PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS

Jan Ziekow
{"title":"PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS","authors":"Jan Ziekow","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2019.3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the brief overview of the procedure for enacting an administrative act it is stated that in the German understanding the administrative procedure with its inherent control mode, goal orientation and role of the various institutions and bodies as well as persons involved in the intermediary role between constitutional requirements and administrative reality is not purely technical one. The authority decides ex officio about the opening of the procedure except a citizen applied for, it decides at its discretion except when it must act ex officio how to proceed. Its important principles named as informality, simplicity, expediency, speed, obligation t o cooperate and freedom of form. Special importance is attributed to the principle of officiality of the investigation of a given case. The relevance of circumstances arises from the relevant legal norms and – i case of – discretionary decisions. The extent of the proof and the burden of proof are also important for the scope of the official investigation principle. Authorities are obliged to grant the citizen a right to be heard in the administrative procedure and to influence the course and outcome of the procedure. It carries direct and indirect external impact, revealing the basic understanding of relations between the state and the individual derived from the constitution. Equal treatment of all citizens and material substantivity proves the rule of law and prohibits the abuse of power at the expense of the citizen.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2019.3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the brief overview of the procedure for enacting an administrative act it is stated that in the German understanding the administrative procedure with its inherent control mode, goal orientation and role of the various institutions and bodies as well as persons involved in the intermediary role between constitutional requirements and administrative reality is not purely technical one. The authority decides ex officio about the opening of the procedure except a citizen applied for, it decides at its discretion except when it must act ex officio how to proceed. Its important principles named as informality, simplicity, expediency, speed, obligation t o cooperate and freedom of form. Special importance is attributed to the principle of officiality of the investigation of a given case. The relevance of circumstances arises from the relevant legal norms and – i case of – discretionary decisions. The extent of the proof and the burden of proof are also important for the scope of the official investigation principle. Authorities are obliged to grant the citizen a right to be heard in the administrative procedure and to influence the course and outcome of the procedure. It carries direct and indirect external impact, revealing the basic understanding of relations between the state and the individual derived from the constitution. Equal treatment of all citizens and material substantivity proves the rule of law and prohibits the abuse of power at the expense of the citizen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政行为的发布程序
在对行政行为制定程序的简要概述中指出,在德国人的理解中,行政程序及其内在的控制方式、目标取向和在宪法要求和行政现实之间扮演中介角色的各种机构和团体以及所涉及的人的作用并不是纯粹的技术问题。除公民申请外,机关依职权决定程序的开启;除必须依职权行事外,机关自行决定程序的开启。其重要原则有:不拘小节、简洁、方便、快捷、合作义务和形式自由。对某一案件的调查的官方原则具有特别的重要性。情况的相关性源于相关的法律规范和自由裁量决定。举证的范围和举证责任对官方侦查原则的适用范围也很重要。当局有义务给予公民在行政程序中发表意见的权利,并有权影响程序的过程和结果。它承载着直接和间接的外部影响,揭示了宪法对国家与个人关系的基本认识。对所有公民和物质实体的平等对待证明了法治,并禁止滥用权力损害公民的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOME ISSUES OF INSTANCE JURISDICTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS UNDER MARITAL LAW THE LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE: A BRIEF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS PECULIARITIES OF DETERMINING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE COUNCIL OF UKRAINE AS A SUBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THE LAW ON FOOD SECURITY OF UKRAINE AS A LEGAL BASIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE FIELD OF ENSURING FOOD SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1