Sociodemographic Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Prevalence of Comorbidity among Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disability: A Cross-sectional Study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2020-02-21 DOI:10.1080/19315864.2020.1727590
Ayla Uzun Çiçek, Seda Aybuke Sari, Cansu Mercan Isik
{"title":"Sociodemographic Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Prevalence of Comorbidity among Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disability: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Ayla Uzun Çiçek, Seda Aybuke Sari, Cansu Mercan Isik","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2020.1727590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Intellectual disability (ID) is characterized by limitations in cognitive and adaptive functioning. The aim of this study is to examine sociodemographic characteristics, perinatal and childhood risk factors, and prevalence of psychiatric and biomedical comorbidities in children with ID. Methods: 260 patients with ID were included in the study (mean age: 8.42 ± 3.59, 61% male, 75% mild ID). The Ankara Developmental Screening Inventory, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised, and the Porteus Maze Test were used to assess the intelligence of the participants. An additional questionnaire was used to investigate their sociodemographic characteristics and birth, developmental, and medical histories. Results: Adverse perinatal/neonatal events (p < .001), biomedical comorbidities (p < .001) and seizure/convulsion history (p < .001) were strongly associated with the moderate-severe ID. The children with mild ID had more emotional-social deprivation (p = .022). Low socioeconomic situation, parental education, and teenage parenthood were risk factors for stimulus deficiency. While internalizing disorders were more common in those with mild ID and among girls, externalizing disorders were more common in those with moderate-severe ID and among boys. Conclusion: Interventions to perinatal/neonatal events may reduce the rate of moderate-severe ID. Evaluation of psychiatric and medical comorbidities and elimination of emotional-social deprivation should be fundamental components of the services offered to children with ID.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"33 1","pages":"66 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2020.1727590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Intellectual disability (ID) is characterized by limitations in cognitive and adaptive functioning. The aim of this study is to examine sociodemographic characteristics, perinatal and childhood risk factors, and prevalence of psychiatric and biomedical comorbidities in children with ID. Methods: 260 patients with ID were included in the study (mean age: 8.42 ± 3.59, 61% male, 75% mild ID). The Ankara Developmental Screening Inventory, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised, and the Porteus Maze Test were used to assess the intelligence of the participants. An additional questionnaire was used to investigate their sociodemographic characteristics and birth, developmental, and medical histories. Results: Adverse perinatal/neonatal events (p < .001), biomedical comorbidities (p < .001) and seizure/convulsion history (p < .001) were strongly associated with the moderate-severe ID. The children with mild ID had more emotional-social deprivation (p = .022). Low socioeconomic situation, parental education, and teenage parenthood were risk factors for stimulus deficiency. While internalizing disorders were more common in those with mild ID and among girls, externalizing disorders were more common in those with moderate-severe ID and among boys. Conclusion: Interventions to perinatal/neonatal events may reduce the rate of moderate-severe ID. Evaluation of psychiatric and medical comorbidities and elimination of emotional-social deprivation should be fundamental components of the services offered to children with ID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年智力残疾的社会人口学特征、危险因素和共病患病率:一项横断面研究
摘要简介:智力残疾(intelligent disability, ID)以认知和适应功能受限为特征。本研究的目的是研究ID儿童的社会人口学特征、围产期和儿童期风险因素以及精神和生物医学合并症的患病率。方法:260例ID患者纳入研究,平均年龄8.42±3.59岁,男性61%,轻度ID 75%。采用安卡拉发育筛选量表、韦氏儿童智力量表(修订版)和波特斯迷宫测验对被试进行智力评估。另一份问卷用于调查他们的社会人口特征和出生、发育和病史。结果:不良围产期/新生儿事件(p < .001)、生物医学合并症(p < .001)和癫痫/惊厥史(p < .001)与中重度ID密切相关。轻度本我儿童有更多的情绪-社会剥夺(p = 0.022)。低社会经济状况、父母受教育程度和未成年父母是刺激缺乏的危险因素。内化障碍在轻度ID患者和女孩中更为常见,而外化障碍在中重度ID患者和男孩中更为常见。结论:围产期/新生儿事件干预可降低中重度ID发生率。对精神和医疗合并症的评估以及消除情感-社会剥夺应成为向患有身份证的儿童提供服务的基本组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Mental Functions in People with Mild Intellectual Disability to Borderline Intellectual Functioning Personal Growth Among Parents of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychopathology: The Role of Social Support and Attitudes Toward Service Use Clinical Opinion: Differences in Addressing Needs of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities for In-Person and Digital Psychotherapy Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1