Individual Dose Response and Radiation Origin of Childhood and Adolescent Thyroid Cancer in Fukushima II: Possibility of High I-131 Exposure as in Chernobyl

T. Katō, Kosaku Yamada
{"title":"Individual Dose Response and Radiation Origin of Childhood and Adolescent Thyroid Cancer in Fukushima II: Possibility of High I-131 Exposure as in Chernobyl","authors":"T. Katō, Kosaku Yamada","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2022.04.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Thyroid cancer incidence of individual dose groups in Fukushima residents exposed at ≤18 years of age demonstrated a linear response to thyroid dose estimated in the United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2020/2021. Increased childhood thyroid cancer in Fukushima was found to come dominantly from radiation exposure from the nuclear accident. The UNSCEAR 2020/2021 concluded that the apparent excess of thyroid cancers would not be expected at thyroid doses estimated by the UNSCEAR. The purpose of this paper is to solve the puzzle of the high childhood thyroid cancer incidence in Fukushima despite the estimated low thyroid dose.\nMethods: The conversion coefficient k connecting thyroid doses estimated in UNSCEAR 2020/2021 and doses based on direct thyroid dose measurements in Chernobyl: 1 GyUN2021 = k × 1 Gy (gray), was estimated by comparing incidences and dose dependences of thyroid cancers in Fukushima and Chernobyl after nuclear disasters. \nResults: The ratio of the observed cases /expected cases from cancer registry: of about 60 in Fukushima prefecture, was higher than the ratios observed after the Chernobyl accident. The thyroid doses estimated by UNSCEAR were corrected by adding a baseline dose to recover the severely underestimated ingestion dose. The conversion coefficients were: k =60~70 from the comparison of the excess absolute risks (EAR) and their dose dependences in Fukushima and in Chernobyl, and k =10~180 from the comparison of excess relative risk per gray (ERR/Gy) in Fukushima with those in Chernobyl. The thyroid doses might have been underestimated by about 1/50~1/100 in UNSCEAR 2020/2021.\nConclusion: The dozens-fold increase of childhood thyroid cancer cases after the Fukushima nuclear accident was found to arise from radioactive iodine exposure comparable to that in Chernobyl.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2022.04.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Thyroid cancer incidence of individual dose groups in Fukushima residents exposed at ≤18 years of age demonstrated a linear response to thyroid dose estimated in the United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2020/2021. Increased childhood thyroid cancer in Fukushima was found to come dominantly from radiation exposure from the nuclear accident. The UNSCEAR 2020/2021 concluded that the apparent excess of thyroid cancers would not be expected at thyroid doses estimated by the UNSCEAR. The purpose of this paper is to solve the puzzle of the high childhood thyroid cancer incidence in Fukushima despite the estimated low thyroid dose. Methods: The conversion coefficient k connecting thyroid doses estimated in UNSCEAR 2020/2021 and doses based on direct thyroid dose measurements in Chernobyl: 1 GyUN2021 = k × 1 Gy (gray), was estimated by comparing incidences and dose dependences of thyroid cancers in Fukushima and Chernobyl after nuclear disasters. Results: The ratio of the observed cases /expected cases from cancer registry: of about 60 in Fukushima prefecture, was higher than the ratios observed after the Chernobyl accident. The thyroid doses estimated by UNSCEAR were corrected by adding a baseline dose to recover the severely underestimated ingestion dose. The conversion coefficients were: k =60~70 from the comparison of the excess absolute risks (EAR) and their dose dependences in Fukushima and in Chernobyl, and k =10~180 from the comparison of excess relative risk per gray (ERR/Gy) in Fukushima with those in Chernobyl. The thyroid doses might have been underestimated by about 1/50~1/100 in UNSCEAR 2020/2021. Conclusion: The dozens-fold increase of childhood thyroid cancer cases after the Fukushima nuclear accident was found to arise from radioactive iodine exposure comparable to that in Chernobyl.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福岛儿童和青少年甲状腺癌的个体剂量反应和辐射来源:与切尔诺贝利一样高剂量暴露的可能性
背景:≤18岁的福岛居民个体剂量组的甲状腺癌发病率与联合国原子辐射影响科学委员会(UNSCEAR) 2020/2021年估计的甲状腺剂量呈线性反应。福岛儿童甲状腺癌的增加主要来自核事故的辐射暴露。2020/2021年科委会的结论是,按照科委会估计的甲状腺剂量,预计不会出现明显的甲状腺癌过量。本文的目的是解决福岛儿童甲状腺癌发病率高的难题,尽管估计甲状腺剂量低。方法:通过比较福岛和切尔诺贝利核灾后甲状腺癌发病率和剂量依赖性,估算UNSCEAR 2020/2021估算的甲状腺剂量与基于切尔诺贝利直接甲状腺剂量测量的剂量之间的换算系数k: 1 GyUN2021 = k × 1 Gy(灰色)。结果:福岛县约60例癌症登记中观察病例/预期病例的比率高于切尔诺贝利事故后观察到的比率。通过增加基线剂量以恢复严重低估的摄入剂量,纠正了科委会估计的甲状腺剂量。换算系数为:福岛和切尔诺贝利的超绝对危险度(EAR)及其剂量依赖性比较k =60~70,福岛和切尔诺贝利的超每灰色相对危险度(ERR/Gy)比较k =10~180。在联合国科委2020/2021年期间,甲状腺剂量可能被低估了约1/50~1/100。结论:福岛核事故发生后,儿童甲状腺癌病例数增加了数十倍,与切尔诺贝利的放射性碘暴露相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Thymic Carcinoma: Case Report and Discussion on Problems of Treatment What is the Obstetric Outcome with a Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia? Effects of DSPP and MMP20 Silencing on Key Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Multifaceted Networking of The Orphan Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor Β in Breast Cancer Progression Current CT and MRI Applications in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1