Comparative study of phenolic profile, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of aqueous extract of white and green tea

Gamal A. Gabr, H. Hassan, V. Seshadri, N. Hassan
{"title":"Comparative study of phenolic profile, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of aqueous extract of white and green tea","authors":"Gamal A. Gabr, H. Hassan, V. Seshadri, N. Hassan","doi":"10.1515/znc-2021-0321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The sole difference between white tea (WT) and green tea (GT) is the former that made only from the buds and young leaves of the Camelia sinensis plant, whilst the latter is made from matured tea leaves. The phytochemical profiles, phenolic compounds, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activity of two varieties of Camellia sinensis teas, white and green, were compared in this study. Total antioxidant capacity, reducing power, DPPH radical scavenging, and Fe+2 chelating activities were used to determine antioxidant activities in water extract of GT and WT. The largest level of phenolic content was discovered in WGTE compared with the lowest amount was found in WWTE (290.67 mg/100 g tea and 185.96 mg/100 g tea, respectively). Phenoilc acids (gallic, benzoic, chlorogenic, ellagic, and ρ-coumaric acids) and flavonoids (rutin and kampherol) were found in the two extracts. The findings of DPPH radical scavenging assays were 84.06 and 82.37% inhibition. In vitro antimicrobial activity was indicated that (WWTE and WGTE) had a high level of activity against Staphylococcus aureus, and gave negative activity against Salmonella typhimurium, and Aspergillus Niger. The WT and GT extracts are a great source of natural antioxidants with biological effects on human health.","PeriodicalId":23894,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C","volume":"13 1","pages":"483 - 492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2021-0321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The sole difference between white tea (WT) and green tea (GT) is the former that made only from the buds and young leaves of the Camelia sinensis plant, whilst the latter is made from matured tea leaves. The phytochemical profiles, phenolic compounds, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activity of two varieties of Camellia sinensis teas, white and green, were compared in this study. Total antioxidant capacity, reducing power, DPPH radical scavenging, and Fe+2 chelating activities were used to determine antioxidant activities in water extract of GT and WT. The largest level of phenolic content was discovered in WGTE compared with the lowest amount was found in WWTE (290.67 mg/100 g tea and 185.96 mg/100 g tea, respectively). Phenoilc acids (gallic, benzoic, chlorogenic, ellagic, and ρ-coumaric acids) and flavonoids (rutin and kampherol) were found in the two extracts. The findings of DPPH radical scavenging assays were 84.06 and 82.37% inhibition. In vitro antimicrobial activity was indicated that (WWTE and WGTE) had a high level of activity against Staphylococcus aureus, and gave negative activity against Salmonella typhimurium, and Aspergillus Niger. The WT and GT extracts are a great source of natural antioxidants with biological effects on human health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白茶和绿茶水提物酚类成分、抗氧化和抗菌活性的比较研究
白茶(WT)和绿茶(GT)之间的唯一区别是前者仅由茶树植物的芽和幼叶制成,而后者由成熟的茶叶制成。对两种茶树品种白茶树和绿茶树的植物化学特征、酚类化合物、抗氧化和抗菌活性进行了比较。以总抗氧化能力、还原能力、DPPH自由基清除能力和Fe+2螯合活性为指标,测定了水提物和水提物的抗氧化活性。水提物中酚含量最高,水提物中酚含量最低,分别为290.67 mg/100 g茶和185.96 mg/100 g茶。两种提取物中均含有酚酸(没食子酸、苯甲酸、绿原酸、鞣花酸和ρ香豆酸)和类黄酮(芦丁和苦参酚)。DPPH自由基清除率分别为84.06和82.37%。体外抑菌活性表明,(WWTE和WGTE)对金黄色葡萄球菌具有较高的抑菌活性,对鼠伤寒沙门菌和黑曲霉的抑菌活性为阴性。WT和GT提取物是天然抗氧化剂的重要来源,对人体健康具有生物效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hepatoprotective activity of medicinal plants, their phytochemistry, and safety concerns: a systematic review Insecticidal effect of new synthesized chalcone derivatives on Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa Comparative analysis among the degradation potential of enzymes obtained from Escherichia coli against the toxicity of sulfur dyes through molecular docking Production, purification, and determination of the biochemical properties of β-glucosidase in Trichoderma koningii via solid substrate fermentation Investigating the anti-cancer compounds from Calliandra harrisii for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer via in-silico drug design and GC-MS analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1