The socialisation of educational problems and the rise of illiteracy in Mexico at the turn of the twentieth century

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00309230.2022.2155976
Marino Miranda Noriega
{"title":"The socialisation of educational problems and the rise of illiteracy in Mexico at the turn of the twentieth century","authors":"Marino Miranda Noriega","doi":"10.1080/00309230.2022.2155976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the past two decades, the interdisciplinary push to denaturalise the concept of society has historicised the very object of social history. In this paper, I propose a way of studying the social history of education that eludes the presupposition of the social as a transcendental or pre-discursive object. My central claim is that it is possible to observe a process of socialisation regarding educational problems. This means that the social and society were not simply concepts that created a new object of knowledge, but rather that they became a visualisation principle that allowed for the abstraction of categories and made observable a set of relationships. These notions are contained and articulated in how social problems were produced, observed, performed, and acted upon by educational and political actors. I will do this by examining the production of illiteracy (analfabetismo in Spanish) as a social problem in Mexico in the first decades of the twentieth century. I argue that two fundamental processes rendered illiteracy a social problem. First, the development of statistical knowledge and methods made it possible to know the number of people who did not read and write, creating the illiterate as a statistical category. The second is the articulation of this statistical reality as a generalised problem by education experts and authorities. In this sense, literacy was abstracted and framed as an essential feature for the proper functioning of a modern society.","PeriodicalId":46283,"journal":{"name":"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA","volume":"36 1","pages":"55 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2022.2155976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the past two decades, the interdisciplinary push to denaturalise the concept of society has historicised the very object of social history. In this paper, I propose a way of studying the social history of education that eludes the presupposition of the social as a transcendental or pre-discursive object. My central claim is that it is possible to observe a process of socialisation regarding educational problems. This means that the social and society were not simply concepts that created a new object of knowledge, but rather that they became a visualisation principle that allowed for the abstraction of categories and made observable a set of relationships. These notions are contained and articulated in how social problems were produced, observed, performed, and acted upon by educational and political actors. I will do this by examining the production of illiteracy (analfabetismo in Spanish) as a social problem in Mexico in the first decades of the twentieth century. I argue that two fundamental processes rendered illiteracy a social problem. First, the development of statistical knowledge and methods made it possible to know the number of people who did not read and write, creating the illiterate as a statistical category. The second is the articulation of this statistical reality as a generalised problem by education experts and authorities. In this sense, literacy was abstracted and framed as an essential feature for the proper functioning of a modern society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育问题的社会化和二十世纪之交墨西哥文盲率的上升
在过去的二十年里,跨学科对社会概念变性的推动已经将社会历史的对象历史化了。在本文中,我提出了一种研究教育社会史的方法,它避开了将社会作为先验或前话语对象的前提。我的中心观点是,观察教育问题的社会化过程是可能的。这意味着社会和社会不仅仅是创造新的知识对象的概念,而是成为一种可视化原则,允许对类别进行抽象,并使一系列关系可以观察到。这些概念包含在社会问题是如何产生、观察、执行和由教育和政治行动者采取行动的过程中。我将通过检查文盲(西班牙语为analfabetismo)作为20世纪头几十年墨西哥的一个社会问题的产生来做到这一点。我认为有两个基本过程使文盲成为一个社会问题。首先,统计知识和方法的发展使人们有可能知道不识字的人数,从而将文盲作为一个统计类别。第二点是教育专家和权威将这一统计现实作为一个普遍问题加以阐述。从这个意义上说,识字被抽象和框定为现代社会正常运转的基本特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: "Paedagogica Historica is undoubtedly the leading journal in the field. In contrast to a series of national journals for the history of education, Paedagogica Historica is the most international one." A trilingual journal with European roots, Paedagogica Historica discusses global education issues from an historical perspective. Topics include: •Childhood and Youth •Comparative and International Education •Cultural and social policy •Curriculum •Education reform •Historiography •Schooling •Teachers •Textbooks •Theory and Methodology •The urban and rural school environment •Women and gender issues in Education
期刊最新文献
Big administration reforms against Catholic reformist traditions: fusion of state and church mid-level school administrations in early nineteenth-century Prussian Silesia The transnational entanglements of James Liberty Tadd’s drawing curriculum: a curious chapter in the history of human potential Practices of reading and writing. Jean Daniel Revel and 19th-century Waldensian immigration in Uruguay Transnational knowledge circulation and the Commission on Manual and Practical Instruction in Ireland, 1896–98 Examens, grades et diplômes. La validation des compétences par les universités du XIIe siècle à nos jours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1