B. Caldwell, S. Aldington, M. Weatherall, P. Shirtcliffe, R. Beasley
{"title":"Risk of cardiovascular events and celecoxib: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"B. Caldwell, S. Aldington, M. Weatherall, P. Shirtcliffe, R. Beasley","doi":"10.1258/JRSM.99.3.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo examine whether the increased risk of cardiovascular events with rofecoxib represents a class effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) specific inhibitors.\n\n\nDESIGN\nSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind clinical trials of celecoxib of at least 6 weeks' duration and presented data on serious cardiovascular thromboembolic events. Data sources included six bibliographic databases, the relevant files of the United States Food and Drug Administration, and pharmaceutical company websites.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\nPooled fixed effects estimates of the odds ratios for risk of cardiovascular events with celecoxib compared with comparator treatment were calculated using the inverse variance weight method. The main outcome measure was myocardial infarction.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFour placebo-controlled trials with 4422 patients were included in the primary meta-analysis comparing celecoxib with placebo. The odds ratio of myocardial infarction with celecoxib compared to placebo was 2.26 (95%confidence interval 1.0 to 5.1). For composite cardiovascular events [odd ratio 1.38 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.10)], cardiovascular deaths [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.38 to 2.95)] and stroke [OR 1.0(95% CI 0.51 to 1.84)] there was no significant increase in risk with celecoxib. The secondary meta-analysis which included a total of six studies (with placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and paracetamol as comparators) of 12 780 patients, showed similar findings with a significant increased risk with celecoxib for myocardial infarction [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.15 to 3.08)] but not other outcome measures.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe available data indicate an increased risk of myocardial infarction with celecoxib therapy, consistent with a class effect for COX-2 specific inhibitors.","PeriodicalId":17271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"132-40"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"187","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/JRSM.99.3.132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 187
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To examine whether the increased risk of cardiovascular events with rofecoxib represents a class effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) specific inhibitors.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind clinical trials of celecoxib of at least 6 weeks' duration and presented data on serious cardiovascular thromboembolic events. Data sources included six bibliographic databases, the relevant files of the United States Food and Drug Administration, and pharmaceutical company websites.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Pooled fixed effects estimates of the odds ratios for risk of cardiovascular events with celecoxib compared with comparator treatment were calculated using the inverse variance weight method. The main outcome measure was myocardial infarction.
RESULTS
Four placebo-controlled trials with 4422 patients were included in the primary meta-analysis comparing celecoxib with placebo. The odds ratio of myocardial infarction with celecoxib compared to placebo was 2.26 (95%confidence interval 1.0 to 5.1). For composite cardiovascular events [odd ratio 1.38 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.10)], cardiovascular deaths [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.38 to 2.95)] and stroke [OR 1.0(95% CI 0.51 to 1.84)] there was no significant increase in risk with celecoxib. The secondary meta-analysis which included a total of six studies (with placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and paracetamol as comparators) of 12 780 patients, showed similar findings with a significant increased risk with celecoxib for myocardial infarction [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.15 to 3.08)] but not other outcome measures.
CONCLUSION
The available data indicate an increased risk of myocardial infarction with celecoxib therapy, consistent with a class effect for COX-2 specific inhibitors.
目的研究罗非昔布增加心血管事件风险是否代表环氧化酶-2 (COX-2)特异性抑制剂的一类效应。设计对塞来昔布持续至少6周的随机双盲临床试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,并提供严重心血管血栓栓塞事件的数据。数据来源包括6个书目数据库、美国食品和药物管理局的相关文件和制药公司网站。主要结局测量:使用反方差加权法计算塞来昔布与对照治疗相比心血管事件风险的固定效应估计值。主要结局指标为心肌梗死。结果4个安慰剂对照试验4422例患者被纳入了比较塞来昔布和安慰剂的主要荟萃分析。与安慰剂相比,塞来昔布心肌梗死的优势比为2.26(95%可信区间为1.0 - 5.1)。对于复合心血管事件[奇比1.38 (95% CI 0.91至2.10)]、心血管死亡[OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.38至2.95)]和卒中[OR 1.0(95% CI 0.51至1.84)],塞来昔布的风险没有显著增加。次要荟萃分析共包括6项研究(以安慰剂、双氯芬酸、布洛芬和扑热息痛作为比较),共纳入12780例患者,结果显示塞来昔布显著增加心肌梗死风险[OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.15至3.08)],但没有其他结局指标。结论:现有数据表明,塞来昔布治疗心肌梗死的风险增加,与COX-2特异性抑制剂的一类效应一致。
期刊介绍:
Since 1809, the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM) has been a trusted source of information in the medical field. Our publication covers a wide range of topics, including evidence-based reviews, original research papers, commentaries, and personal perspectives. As an independent scientific and educational journal, we strive to foster constructive discussions on vital clinical matters. While we are based in the UK, our articles address issues that are globally relevant and of interest to healthcare professionals worldwide.