The three-mother problem

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Psychosocial Studies Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1332/204378919x15674406635271
Bülent Somay
{"title":"The three-mother problem","authors":"Bülent Somay","doi":"10.1332/204378919x15674406635271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Motherhood’, as opposed to ‘fatherhood’, has always been deemed to be something undisputable and certain, and as such, it is considered the main pillar of the institution of the family. There are texts throughout history, however, from the most ‘sacred’\n (The Old Testament) to the most profane (contemporary television dramas), that dispute this certainty, thereby opening up the ‘self-evidentary’ nature of the family to critical scrutiny. ‘Motherhood’ is three different things at the same time (genetic, birth\n and nurturing), and as social and cultural structures get more and more complex, and new biotechnologies develop, these three will grow apart from each other. As things stand, the biological/genetic roots of motherhood (and hence the family) are becoming more and more questionable and insignificant.\n Furthermore, the cultural/nurturing function of the family is almost ripe to be assumed by networks of chosen human relationships in the near future, in which motherhood becomes a function to be fulfilled by any human being willing to do it, regardless of genetics and gender.","PeriodicalId":29710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378919x15674406635271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Motherhood’, as opposed to ‘fatherhood’, has always been deemed to be something undisputable and certain, and as such, it is considered the main pillar of the institution of the family. There are texts throughout history, however, from the most ‘sacred’ (The Old Testament) to the most profane (contemporary television dramas), that dispute this certainty, thereby opening up the ‘self-evidentary’ nature of the family to critical scrutiny. ‘Motherhood’ is three different things at the same time (genetic, birth and nurturing), and as social and cultural structures get more and more complex, and new biotechnologies develop, these three will grow apart from each other. As things stand, the biological/genetic roots of motherhood (and hence the family) are becoming more and more questionable and insignificant. Furthermore, the cultural/nurturing function of the family is almost ripe to be assumed by networks of chosen human relationships in the near future, in which motherhood becomes a function to be fulfilled by any human being willing to do it, regardless of genetics and gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三个母亲的问题
“母亲”,相对于“父亲”,一直被认为是无可争议和确定的,因此,它被认为是家庭制度的主要支柱。然而,纵观历史,从最“神圣”的(《旧约》)到最世俗的(当代电视剧),都有一些文本对这种确定性提出质疑,从而将家庭的“自明”性质开放给批判性审查。“母性”同时是三种不同的东西(遗传、生育和养育),随着社会和文化结构变得越来越复杂,以及新的生物技术的发展,这三者将彼此分离。就目前的情况来看,母性(以及家庭)的生物学/遗传根源正变得越来越可疑和无足轻重。此外,在不久的将来,家庭的文化/养育功能几乎已经成熟,可以由选定的人际关系网络承担,在这种网络中,母性成为任何愿意这样做的人都可以履行的功能,而不论遗传和性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can religion be rescued in the 21st century? On Erich Fromm’s religious humanism in an age of authoritarian populism Racial trauma as an unlaid ghost of empire The haunting melody of loss in the racist imagination Racism, hatred and melancholic curiosity Stoking hate: configuring loss in explanations of racially aggravated crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1