Learner-centredness: A multiple intelligence approach to reveal individual learner preferences for curriculum content in Foundation Phase

Q1 Arts and Humanities Koers Pub Date : 2018-12-11 DOI:10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2218
C. Smith
{"title":"Learner-centredness: A multiple intelligence approach to reveal individual learner preferences for curriculum content in Foundation Phase","authors":"C. Smith","doi":"10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gardner’s multiple intelligences can directly link with the subjects or the curriculum taught in school. The focus in this paper is on Foundation Phase learners and their personal favourite subjects. In allowing learners to choose what they find the most interesting, the most popular subject is identified and new perspectives are provided on which areas should need attention. The method involved is a quantitative approach incorporating statistics obtained through a Likert scale. 105 participants were involved and interesting views surfaced. Literacy is no longer at the top of the list of most popular subjects, a concern for teachers who aim at teaching learners to read and write as Art is found to be the most popular subject. Fusing Art and other forms of intelligences can be employed as a strategy to teach literacy and popularise it.\n\nOpsomming\nGardner se onderskeid tussen multi-intelligensie tipes can direk in verband gebring word met die vakke wat op skool onderrig word. Die fokus in hierdie navorsingsstuk is op die Grondslagfase en die leerders se persoonlike gunsteling vakke. Nuwe lig op populêre vakke word gewerp deur leerlinge die geleentheid te bied om hulle persoonlike voorkeur uit te oefen. Hierdie metode stel navorsers instaat om vas te stel wat om te doen om die probleem van swak geletterdheid aan te spreek. ‘n Kwantitatiewe metode is gevolg om leerderkeuses te identifseer en resultate is in present weergegee. 105 deelnemers was betrokke en interessante perspektiewe het aan die lig gekom. Gelletterdheid is nie die gewildste vak nie en Kuns is een van die Grondslagfase leerders se voorkeure. Indien kuns dan ingespan kan word in ander vakke as deel van integrasie kan dit moontlik die leer in daardie vakke bevorder.","PeriodicalId":38057,"journal":{"name":"Koers","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gardner’s multiple intelligences can directly link with the subjects or the curriculum taught in school. The focus in this paper is on Foundation Phase learners and their personal favourite subjects. In allowing learners to choose what they find the most interesting, the most popular subject is identified and new perspectives are provided on which areas should need attention. The method involved is a quantitative approach incorporating statistics obtained through a Likert scale. 105 participants were involved and interesting views surfaced. Literacy is no longer at the top of the list of most popular subjects, a concern for teachers who aim at teaching learners to read and write as Art is found to be the most popular subject. Fusing Art and other forms of intelligences can be employed as a strategy to teach literacy and popularise it. Opsomming Gardner se onderskeid tussen multi-intelligensie tipes can direk in verband gebring word met die vakke wat op skool onderrig word. Die fokus in hierdie navorsingsstuk is op die Grondslagfase en die leerders se persoonlike gunsteling vakke. Nuwe lig op populêre vakke word gewerp deur leerlinge die geleentheid te bied om hulle persoonlike voorkeur uit te oefen. Hierdie metode stel navorsers instaat om vas te stel wat om te doen om die probleem van swak geletterdheid aan te spreek. ‘n Kwantitatiewe metode is gevolg om leerderkeuses te identifseer en resultate is in present weergegee. 105 deelnemers was betrokke en interessante perspektiewe het aan die lig gekom. Gelletterdheid is nie die gewildste vak nie en Kuns is een van die Grondslagfase leerders se voorkeure. Indien kuns dan ingespan kan word in ander vakke as deel van integrasie kan dit moontlik die leer in daardie vakke bevorder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学习者为中心:一种多元智能方法来揭示个体学习者对基础阶段课程内容的偏好
加德纳的多元智能可以直接与学校的科目或课程联系起来。本文的重点是基础阶段的学习者和他们个人最喜欢的科目。在允许学习者选择他们最感兴趣的内容时,确定了最受欢迎的主题,并为应该注意的领域提供了新的视角。所涉及的方法是一种定量方法,结合了通过李克特量表获得的统计数据。105名参与者参与其中,有趣的观点浮出水面。识字不再是最受欢迎的科目,这是那些旨在教学生阅读和写作的老师们所关心的,因为艺术被发现是最受欢迎的科目。融合艺术和其他形式的智能可以作为一种策略来教授识字和普及它。opsominggardner解释说,多智能类型的人可以在不同的时间点使用不同的单词,比如在学校使用不同的单词。在领导阶层中,人们关注的焦点是政治,而不是政治,甚至是政治领导人,他们都是像强盗一样的人。Nuwe light的词源为populêre,意为“新光”,意为“新光”,意为“新光”,意为“新光”。我的方法是让我的支持者们把我的名字和我的名字联系起来,因为我的名字和我的名字是一样的。量化方法是由管理者演化而来的,因为即使结果是在当前的环境中,标识符也会被看到。105个发展中国家的相互关系的观点是,我们有一个死亡的光。gelletterheidid是一个非常聪明的人,他是一个非常聪明的人,他是一个非常聪明的人。印度人在印度语中说的是一个词,在印度语中说的是一个词,在印度语中说的是一个词,在印度语中说的是一个词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Koers
Koers Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative Justice as a missional call in South African intercultural context and beyond. Habermas and the Caring Society: A Trans-disciplinary Feminist Critique The mis-appropriation of Abraham Kuyper’s ideas about “worldview” by American Evangelical Christians Gereformeerde pietisme, neoplatonisme en pre-Romantieke teodisee in die Voortrekkervrou Susanna Smit (1799-1863) se godsdienstige dagboeke Die rapportering van beserings in Meganiese Tegnologie-skoolwerkswinkels met die oog op die skep van `n geborgenheidsruimte vir die leerders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1