Attitude Change and Action in a Course Aiming for the Social Justice Turn

Lauren B. Cattaneo
{"title":"Attitude Change and Action in a Course Aiming for the Social Justice Turn","authors":"Lauren B. Cattaneo","doi":"10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0027.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a longitudinal study of a social justice– oriented service- learning course at a large diverse university. The course elucidates the social causes of social problems, with poverty as a case example. Research shows that service- learning meaningfully impacts college students but that outcomes vary across courses and students, and scholars have called for greater attention to these sources of variation and mechanisms of change. Placing social justice at the center of this inquiry means focusing on a particular subset of outcomes and student characteristics. The study evaluated changes in outcomes central to social justice pedagogy, including explicit and implicit attitudes, explored whether these changes were moderated by students’ social class, and tested whether attitude changes predicted civic behavior a year later. Compared to a control group (n = 172), students who took the course (n = 113) increased systemic attributions for poverty, decreased individualistic attributions, increased their awareness of class privilege, and increased their general social justice attitudes. They increased their civic action in terms of political action and general civic engagement. Implicit attitudes did not shift. Students who experienced more financial stress changed less in terms of deficit- oriented thinking but changed more in terms of system- oriented thinking. Pedagogical implications for social justice– oriented courses are discussed, including the need to consider techniques targeting deficit-oriented thinking and system- oriented thinking separately.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0027.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article describes a longitudinal study of a social justice– oriented service- learning course at a large diverse university. The course elucidates the social causes of social problems, with poverty as a case example. Research shows that service- learning meaningfully impacts college students but that outcomes vary across courses and students, and scholars have called for greater attention to these sources of variation and mechanisms of change. Placing social justice at the center of this inquiry means focusing on a particular subset of outcomes and student characteristics. The study evaluated changes in outcomes central to social justice pedagogy, including explicit and implicit attitudes, explored whether these changes were moderated by students’ social class, and tested whether attitude changes predicted civic behavior a year later. Compared to a control group (n = 172), students who took the course (n = 113) increased systemic attributions for poverty, decreased individualistic attributions, increased their awareness of class privilege, and increased their general social justice attitudes. They increased their civic action in terms of political action and general civic engagement. Implicit attitudes did not shift. Students who experienced more financial stress changed less in terms of deficit- oriented thinking but changed more in terms of system- oriented thinking. Pedagogical implications for social justice– oriented courses are discussed, including the need to consider techniques targeting deficit-oriented thinking and system- oriented thinking separately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会公正转向课程中的态度转变与行动
本文对某大型多元化大学的社会正义导向服务学习课程进行了纵向研究。本课程以贫困为例,阐述社会问题的社会原因。研究表明,服务学习对大学生产生了有意义的影响,但结果因课程和学生而异,学者们呼吁更多地关注这些变化的来源和变化机制。将社会正义置于这种探究的中心意味着关注结果和学生特征的特定子集。该研究评估了社会公正教学法的核心结果的变化,包括显性和隐性态度,探讨了这些变化是否受到学生社会阶层的调节,并测试了态度的变化是否能预测一年后的公民行为。与对照组(n = 172)相比,参加该课程的学生(n = 113)增加了对贫困的系统性归因,减少了个人主义归因,提高了对阶级特权的认识,并提高了对社会公正的总体态度。他们在政治行动和一般公民参与方面增加了公民行动。隐性态度没有改变。经历较大经济压力的学生在赤字导向思维方面的变化较小,但在系统导向思维方面的变化较大。讨论了社会正义导向课程的教学意义,包括需要分别考虑针对赤字导向思维和系统导向思维的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1