Unveiling the United States Acupuncture Workforce

S. Stumpf, M. Hardy, D. E. Kendall, C. R. Carr
{"title":"Unveiling the United States Acupuncture Workforce","authors":"S. Stumpf, M. Hardy, D. E. Kendall, C. R. Carr","doi":"10.1177/1533210110377884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acupuncture was first legalized in Maryland in 1973. By the end of 2009, regulatory legislation had passed in all but six states. The growth of acupuncture is most commonly measured by its well-documented demand as a treatment modality and the rapid increase in the number of licensees. Much less documented is a puzzling stagnation in work opportunities and income. As many as half of all licensees, on graduation and licensure, may be unable to support themselves by working in their chosen profession. However, unlike other well-established complementary and alternative health professions, such as chiropractic and massage, acupuncture is conspicuously absent from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics occupations manual, with only a handful of secondary and incomplete studies available, which together provide an inexact picture of the workforce. In this article, the authors review seven reports that provide limited information including hours worked, income, and practice type. Although data from these published articles are not standard, it can be reasonably concluded from the available information that, over the past decade, 50% of the licensed acupuncture (LAc) workforce is working less than 30 hr weekly; 50% are earning less than $50,000 on average; and the number of LAcs working independently in practice, either in their own office or sharing one, has increased from approximately 75% to 90%. Suggestions are presented for conducting a much needed comprehensive analysis of the acupuncture workforce.","PeriodicalId":10611,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Health Practice Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"31 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Health Practice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533210110377884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Acupuncture was first legalized in Maryland in 1973. By the end of 2009, regulatory legislation had passed in all but six states. The growth of acupuncture is most commonly measured by its well-documented demand as a treatment modality and the rapid increase in the number of licensees. Much less documented is a puzzling stagnation in work opportunities and income. As many as half of all licensees, on graduation and licensure, may be unable to support themselves by working in their chosen profession. However, unlike other well-established complementary and alternative health professions, such as chiropractic and massage, acupuncture is conspicuously absent from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics occupations manual, with only a handful of secondary and incomplete studies available, which together provide an inexact picture of the workforce. In this article, the authors review seven reports that provide limited information including hours worked, income, and practice type. Although data from these published articles are not standard, it can be reasonably concluded from the available information that, over the past decade, 50% of the licensed acupuncture (LAc) workforce is working less than 30 hr weekly; 50% are earning less than $50,000 on average; and the number of LAcs working independently in practice, either in their own office or sharing one, has increased from approximately 75% to 90%. Suggestions are presented for conducting a much needed comprehensive analysis of the acupuncture workforce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭秘美国针灸工作队伍
1973年,针灸在马里兰州首次合法化。到2009年底,除6个州外,所有州都通过了监管立法。针灸的增长最常见的衡量标准是其作为一种治疗方式的充分记录的需求和许可证数量的迅速增加。更少记录的是工作机会和收入的令人困惑的停滞。多达一半的持证人,在毕业和获得执照时,可能无法通过在他们选择的职业中工作来养活自己。然而,与其他完善的补充和替代健康职业(如脊椎按摩和按摩)不同,针灸在劳工和统计局的职业手册中明显缺席,只有少数次要和不完整的研究,这些研究提供了一个不准确的劳动力图景。在这篇文章中,作者回顾了七份提供有限信息的报告,包括工作时间、收入和练习类型。虽然这些已发表文章的数据并不标准,但从现有信息可以合理地得出结论,在过去十年中,50%的执业针灸(LAc)从业人员每周工作时间少于30小时;50%的人平均收入低于5万美元;在实践中独立工作的法律顾问人数,无论是在自己的办公室还是共用一间办公室,已经从大约75%增加到90%。建议提出进行一个非常需要的综合分析的针灸劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Meditation Teacher: A New Role for Health Professionals Vitamin B2: Riboflavin Does Vitamin E and C Supplementation Improve the Recovery From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery? Mythology of Antioxidant Vitamins? Folic Acid: Beyond Metabolism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1