have a relatively weaker impact on Twitter mentions. In addition, this study underscores that public policy references in reports and citations within Wikipedia have limited influence in driving social media attention. Interestingly, mentions in patent applications do not have a significant impact in this context. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of research dissemination in the digital age and sheds light on the nuanced factors that can enhance or diminish its societal impact on Twitter.
各国政府正越来越多地推动科研人员参与具有社会影响力的活动,强调科研传播和与更广泛公众接触的必要性。本研究通过调查影响社交媒体(尤其是推特)对科学研究关注度的多方面因素,探讨了这一必要性。本文利用 Altmetric 数据并采用多元线性回归分析,探讨了 Twitter 上科研成果提及率的决定因素。研究表明,某些因素对参与度有重大影响。其中,研究成果出现在主流新闻中是最具影响力的因素,这凸显了媒体报道在提高研究知名度方面的作用。此外,与热门话题(如 COVID-19 大流行)相吻合的研究课题也会在 Twitter 上获得大量关注。相反,专家建议和综述文章形式的知识整合对 Twitter 提及率的影响相对较弱。此外,本研究还强调,报告中的公共政策引用和维基百科中的引用在推动社交媒体关注方面的影响力有限。有趣的是,专利申请中的引用在这方面的影响并不大。总之,本研究为研究在数字时代的传播动态提供了宝贵的见解,并揭示了可以增强或削弱其在 Twitter 上的社会影响的细微因素。
{"title":"Factors that Influence How Scientific Articles and Reviews are Mentioned on Twitter","authors":"Pablo Dorta Gonzalez","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.055","url":null,"abstract":"Governments are increasingly pushing researchers to engage in activities with societal impact, emphasizing the need for research dissemination and engagement with the broader public. This study addresses this imperative by investigating the multifaceted factors that influence social media attention, particularly on Twitter, for scientific research. Using Altmetric data and employing multiple linear regression analysis, this paper explores the determinants of Twitter mentions for research outputs. The study shows that certain factors have a significant impact on the level of engagement. In particular, the presence of research in mainstream news emerges as the most influential factor, highlighting the power of media coverage in increasing research visibility. In addition, research topics that align with highly topical issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, also garner significant attention on Twitter. Conversely, the influence of expert recommendations and the consolidation of knowledge in the form of review articles have a relatively weaker impact on Twitter mentions. In addition, this study underscores that public policy references in reports and citations within Wikipedia have limited influence in driving social media attention. Interestingly, mentions in patent applications do not have a significant impact in this context. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of research dissemination in the digital age and sheds light on the nuanced factors that can enhance or diminish its societal impact on Twitter.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"79 5-6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139205863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Impact of Altmetrics in Relation to Citation Count and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 探索 Altmetrics 对引用次数和 SCImago 期刊排名(SJR)的影响
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.058
Arshia Ayoub, Raashida Amin, Zahid Ashraf Wani
A tide of new research metrics of social web analysis has drawn the attention of researchers from quite some time now. This new alternative metrics – referred to as the Altmetrics, to some degree, is considered to complement the traditional metric indicators especially the citation metrics. Citations reflect the impact of the research mostly from the academic sections while Altmetrics besides academics demonstrates the consumption of research from a wider community including practitioners, instructors and general public too. Since, both i.e., Altmetrics and citation count are employed to gauge the research impact, therefore, this study attempts to correlate the two in order to determine their extent of comparability and association. The Altmetric scores were compared with the citation counts for the articles associated with the field of Biological Sciences, Earth and Environmental Science, History and Archaeology and Studies in Human Society from the list of top 100 articles, provided by the aggregator - altmetric.com for time period 2014 – 2017. Besides, the harvested articles' altmetric scores were correlated with the SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) of the journals of the respective articles in which they were published. Finally, Spearman's correlation was calculated to gauge the association between the variables. The study found that among the four categories, Earth and Environmental science shows the most significant correlation between the citation count and Altmetric score while for the Altmetrics and SJR score in the said field, no such trend is visible. History and Archaeology also shows the strong correlation between the Altmetrics and citation scores with the exception of articles for the year-2016 and somewhat similar trend was noted for the Altmetrics and SJR score of the publications. Biological sciences show a weak correlation for both the pairs of variables while those pertaining to studies in human society mostly show negative association for both sets of variables. Thus, from analysis it can be deduced that, excluding the category of human society, the other three categories (i.e., Biological Sciences, Earth and Environmental science, History and Archaeology), mostly show positive correlation between the Altmetrics and citation score of publications and also, to some extent, for the Altmetrics and SJR score of the publications. The study would provide an insight in the association and degree of relation between the two-research metrics for their better usability and applicability.
社会网络分析的新研究指标浪潮在相当长的一段时间内吸引了研究人员的注意力。这种新的替代指标--即 Altmetrics--在某种程度上被认为是对传统指标(尤其是引用指标)的补充。引用指标主要反映了研究在学术界的影响,而 Altmetrics 除了反映学术界的影响外,还反映了包括从业人员、教师和普通大众在内的更广泛群体对研究的消费。由于 Altmetrics 和引用次数都用于衡量研究影响,因此本研究试图将两者联系起来,以确定它们的可比性和关联性。本研究将 Altmetric 分数与 2014 - 2017 年期间由聚合器 altmetric.com 提供的前 100 篇文章列表中与生物科学、地球与环境科学、历史与考古学和人类社会研究领域相关的文章的引用次数进行了比较。此外,收获文章的 altmetric 分数与文章发表期刊的 SJR(SCImago 期刊排名)相关联。最后,还计算了斯皮尔曼相关性,以衡量变量之间的关联。研究发现,在四个类别中,地球与环境科学领域的引用次数与 Altmetric 分数之间的相关性最为显著,而该领域的 Altmetrics 分数与 SJR 分数之间的相关性则不明显。历史和考古学也显示出 Altmetrics 和引用次数之间的强相关性,但 2016 年的文章除外,出版物的 Altmetrics 和 SJR 分数也呈现出类似的趋势。生物科学在两对变量中的相关性较弱,而与人类社会研究相关的变量在两组变量中大多呈负相关。因此,通过分析可以推断出,除人类社会类别外,其他三个类别(即生物科学、地球与环境科学、历史与考古学)的 Altmetrics 与出版物的引文得分之间大多呈正相关,在一定程度上,Altmetrics 与出版物的 SJR 分数之间也呈正相关。这项研究将有助于深入了解这两个研究指标之间的关联和关系程度,从而更好地利用和适用这两个指标。
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Altmetrics in Relation to Citation Count and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)","authors":"Arshia Ayoub, Raashida Amin, Zahid Ashraf Wani","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.058","url":null,"abstract":"A tide of new research metrics of social web analysis has drawn the attention of researchers from quite some time now. This new alternative metrics – referred to as the Altmetrics, to some degree, is considered to complement the traditional metric indicators especially the citation metrics. Citations reflect the impact of the research mostly from the academic sections while Altmetrics besides academics demonstrates the consumption of research from a wider community including practitioners, instructors and general public too. Since, both i.e., Altmetrics and citation count are employed to gauge the research impact, therefore, this study attempts to correlate the two in order to determine their extent of comparability and association. The Altmetric scores were compared with the citation counts for the articles associated with the field of Biological Sciences, Earth and Environmental Science, History and Archaeology and Studies in Human Society from the list of top 100 articles, provided by the aggregator - altmetric.com for time period 2014 – 2017. Besides, the harvested articles' altmetric scores were correlated with the SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) of the journals of the respective articles in which they were published. Finally, Spearman's correlation was calculated to gauge the association between the variables. The study found that among the four categories, Earth and Environmental science shows the most significant correlation between the citation count and Altmetric score while for the Altmetrics and SJR score in the said field, no such trend is visible. History and Archaeology also shows the strong correlation between the Altmetrics and citation scores with the exception of articles for the year-2016 and somewhat similar trend was noted for the Altmetrics and SJR score of the publications. Biological sciences show a weak correlation for both the pairs of variables while those pertaining to studies in human society mostly show negative association for both sets of variables. Thus, from analysis it can be deduced that, excluding the category of human society, the other three categories (i.e., Biological Sciences, Earth and Environmental science, History and Archaeology), mostly show positive correlation between the Altmetrics and citation score of publications and also, to some extent, for the Altmetrics and SJR score of the publications. The study would provide an insight in the association and degree of relation between the two-research metrics for their better usability and applicability.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":" 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139197685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Networking and Gender-Homophily in Article Publications: A Tale of Two Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) 文章发表中的社交网络与性别同源性:两所印度管理学院(IIM)的故事
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.062
Ramkumar S Ramkumar
{"title":"Social Networking and Gender-Homophily in Article Publications: A Tale of Two Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs)","authors":"Ramkumar S Ramkumar","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.062","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139198297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research? 如何确定管理研究系统综述研究的内容界限?
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.059
Mehmet ali Koseoglu, H. Arici
To offer new insights into relevant concepts, approaches, and theories, a systematic literature review is considered a common phenomenon in today’s management field. But, the domain has still suffered from a lack of advice on how to design content boundaries as a methodological piece of a systematic review. Our study emphasizes this gap and examines the important piece of review studies in greater detail. Specifically, we provide a critical review of review studies published in leading three management journals (i.e., the International Journal of Management Reviews, the Academy of Management Annals, and the Journal of Management) between 2019 and 2022. Drawing on the methodological review, our research provides issues to acknowledge in the most crucial choices for the content boundary. In addition, our review clarifies three main components of the content boundary process: identification of content boundaries, searching for content boundaries, and confirmation of content boundaries. These components could be adopted as benchmark stages in future systematic review studies.
为了对相关概念、方法和理论提出新的见解,系统性文献综述被认为是当今管理领域的一种普遍现象。但是,该领域仍然缺乏关于如何设计内容界限的建议,而内容界限是系统性综述的方法之一。我们的研究强调了这一差距,并对综述研究中的这一重要部分进行了更详细的研究。具体来说,我们对 2019 年至 2022 年间发表在三大管理期刊(即《国际管理评论杂志》、《管理学院年鉴》和《管理学报》)上的综述研究进行了批判性评述。借鉴方法论评论,我们的研究提供了在内容边界的最关键选择中需要承认的问题。此外,我们的综述阐明了内容边界过程的三个主要组成部分:确定内容边界、搜索内容边界和确认内容边界。在未来的系统性综述研究中,可将这些组成部分作为基准阶段。
{"title":"How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?","authors":"Mehmet ali Koseoglu, H. Arici","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.059","url":null,"abstract":"To offer new insights into relevant concepts, approaches, and theories, a systematic literature review is considered a common phenomenon in today’s management field. But, the domain has still suffered from a lack of advice on how to design content boundaries as a methodological piece of a systematic review. Our study emphasizes this gap and examines the important piece of review studies in greater detail. Specifically, we provide a critical review of review studies published in leading three management journals (i.e., the International Journal of Management Reviews, the Academy of Management Annals, and the Journal of Management) between 2019 and 2022. Drawing on the methodological review, our research provides issues to acknowledge in the most crucial choices for the content boundary. In addition, our review clarifies three main components of the content boundary process: identification of content boundaries, searching for content boundaries, and confirmation of content boundaries. These components could be adopted as benchmark stages in future systematic review studies.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139198650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Studies on Unrestrained and Commercializable Intellectual Property in Higher Educational Institutions 关于高等院校无约束和可商业化知识产权的研究
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.065
Narahari R N Narahari, Mukunda H S Mukunda
{"title":"Studies on Unrestrained and Commercializable Intellectual Property in Higher Educational Institutions","authors":"Narahari R N Narahari, Mukunda H S Mukunda","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.065","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139198923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping the Evolution of Sustainability Transitions Research: A Bibliometric Analysis 绘制可持续性过渡研究的演变图:文献计量分析
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.050
Sunny Dhiman, Rajbeer Singh, V. Arjune, R. S. Yadav, Mritunjay Singh Yadav, Albert Bansala
The Sustainability Transitions (ST) research has emerged as a promising approach to addressing climate change-led uncertainty. The ST research primarily emerged and concentrated in global north countries, but the global south has witnessed significant development. A gap in the bibliometric analysis of evolution ST research and its geography is addressed. The questions are, how has ST research evolved over the years (1994 to 2021), and how has ST research evolution reflected the dynamics of geographies? The ST literature is examined from the Scopus citation database (from 1994 to 2021). Results suggest that the ST research evolved in the Lag phase (1994 to 2002) and growth phase (2002 to 2021) as an S curve in Science Policy studies. The western geography of Europe is the origin and significant contributor to the location of authors, collaboration, and receiving the highest citation of publications. China, Brazil, India and South Africa are major non-OECD leading countries in ST research. The Dutch ST research has witnessed the highest impact. Most of the journals on ST research are published in the UK, out top 20 journals in the world. The research support and more numbers of researchers have led to the dominance of European countries in ST research. Finally, the study suggests that global sustainability issues necessitate an inclusive and diverse approach to ST research, incorporating knowledge from the global south.
可持续性过渡(ST)研究已成为应对气候变化导致的不确定性的一种有前途的方法。可持续性过渡研究主要出现并集中在全球北方国家,但全球南方国家也取得了重大发展。本报告探讨了对转型研究的文献计量分析及其地域分布方面的空白。问题是:这些年来(1994 年至 2021 年)ST 研究是如何发展的?我们从 Scopus 引文数据库(1994 年至 2021 年)中对 ST 文献进行了研究。结果表明,ST 研究在滞后阶段(1994 年至 2002 年)和增长阶段(2002 年至 2021 年)的演变就像科学政策研究中的 S 曲线。欧洲西部地区是作者所在地、合作地和出版物引用率最高的地区,也是重要的贡献者。中国、巴西、印度和南非是非经合组织国家在科技研究方面的主要领先国家。荷兰的科技研究影响最大。大多数科技研究期刊都在英国出版,在世界排名前 20 位的期刊中位居前列。研究支持和更多的研究人员使得欧洲国家在科技研究方面占据主导地位。最后,研究表明,全球可持续发展问题要求在科技研究中采用包容和多样化的方法,纳入来自全球南部的知识。
{"title":"Mapping the Evolution of Sustainability Transitions Research: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Sunny Dhiman, Rajbeer Singh, V. Arjune, R. S. Yadav, Mritunjay Singh Yadav, Albert Bansala","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.050","url":null,"abstract":"The Sustainability Transitions (ST) research has emerged as a promising approach to addressing climate change-led uncertainty. The ST research primarily emerged and concentrated in global north countries, but the global south has witnessed significant development. A gap in the bibliometric analysis of evolution ST research and its geography is addressed. The questions are, how has ST research evolved over the years (1994 to 2021), and how has ST research evolution reflected the dynamics of geographies? The ST literature is examined from the Scopus citation database (from 1994 to 2021). Results suggest that the ST research evolved in the Lag phase (1994 to 2002) and growth phase (2002 to 2021) as an S curve in Science Policy studies. The western geography of Europe is the origin and significant contributor to the location of authors, collaboration, and receiving the highest citation of publications. China, Brazil, India and South Africa are major non-OECD leading countries in ST research. The Dutch ST research has witnessed the highest impact. Most of the journals on ST research are published in the UK, out top 20 journals in the world. The research support and more numbers of researchers have led to the dominance of European countries in ST research. Finally, the study suggests that global sustainability issues necessitate an inclusive and diverse approach to ST research, incorporating knowledge from the global south.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"434 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139204322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive Scientometric Analysis and Longitudinal SDG Mapping of Quality and Reliability Engineering International Journal 质量与可靠性工程》国际期刊的综合科学计量分析和纵向可持续发展目标绘图
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.053
Chandan Kumar, Debidutta Pattnaik, V. Balas, Raghu Raman
Quality and reliability are essential for future-proof products. Quality and Reliability Engineering International (QREI) has progressively evolved as one of the premier international outlets publishing on practical aspects of quality and reliability engineering. This is demonstrated by its publications, reaching 2978 articles (till search date) frequently cited in journals of international repute. QREI’s citations in Scopus reached 39,399 on the search date, and its h -index is 67. Our research aims to compile a bibliometric overview of QREI research articles with a focus on a novel analysis from the perspective of sustainable development. Using Excel, R, VOSviewer, and Gephi software, we analyzed the QREI’s bibliographic records in Scopus and presented an overview of its 37 years between 1985 and 2022. Among all the publications, “Multivariate statistical process control charts: An Overview” has received the highest citation (TC: 445). The United States dominates with 858 publications, while Beihang University features as its top-citing institution (TC: 370). Muhammad Riaz of “King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia” is the most prolific QREI author with 77 publications. Two hundred fifty-six articles are synchronous with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The top three SDGs are SDG9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), and SDG3 (Good Health and Well-being). Further, the worldwide collaboration patterns and most prominent and influential topics of QREI have also been analyzed to discover the scholarly base of QREI publications. As far as we know, this is the first comprehensive and objective analysis of QREI applying scientometric methods including the SDG mappings.
质量和可靠性对于面向未来的产品至关重要。国际质量与可靠性工程》(QREI)已逐步发展成为出版质量与可靠性工程实践方面文章的主要国际刊物之一。其发表的 2978 篇文章(截至搜索日期)经常被国际知名期刊引用,就证明了这一点。截至检索日,QREI 在 Scopus 的引用次数达到 39,399 次,h 指数为 67。我们的研究旨在汇编 QREI 研究文章的文献计量概览,重点是从可持续发展的角度进行新颖的分析。我们使用 Excel、R、VOSviewer 和 Gephi 软件分析了 QREI 在 Scopus 中的书目记录,并展示了其 1985 年至 2022 年 37 年间的概况。在所有出版物中,"多变量统计过程控制图:综述 "的引用率最高(TC:445)。美国以 858 篇出版物独占鳌头,而北京航空航天大学则是其最高引用机构(TC:370)。沙特阿拉伯宰赫兰法赫德国王石油和矿业大学的 Muhammad Riaz 是 QREI 发表论文最多的作者,共发表了 77 篇文章。有 256 篇文章与可持续发展目标(SDGs)同步。排名前三位的可持续发展目标是可持续发展目标 9(工业、创新和基础设施)、可持续发展目标 7(负担得起的清洁能源)和可持续发展目标 3(良好的健康和福祉)。此外,我们还分析了 QREI 的全球合作模式和最突出、最有影响力的主题,以发现 QREI 出版物的学术基础。据我们所知,这是首次应用科学计量学方法(包括可持续发展目标映射)对 QREI 进行全面客观的分析。
{"title":"Comprehensive Scientometric Analysis and Longitudinal SDG Mapping of Quality and Reliability Engineering International Journal","authors":"Chandan Kumar, Debidutta Pattnaik, V. Balas, Raghu Raman","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.053","url":null,"abstract":"Quality and reliability are essential for future-proof products. Quality and Reliability Engineering International (QREI) has progressively evolved as one of the premier international outlets publishing on practical aspects of quality and reliability engineering. This is demonstrated by its publications, reaching 2978 articles (till search date) frequently cited in journals of international repute. QREI’s citations in Scopus reached 39,399 on the search date, and its h -index is 67. Our research aims to compile a bibliometric overview of QREI research articles with a focus on a novel analysis from the perspective of sustainable development. Using Excel, R, VOSviewer, and Gephi software, we analyzed the QREI’s bibliographic records in Scopus and presented an overview of its 37 years between 1985 and 2022. Among all the publications, “Multivariate statistical process control charts: An Overview” has received the highest citation (TC: 445). The United States dominates with 858 publications, while Beihang University features as its top-citing institution (TC: 370). Muhammad Riaz of “King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia” is the most prolific QREI author with 77 publications. Two hundred fifty-six articles are synchronous with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The top three SDGs are SDG9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), and SDG3 (Good Health and Well-being). Further, the worldwide collaboration patterns and most prominent and influential topics of QREI have also been analyzed to discover the scholarly base of QREI publications. As far as we know, this is the first comprehensive and objective analysis of QREI applying scientometric methods including the SDG mappings.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"268 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139204727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement of Bias in the Contents of Web Search for Health Information Retrieval 测量健康信息检索中网络搜索内容的偏差
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.5530/jscires.12.3.060
R. Mansour, Amr H Fatouh
{"title":"Measurement of Bias in the Contents of Web Search for Health Information Retrieval","authors":"R. Mansour, Amr H Fatouh","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.060","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139205228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Scientometric Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1