Relação entre o ângulo quadriciptal (ÂQ) e a distribuição da pressão plantar em jogadores de futebol

R. G. Braz, G. Carvalho
{"title":"Relação entre o ângulo quadriciptal (ÂQ) e a distribuição da pressão plantar em jogadores de futebol","authors":"R. G. Braz, G. Carvalho","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552010005000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is an association between the Q-angle (Q) and the distribution of plantar pressure in football players, and to compare the characteristics of these athletes with non-practitioners of this sport. METHODS: 121 male participants were selected: 50 football practitioners (FP) and 71 non-practitioners (NP). We concurrently evaluated the Q-angle and the plantar pressure through the software of postural assessment (SPA) and the F-Mat System, respectively. To verify the correlation between the Q-angle and peak pressure values in four segments of the foot (medial and lateral forefoot, medium-foot and hind-foot), the Pearson coefficient (r) for parametric analysis was used. The independent t-test was used to compare these variables between the groups. Data normality was verified by the skewness values, adopting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A negative and weak correlation was found (r=-0.32) between the Q-angle and the plantar pressure in the right medium-foot. The groups differed with regards to the right Q-angle (11.36o in FP versus 13.80o in NP) and the left Q-angle (11.03o in FP versus 13.96o in NP). Plantar pressure was also different between the groups, with FP showing higher mean values for the right side and for the left side of the forefoot (0.77 kg/cm2 in FP versus 0.63 kg/cm2 in NP, and 0.65 kg/cm2 in FP versus 0.54 kg/cm2 in NP, respectively). However, mean peak pressure values for the left medium-foot were higher among NP (0.37 kg/cm2 in FP versus 0.46 kg/cm2 in NP). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of an association between the Q-angle and the distribution of plantar pressure in FP. The athletes showed reduced Q-angle values and higher mean peak pressure values for the right and left aspects of the forefoot, suggesting a varus malalignment and a supine distribution of plantar bases.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"16 1","pages":"296-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010005000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is an association between the Q-angle (Q) and the distribution of plantar pressure in football players, and to compare the characteristics of these athletes with non-practitioners of this sport. METHODS: 121 male participants were selected: 50 football practitioners (FP) and 71 non-practitioners (NP). We concurrently evaluated the Q-angle and the plantar pressure through the software of postural assessment (SPA) and the F-Mat System, respectively. To verify the correlation between the Q-angle and peak pressure values in four segments of the foot (medial and lateral forefoot, medium-foot and hind-foot), the Pearson coefficient (r) for parametric analysis was used. The independent t-test was used to compare these variables between the groups. Data normality was verified by the skewness values, adopting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A negative and weak correlation was found (r=-0.32) between the Q-angle and the plantar pressure in the right medium-foot. The groups differed with regards to the right Q-angle (11.36o in FP versus 13.80o in NP) and the left Q-angle (11.03o in FP versus 13.96o in NP). Plantar pressure was also different between the groups, with FP showing higher mean values for the right side and for the left side of the forefoot (0.77 kg/cm2 in FP versus 0.63 kg/cm2 in NP, and 0.65 kg/cm2 in FP versus 0.54 kg/cm2 in NP, respectively). However, mean peak pressure values for the left medium-foot were higher among NP (0.37 kg/cm2 in FP versus 0.46 kg/cm2 in NP). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of an association between the Q-angle and the distribution of plantar pressure in FP. The athletes showed reduced Q-angle values and higher mean peak pressure values for the right and left aspects of the forefoot, suggesting a varus malalignment and a supine distribution of plantar bases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足球运动员四头角与足底压力分布的关系
目的:确定足球运动员的Q角(Q)与足底压力分布之间是否存在关联,并比较这些运动员与非从事这项运动的运动员的特征。方法:选取121名男性受试者:50名足球运动员(FP)和71名非足球运动员(NP)。我们分别通过姿势评估软件(SPA)和F-Mat系统同时评估q角和足底压力。为了验证足部四个节段(前足内侧和外侧、中足和后足)的q角与峰值压力值之间的相关性,使用Pearson系数(r)进行参数分析。独立t检验用于组间比较这些变量。通过偏度值验证数据正态性,采用5%的显著性水平。结果:右中足q角与足底压力呈弱负相关(r=-0.32)。两组的右q角(FP组为11.36°,NP组为13.80°)和左q角(FP组为11.030°,NP组为13.96°)存在差异。两组之间的足底压力也不同,FP显示右侧和左侧前足的平均值更高(FP为0.77 kg/cm2,而NP为0.63 kg/cm2, FP为0.65 kg/cm2,而NP为0.54 kg/cm2)。然而,NP组左中足的平均峰值压力值更高(FP组为0.37 kg/cm2, NP组为0.46 kg/cm2)。结论:没有证据表明q角与足底压力分布之间存在关联。运动员前足左右两侧的q角值降低,平均峰值压力值升高,提示内翻错位,足底呈仰卧分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the use of Kinect technology as a therapeutic alternative to improve physical capacities in older adults Results of the application of pulmonary physiotherapy in a 38-year-old post-COVID19 patient after severe pneumonia and type 2 diabetes mellitus Application of neurohabilitation therapy in a six-month-old pediatric patient as a treatment for neurodevelopmental delay (clinical case) Estudio comparativo entre el índice de masa corporal y el control postural en alumnos sanos de la carrera de Terapia Física de la Universidad Politécnica de Pachuca Acompañamiento terapéutico para la aceptación o rechazo de una prótesis: Caso de paciente infantil con amputación de miembro superior izquierdo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1