Investigating the Effect of Blending MOOCs with Flipped Classroom on Engagement in Learning and Course Grades

Nahed F. Abdel-Maksoud
{"title":"Investigating the Effect of Blending MOOCs with Flipped Classroom on Engagement in Learning and Course Grades","authors":"Nahed F. Abdel-Maksoud","doi":"10.30560/IER.V2N2P8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though MOOCs are usually used as stand-alone online courses, more and more instructors are using them to complement their traditional lectures, others are using them to flip their classrooms. This study investigates the impact of MOOCs-based flipped classroom on engagement in learning and course grades. This quasi-experimental study employed post-test only control group design. Participants of the study consisted of 155 pre-service teachers studying the undergraduate \"EFL Teaching Methodology course at one of the universities in Egypt in the year 2018-2019. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental (flipped classroom) (N=78) or a control group (traditional) (N=77). Both groups were taught by the same instructor, the control group was taught in the traditional method, while the experimental group were required to enroll in two English Language Teaching MOOCs, assigned by the course instructor, and complete specific parts of each course, students had to watch videos, read articles, complete quizzes, and come to class prepared to discuss what they have read and watched, and complete in-class activities. Ten weeks later, the instrument of the study, Engagement Scale, was administered to both groups to assess their engagement in learning. Course grades were obtained from the instructor. Results showed that there were statistically significant differences in both engagement and course grades in favor of the ‎experimental group (flipped classroom group). Using MOOCs to flip traditional courses is found to improve students' engagement and learning, this is because students were able to use limited class time to engage in higher‐level interactive learning activities. There is no fear that technology or video lectures will replace faculty, rather it can make their teaching more effective. Integrating MOOCs and flipped classroom can harness technology to radically redesign teaching and learning experiences.","PeriodicalId":13729,"journal":{"name":"International Educational Scientific Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Educational Scientific Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30560/IER.V2N2P8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Though MOOCs are usually used as stand-alone online courses, more and more instructors are using them to complement their traditional lectures, others are using them to flip their classrooms. This study investigates the impact of MOOCs-based flipped classroom on engagement in learning and course grades. This quasi-experimental study employed post-test only control group design. Participants of the study consisted of 155 pre-service teachers studying the undergraduate "EFL Teaching Methodology course at one of the universities in Egypt in the year 2018-2019. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental (flipped classroom) (N=78) or a control group (traditional) (N=77). Both groups were taught by the same instructor, the control group was taught in the traditional method, while the experimental group were required to enroll in two English Language Teaching MOOCs, assigned by the course instructor, and complete specific parts of each course, students had to watch videos, read articles, complete quizzes, and come to class prepared to discuss what they have read and watched, and complete in-class activities. Ten weeks later, the instrument of the study, Engagement Scale, was administered to both groups to assess their engagement in learning. Course grades were obtained from the instructor. Results showed that there were statistically significant differences in both engagement and course grades in favor of the ‎experimental group (flipped classroom group). Using MOOCs to flip traditional courses is found to improve students' engagement and learning, this is because students were able to use limited class time to engage in higher‐level interactive learning activities. There is no fear that technology or video lectures will replace faculty, rather it can make their teaching more effective. Integrating MOOCs and flipped classroom can harness technology to radically redesign teaching and learning experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MOOCs与翻转课堂相结合对学习参与度和课程成绩的影响研究
尽管mooc通常被用作独立的在线课程,但越来越多的教师正在使用它们来补充他们的传统课程,还有一些人正在使用它们来颠覆他们的课堂。本研究探讨了基于mooc的翻转课堂对学生学习参与度和课程成绩的影响。本准实验研究采用后验对照组设计。该研究的参与者包括155名职前教师,他们于2018-2019年在埃及的一所大学学习本科“英语教学法”课程。参与者被随机分配到实验组(翻转课堂)(N=78)或对照组(传统)(N=77)。两组由同一位老师授课,对照组采用传统方法授课,实验组则需要参加两门由课程老师指定的MOOCs英语语言教学课程,并完成每门课程的特定部分,学生需要观看视频,阅读文章,完成小测验,并准备好上课讨论他们所阅读和观看的内容,并完成课堂活动。十周后,研究人员对两组学生使用参与量表来评估他们在学习中的参与程度。课程成绩是从导师那里取得的。结果显示,实验组(翻转课堂组)在参与度和课程成绩上都有统计学上的显著差异。人们发现,利用mooc颠覆传统课程可以提高学生的参与度和学习能力,这是因为学生能够利用有限的课堂时间参与更高水平的互动学习活动。没有人担心技术或视频讲座会取代教师,相反,它可以使他们的教学更有效。整合mooc和翻转课堂可以利用技术从根本上重新设计教学和学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Status of the French Language in North Africa The new Norwegian curriculum and integration of knowledge in textbooks in social studies: a comparative study How is Teachers’ Relational Competence Manifested in Online Higher Education Contexts? The Philosophy of Islamic education Based on Moderation Diversity in Indonesia Beyond Teaching and Learning - Rethinking Academic Development in Relation to Quality Enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1