Will Marriage Rights Bring Family Equality? Law, Lesbian Co-Mothers, and Strategies of Recognition in Taiwan

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Positions-Asia Critique Pub Date : 2021-07-19 DOI:10.1215/10679847-8978347
S. Friedman, Yi-Chien Chen
{"title":"Will Marriage Rights Bring Family Equality? Law, Lesbian Co-Mothers, and Strategies of Recognition in Taiwan","authors":"S. Friedman, Yi-Chien Chen","doi":"10.1215/10679847-8978347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article analyzes the tension between marriage and family rights in the context of Taiwan’s marriage equality movement and the then-pending legalization of same-sex marriage following a 2017 Constitutional Court ruling. It focuses on the efforts of lesbian co-mothers to secure vital legal guarantees for the families they create through intentional childbearing. As pioneers who have formed families in a legal vacuum, these parents harbor deep hopes for what law will offer but simultaneously doubt that legal reforms will guarantee the rights and recognition they desire. For lesbian co-mothers, law and family are mutually constitutive practices oriented toward both the present and the future. Co-mothers make decisions about childbearing and family formation that take into account existing legal frameworks for family recognition, but their strategies for recognition also orient them toward future potentialities, posing the challenge of how to make decisions in the present without knowing for certain what might be legally possible in the future. The article concludes that lesbian co-mothers’ family strategies are productive as much as they are reactive; they not only diversify the norm but also potentially shift the very ground on which normativity is created.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"26 1","pages":"551 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-8978347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:This article analyzes the tension between marriage and family rights in the context of Taiwan’s marriage equality movement and the then-pending legalization of same-sex marriage following a 2017 Constitutional Court ruling. It focuses on the efforts of lesbian co-mothers to secure vital legal guarantees for the families they create through intentional childbearing. As pioneers who have formed families in a legal vacuum, these parents harbor deep hopes for what law will offer but simultaneously doubt that legal reforms will guarantee the rights and recognition they desire. For lesbian co-mothers, law and family are mutually constitutive practices oriented toward both the present and the future. Co-mothers make decisions about childbearing and family formation that take into account existing legal frameworks for family recognition, but their strategies for recognition also orient them toward future potentialities, posing the challenge of how to make decisions in the present without knowing for certain what might be legally possible in the future. The article concludes that lesbian co-mothers’ family strategies are productive as much as they are reactive; they not only diversify the norm but also potentially shift the very ground on which normativity is created.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婚姻权利会带来家庭平等吗?法律、女同志同母与台湾的认同策略
摘要:本文分析了在台湾婚姻平权运动的背景下,婚姻与家庭权利之间的紧张关系,以及2017年宪法法院裁决后同性婚姻合法化的背景。它关注的是女同性恋共同母亲的努力,为她们通过故意生育创建的家庭获得重要的法律保障。作为在法律真空中组建家庭的先驱者,这些父母对法律将提供的东西怀有深深的希望,但同时怀疑法律改革能否保证他们所渴望的权利和认可。对于女同性恋母亲来说,法律和家庭是面向现在和未来的相互构成的实践。共同母亲在作出有关生育和家庭组成的决定时,会考虑到现有的家庭承认法律框架,但她们的承认战略也会使她们考虑到未来的潜力,这就提出了一个挑战,即如何在不确定未来在法律上可能发生什么的情况下做出目前的决定。这篇文章的结论是,女同性恋同为母亲的家庭策略是富有成效的,也是被动的;它们不仅使规范多样化,而且潜在地改变了创造规范的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Contributors Contributors Editor's Introduction: Aesthetics of the Uncanny Daizō Sakurai's Trans-Asian Tent Theater, Picun, and the Reenchantment of Urban Space How to Create a New Workers' Culture Together: An Interview with Wang Dezhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1