In search of social work's post-risk paradigm

Q3 Social Sciences Social Work and Social Sciences Review Pub Date : 2020-01-24 DOI:10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1281
Joe Smeeton
{"title":"In search of social work's post-risk paradigm","authors":"Joe Smeeton","doi":"10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a paradigmatic shift in child protection practice within the UK, arguing that there is a move away from the risk paradigm but that its replacement is not yet defined. The paper draws upon the critical literature to elucidate this shift and to give examples and arguments for why the risk paradigm is unsustainable and how this has created an essential tension within the profession. The paper finds that while the case against the risk perspective is strongly argued there is not yet a coherent perspective to replace it. The author suggests that this is problematic as practitioners are left with a toolkit of technical interventions to guide their practice but what is missing is the capacity to develop an ethic of practice due to a failure of social work in the UK to engage with philosophical questions about its remit. The paper concludes that social work education needs to focus more on ethical fluency rather than being stuck on statistical understandings of practice and policy in order to achieve a shift in paradigm from ‘risk’ to ‘ethics’.","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes a paradigmatic shift in child protection practice within the UK, arguing that there is a move away from the risk paradigm but that its replacement is not yet defined. The paper draws upon the critical literature to elucidate this shift and to give examples and arguments for why the risk paradigm is unsustainable and how this has created an essential tension within the profession. The paper finds that while the case against the risk perspective is strongly argued there is not yet a coherent perspective to replace it. The author suggests that this is problematic as practitioners are left with a toolkit of technical interventions to guide their practice but what is missing is the capacity to develop an ethic of practice due to a failure of social work in the UK to engage with philosophical questions about its remit. The paper concludes that social work education needs to focus more on ethical fluency rather than being stuck on statistical understandings of practice and policy in order to achieve a shift in paradigm from ‘risk’ to ‘ethics’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找社会工作的后风险范式
这篇论文描述了英国儿童保护实践中的一个范式转变,认为有一种远离风险范式的趋势,但其替代品尚未确定。本文借鉴了批判性文献来阐明这一转变,并举例和论证了为什么风险范式是不可持续的,以及这如何在行业内造成了本质的紧张关系。本文发现,虽然反对风险视角的案例被强烈争论,但还没有一个连贯的视角来取代它。作者认为,这是有问题的,因为从业者留下了一个技术干预工具包来指导他们的实践,但由于英国社会工作未能参与有关其职权范围的哲学问题,因此缺乏发展实践伦理的能力。本文的结论是,社会工作教育需要更多地关注道德流畅性,而不是停留在对实践和政策的统计理解上,以便实现范式从“风险”到“道德”的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Web-based mindfulness course for staff working in care homes in Wales for older people with dementia social inclusion of mental health service users in Brazil: Applying SCOPE-B scale Quality of life as a basis for system change Editorial: Celebrating the work of Peter Huxley Historical applications of the Goldberg and Huxley Pathway to Psychiatric Care Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1