Roundtable

S. Chatterjee, K. Grossman, R. Jobson, Kristen Kowlessar, River Rossi
{"title":"Roundtable","authors":"S. Chatterjee, K. Grossman, R. Jobson, Kristen Kowlessar, River Rossi","doi":"10.25158/l11.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This roundtable shares the first-hand experiences of five crip, disabled, Mad, and/or neurodivergent doctoral students navigating academia in so-called Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. While we discuss and theorize our experiences of ableism, structural oppression, and inaccessibility in the academy, we also highlight the world-building experiences of solidarity that have emerged for us in crip community, and in particular among fellow crip graduate students. We consider the ways that crip students open up potential for new ways of learning and being by challenging dominant norms of academic productivity, and we also consider what is lost when these students are pushed out of academic spaces. By engaging in 'collective refusal' of the conditions that harm disabled and otherwise marginalized students, new possibilities emerge for connection, community, and radical change. The virtual conversation transcribed here took place over Discord, email, and Google Docs in autumn of 2021 and early winter 2022. This piece embraces multi-tonality, that is, a range of different voices and ways of writing, speaking, and communicating. It is a conversational piece that intentionally blends varied approaches to knowledge-sharing: polemic, citationally-grounded, and personal anecdotes drawn from our diverse lived experiences. There are a number of different themes woven throughout the text, including anecdotes and personal history, solidarity, ableism in the academy, pessimism/failure, community/interdependence/intimacy, and utopia/futurity/demands for the future. While not intended to provide policy guidance or step-by-step instructions for changing academic culture, we also begin to sketch out some of our dreams for an alternative future for disabled scholars. We discuss imagined futures and possibilities, and ask, is a truly crip and/or accessible academic institution possible?\n","PeriodicalId":7777,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25158/l11.2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This roundtable shares the first-hand experiences of five crip, disabled, Mad, and/or neurodivergent doctoral students navigating academia in so-called Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. While we discuss and theorize our experiences of ableism, structural oppression, and inaccessibility in the academy, we also highlight the world-building experiences of solidarity that have emerged for us in crip community, and in particular among fellow crip graduate students. We consider the ways that crip students open up potential for new ways of learning and being by challenging dominant norms of academic productivity, and we also consider what is lost when these students are pushed out of academic spaces. By engaging in 'collective refusal' of the conditions that harm disabled and otherwise marginalized students, new possibilities emerge for connection, community, and radical change. The virtual conversation transcribed here took place over Discord, email, and Google Docs in autumn of 2021 and early winter 2022. This piece embraces multi-tonality, that is, a range of different voices and ways of writing, speaking, and communicating. It is a conversational piece that intentionally blends varied approaches to knowledge-sharing: polemic, citationally-grounded, and personal anecdotes drawn from our diverse lived experiences. There are a number of different themes woven throughout the text, including anecdotes and personal history, solidarity, ableism in the academy, pessimism/failure, community/interdependence/intimacy, and utopia/futurity/demands for the future. While not intended to provide policy guidance or step-by-step instructions for changing academic culture, we also begin to sketch out some of our dreams for an alternative future for disabled scholars. We discuss imagined futures and possibilities, and ask, is a truly crip and/or accessible academic institution possible?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆桌会议
本次圆桌会议分享了五名瘸子、残疾人、疯子和/或神经分化博士生在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在所谓的加拿大学术界导航的第一手经验。当我们讨论和理论化我们在学术界的残疾歧视、结构性压迫和难以接近的经历时,我们也强调了在残废社区中,特别是在残废研究生中,为我们出现的团结一致的世界建设经验。我们考虑到,弱智学生通过挑战学术生产力的主流规范,开辟了新的学习和生存方式的潜力,我们也考虑到,当这些学生被赶出学术空间时,我们失去了什么。通过参与“集体拒绝”伤害残疾和边缘化学生的条件,新的可能性出现了联系,社区和彻底的改变。这里记录的虚拟对话发生在2021年秋天和2022年初冬的Discord、电子邮件和b谷歌Docs上。这部作品包含了多调性,即一系列不同的声音和写作、说话和交流的方式。这是一篇对话式的文章,它有意地融合了各种知识共享的方法:辩论式的、以引文为基础的,以及从我们不同的生活经历中汲取的个人轶事。全书贯穿了许多不同的主题,包括轶事和个人经历、团结、学术界的残疾歧视、悲观/失败、社区/相互依存/亲密,以及乌托邦/未来/对未来的需求。虽然不打算为改变学术文化提供政策指导或一步一步的指导,但我们也开始勾勒出我们对残疾学者的另一种未来的一些梦想。我们讨论想象中的未来和可能性,并问,一个真正蹩脚和/或平易近人的学术机构是可能的吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Remote Access Canada’s Colonial Project Begins in Africa With Grief and Joy The Place and Pace to Remember Corona Look of the Day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1