Using Think-Alouds to Uncover Expert-Novice Gaps in AAC Intervention Planning Skills

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.30707/TLCSD4.2/CQJO9452
Allison M. Sauerwein, Jane R. Wegner
{"title":"Using Think-Alouds to Uncover Expert-Novice Gaps in AAC Intervention Planning Skills","authors":"Allison M. Sauerwein, Jane R. Wegner","doi":"10.30707/TLCSD4.2/CQJO9452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because few studies have explored preservice speech-language pathologists’ (SLP’s) learning outcomes in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) coursework and clinical practica, there is a need to investigate student learning in this area. This article represents a portion of a larger study that explored the expert-novice gap in planning for intervention with children who use AAC. The companion article reports clinical reasoning skills, whereas the present study revealed intervention planning skills. The methods are the consistent with those reported in the companion article. In summary, eight novice (i.e. preservice) SLPs and eight expert SLPs completed think-aloud tasks while they developed intervention plans. Verbal data were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. Eight intervention planning skills emerged from the data: selecting treatment style, planning activities, selecting or developing materials, planning teaching strategies, selecting targets, goal setting, collecting data, and feature matching. Considerable overlap across expert and novice performance was observed in some areas, while minor differences were noted in other skills. Expert-novice gaps were identified in two areas, developing a treatment style and feature matching. Familiarity with expert-novice gaps in intervention planning has implications for preservice instruction in AAC.","PeriodicalId":45124,"journal":{"name":"Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD","volume":"21 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD4.2/CQJO9452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Because few studies have explored preservice speech-language pathologists’ (SLP’s) learning outcomes in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) coursework and clinical practica, there is a need to investigate student learning in this area. This article represents a portion of a larger study that explored the expert-novice gap in planning for intervention with children who use AAC. The companion article reports clinical reasoning skills, whereas the present study revealed intervention planning skills. The methods are the consistent with those reported in the companion article. In summary, eight novice (i.e. preservice) SLPs and eight expert SLPs completed think-aloud tasks while they developed intervention plans. Verbal data were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. Eight intervention planning skills emerged from the data: selecting treatment style, planning activities, selecting or developing materials, planning teaching strategies, selecting targets, goal setting, collecting data, and feature matching. Considerable overlap across expert and novice performance was observed in some areas, while minor differences were noted in other skills. Expert-novice gaps were identified in two areas, developing a treatment style and feature matching. Familiarity with expert-novice gaps in intervention planning has implications for preservice instruction in AAC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用大声思考来发现专家和新手在AAC干预计划技能上的差距
由于很少有研究探讨了职前语言病理学家(SLP)在增强和替代交流(AAC)课程和临床实践中的学习成果,因此有必要调查学生在这一领域的学习情况。本文是一项大型研究的一部分,该研究探讨了使用AAC的儿童在计划干预方面的专家-新手差距。配套文章报道了临床推理技能,而本研究揭示了干预计划技能。方法与配套文章中报道的方法一致。综上所述,8名新手(即职前)和8名专家在制定干预计划的同时完成了有声思维任务。口头资料进行转录和定性分析。从数据中产生了八项干预计划技能:选择治疗方式、计划活动、选择或开发材料、计划教学策略、选择目标、设定目标、收集数据、特征匹配。专家和新手在某些领域的表现有相当大的重叠,而在其他技能方面则有细微的差异。专家与新手之间的差距在两个方面得到了识别,即开发治疗方式和特征匹配。熟悉干预计划的专家-新手差距对AAC的职前指导有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD
Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
80.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship among Cognition, Receptive Vocabulary and Speech Production Skills in Children with Cerebral Palsy A Meta-analysis Study on the Communication Attitudes of People Who Do and Do Not Stutter by Age Speech Intelligibility Improvement with Concrete and Abstract Auditory Cues Verbal Imitation in 1 to 2-Year-Old Children Survey on Communication Needs and Functions of Adults Using Personal Assistance Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1