The impact of early acute rejection on kidney graft survival after repeat kidney transplantation

A. Pinchuk, N. Shmarina, I. Dmitriev, E. Stolyarevich, N. V. Natalya V. Zagorodnikova, K. Lazareva
{"title":"The impact of early acute rejection on kidney graft survival after repeat kidney transplantation","authors":"A. Pinchuk, N. Shmarina, I. Dmitriev, E. Stolyarevich, N. V. Natalya V. Zagorodnikova, K. Lazareva","doi":"10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-3-260-271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Despite the improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, the growing number of repeat kidney transplantations and associated risks of acute rejection make it relevant to assess the impact of early acute rejection on a long-term kidney graft survival.Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate, the clinical aspects of early acute rejection after repeat kidney transplantation and the outcomes of its treatment, to perform the assessment of the impact of rejection episodes on a long-term kidney graft survival.Material and methods. We carried out the retrospective analysis of kidney graft survival after 121 repeat kidney transplantations performed in N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine in the period from 2007 to 2018. Group I included 96 recipients after kidney transplantation without acute rejection in postoperative period. Group II consisted of 25 patients with early acute rejection after kidney transplantation. We performed the assessment of the impact of early acute rejection on the kidney graft survival in comparison with recipients with uncomplicated postoperative period. Statistical processing was carried out by nonparametric methods. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier curves.Results. 1-year and 3-year kidney graft survival rates amounted to 90.3% (95%, confidence interval 85–95) and 85.4% (95%, CI 79–91), respectively, in recipients of Group I; and 72% (95%, CI 58–86) and 60% (95%, CI 46–76) in patients of Group II. Significant differences in 1-year and 3-year kidney graft survival between patients of Group I and II have been noticed (P=0.0022 and P=0.0065, respectively).Conclusions. Patients with early acute rejection after kidney transplantation had poorer kidney graft survival in comparison with patients without rejection episodes in postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":23229,"journal":{"name":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-3-260-271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, the growing number of repeat kidney transplantations and associated risks of acute rejection make it relevant to assess the impact of early acute rejection on a long-term kidney graft survival.Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate, the clinical aspects of early acute rejection after repeat kidney transplantation and the outcomes of its treatment, to perform the assessment of the impact of rejection episodes on a long-term kidney graft survival.Material and methods. We carried out the retrospective analysis of kidney graft survival after 121 repeat kidney transplantations performed in N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine in the period from 2007 to 2018. Group I included 96 recipients after kidney transplantation without acute rejection in postoperative period. Group II consisted of 25 patients with early acute rejection after kidney transplantation. We performed the assessment of the impact of early acute rejection on the kidney graft survival in comparison with recipients with uncomplicated postoperative period. Statistical processing was carried out by nonparametric methods. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier curves.Results. 1-year and 3-year kidney graft survival rates amounted to 90.3% (95%, confidence interval 85–95) and 85.4% (95%, CI 79–91), respectively, in recipients of Group I; and 72% (95%, CI 58–86) and 60% (95%, CI 46–76) in patients of Group II. Significant differences in 1-year and 3-year kidney graft survival between patients of Group I and II have been noticed (P=0.0022 and P=0.0065, respectively).Conclusions. Patients with early acute rejection after kidney transplantation had poorer kidney graft survival in comparison with patients without rejection episodes in postoperative period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应对移植肾存活的影响
介绍。尽管免疫抑制疗法有所改进,但重复肾移植数量的增加及其相关的急性排斥反应风险使得评估早期急性排斥反应对移植肾长期存活的影响变得有意义。该研究的目的是评估重复肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应的发生率、临床方面及其治疗结果,以评估排斥反应发作对移植肾长期生存的影响。材料和方法。回顾性分析N.V. Sklifosovsky急诊医学研究所2007年至2018年进行的121例重复肾移植术后移植肾存活情况。第一组96例肾移植术后无急性排斥反应。第二组为肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应患者25例。我们评估了早期急性排斥反应对移植肾存活的影响,并与术后无并发症的受者进行了比较。采用非参数方法进行统计处理。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估生存率。组1年和3年肾移植存活率分别为90.3%(95%,可信区间85-95)和85.4% (95%,CI 79-91);II组分别为72% (95%,CI 58-86)和60% (95%,CI 46-76)。I组和II组患者移植肾1年和3年生存率差异有统计学意义(P=0.0022和P=0.0065)。肾移植术后早期出现急性排斥反应的患者与术后无排斥反应的患者相比,移植肾存活时间较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern view on calcification of xenogenic bioprosthetic heart valves and their anti-calcification treatment strategies Effect of tocilizumab on pulmonary gas exchange function in patients with severe COVID-19 Cerebral dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction The role of oxygenation in kidney and liver machine perfusion Dynamics of cognitive functions in patients with hemoblastosis treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1