Public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): acceptance of the impact

Q4 Social Sciences Revista Luna Azul Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.17151/luaz.2020.51.4
Héctor Damián Mosquera-Benítez
{"title":"Public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): acceptance of the impact","authors":"Héctor Damián Mosquera-Benítez","doi":"10.17151/luaz.2020.51.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of exploratory research related to the attributes assigned to environmental impacts, which followed a qualitative assessment methodology. This methodology is widely used in Colombia; however, a variable that represents the participation of the communities in the evaluation of the environmental impact is sought. The Colombian regulations and continuous legal sentences on prior consultation issues in black communities’ and indigenous reserve territories, as well as the collective characteristics of these properties, deserve the inclusion of a variable that measures public participation in the assessment of environmental impacts. Particularly in the Chocó territory, it is necessary to include an additional attribute apart from those required in the qualitative assessment (which can be extended to collective property territories throughout the country or globally) that represents the communities’ will. Therefore, the decision to carry out a project, work or activity is only made after consideration of a greater human approach and without discrediting other environmental factors involved in these areas, which are potentially sensitive to environmental effects. It was determined that the acceptability of projects and environmental impacts are part of the decision-making process made by the environmental authority, but communities are typically not considered. The possibility of obtaining community acceptability as a part of the methodology for assessing environmental impacts, that is, as a variable or additional attribute of an environmental impact assessment, has not been previously considered and makes this work novel.","PeriodicalId":37518,"journal":{"name":"Revista Luna Azul","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Luna Azul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2020.51.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the results of exploratory research related to the attributes assigned to environmental impacts, which followed a qualitative assessment methodology. This methodology is widely used in Colombia; however, a variable that represents the participation of the communities in the evaluation of the environmental impact is sought. The Colombian regulations and continuous legal sentences on prior consultation issues in black communities’ and indigenous reserve territories, as well as the collective characteristics of these properties, deserve the inclusion of a variable that measures public participation in the assessment of environmental impacts. Particularly in the Chocó territory, it is necessary to include an additional attribute apart from those required in the qualitative assessment (which can be extended to collective property territories throughout the country or globally) that represents the communities’ will. Therefore, the decision to carry out a project, work or activity is only made after consideration of a greater human approach and without discrediting other environmental factors involved in these areas, which are potentially sensitive to environmental effects. It was determined that the acceptability of projects and environmental impacts are part of the decision-making process made by the environmental authority, but communities are typically not considered. The possibility of obtaining community acceptability as a part of the methodology for assessing environmental impacts, that is, as a variable or additional attribute of an environmental impact assessment, has not been previously considered and makes this work novel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众参与环境影响评价(EIA):接受影响
本文介绍了采用定性评价方法对环境影响属性进行探索性研究的结果。这种方法在哥伦比亚广泛使用;但是,需要寻找一个代表社区参与评价环境影响的变量。哥伦比亚关于黑人社区和土著保留地事先协商问题的规定和持续的法律判决,以及这些财产的集体特征,都应该列入一个变量,以衡量公众参与评估环境影响。特别是在Chocó领土上,除了质量评估(可扩展到全国或全球的集体财产领土)所需的属性之外,有必要包括代表社区意愿的额外属性。因此,在决定是否进行一项项目、工作或活动时,必须考虑到更人性化的做法,而且不能贬低这些领域涉及的其他环境因素,因为这些因素可能对环境影响很敏感。确定项目的可接受性和环境影响是环境当局决策过程的一部分,但通常不考虑社区。获得社区可接受性作为评估环境影响方法的一部分的可能性,即作为环境影响评估的一个变量或附加属性,以前没有被考虑过,这使这项工作变得新颖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Luna Azul
Revista Luna Azul Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Luna Azul Journal is an organ of academic and refereed diffusion that publishes articles that address environmental or ecological issues, whether of scientific research or technological development, original reflections or revisions. The productions, reflections, analyzes and revisions can come from any of the scientific areas defined by the OECD, namely: Natural Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Medical and Health Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities. The journal is aimed at teachers and students of intermediate and higher educational levels, as well as at the executive and managerial levels of governmental bodies and environmental NGOs. The purpose of the Revista Luna Azul is to contribute to the dissemination of research results on ecological-environmental issues, with the aim of highlighting the interdisciplinarity and multidimensionality of the subject in question.
期刊最新文献
Los orígenes de la ideología del dominio humano sobre la naturaleza en Europa Análisis de los factores de riesgo que vulneran los derechos humanos de las mujeres mineras de subsistencia y de pequeña escala de oro: estudio de caso, California, Santander Valoración económica de bienes y servicios ecosistémicos del yacimiento “4” en el municipio Moa, provincia Holguín, Cuba Selección de instrumentos económicos para incentivar el reciclaje de residuos de la construcción y demolición Interpretación de la manera en que los agenciamientos artísticos movilizan los modos subjetivos del habitar de los integrantes del colectivo Al Ritmo de la Basura
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1