Strange Tensions

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1215/23289252-9612851
Quincy Meyers
{"title":"Strange Tensions","authors":"Quincy Meyers","doi":"10.1215/23289252-9612851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article analyzes the history of trans identities and intersex subjectivities to understand intersex and trans intercommunity relations and identify coalitional strategies. Citing Black and postcolonial studies scholars such as Riley C. Snorton and Zine Magubane, it concludes that trans identity and intersex subjectivity share a colonial racial history. Specifically, it builds on Snorton's “analysis of gender as a racial arrangement wherein the fungibility of captive flesh produced a context for understanding sex and gender as mutable and subject to rearrangement in medicine and law” to account for how the same racial arrangement of gender also formed intersex subjectivity. Trans identity and intersex subjectivity, then, have roots in colonialism and slavery, and the ungendering of Black flesh made interchangeable goods. This history has left a legacy of intercommunity tension in the form of whiteness. Consequently, addressing sex/gender as a racial arrangement is necessary to address tensions and build coalitions.","PeriodicalId":44767,"journal":{"name":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-9612851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the history of trans identities and intersex subjectivities to understand intersex and trans intercommunity relations and identify coalitional strategies. Citing Black and postcolonial studies scholars such as Riley C. Snorton and Zine Magubane, it concludes that trans identity and intersex subjectivity share a colonial racial history. Specifically, it builds on Snorton's “analysis of gender as a racial arrangement wherein the fungibility of captive flesh produced a context for understanding sex and gender as mutable and subject to rearrangement in medicine and law” to account for how the same racial arrangement of gender also formed intersex subjectivity. Trans identity and intersex subjectivity, then, have roots in colonialism and slavery, and the ungendering of Black flesh made interchangeable goods. This history has left a legacy of intercommunity tension in the form of whiteness. Consequently, addressing sex/gender as a racial arrangement is necessary to address tensions and build coalitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奇怪的紧张局势
本文分析了跨性别身份和双性人主体性的历史,以理解双性人和跨性别人在社区间的关系,并确定联合策略。引用黑人和后殖民研究学者如莱利·c·斯诺顿(Riley C. Snorton)和津·马古贝恩(Zine Magubane)的话,它得出结论,跨性别身份和双性人主体性共享殖民种族历史。具体来说,它建立在斯诺顿“将性别作为一种种族安排的分析之上,其中俘虏肉体的可互换性为理解性别和性别是可变的,并受制于医学和法律的重新安排提供了一个背景”,以解释性别的相同种族安排如何也形成了双性人的主体性。因此,跨性别身份和双性人主体性根源于殖民主义和奴隶制,黑人的非性别化造就了可互换的商品。这段历史以白人的形式留下了社区间紧张关系的遗产。因此,将性/性别作为一种种族安排来解决紧张关系和建立联盟是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Provincializing Trans Studies Staying Backward with the History of Camptown Trans Sex Work “For All the Queer NDN Foster Kids Out There” Whither Trans Studies? Jugando con lenguaje
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1