Portfolio Based Language Assessment (PBLA) in Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) Programs: Taking Stock of Teachers' Experience

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-10-16 DOI:10.37213/cjal.2020.31121
Nwara Abdulhamid, Janna Fox
{"title":"Portfolio Based Language Assessment (PBLA) in Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) Programs: Taking Stock of Teachers' Experience","authors":"Nwara Abdulhamid, Janna Fox","doi":"10.37213/cjal.2020.31121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined seven Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) teachers’ accounts of current Portfolio Based Language Assessment (PBLA) practices, elicited through semi-structured interviews, in order to explore washback - the effects of PBLA on teaching and learning. Portfolios are primarily useful as formative assessment tools (i.e., informing teaching and learning) (Fox, 2014; Little, 2007); conversely, when used solely as summative tools (i.e., achievement measures), they can result in portfolio prisons, which undermine teaching and learning (Hargreaves et al., 2002). To investigate the washback effect of PBLA, data were qualitatively analyzed, synthesized, and merged in development of recurring themes (Charmaz, 2006). Findings suggest that PBLA may have had washback on both teaching and learning. However, teachers’ individual classroom situations determined the direction and intensity of reported PBLA washback. The study highlights leverage points (Fox, 2004) where interventions (e.g., additional support, resources) might address negative washback. ","PeriodicalId":43961,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2020.31121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined seven Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) teachers’ accounts of current Portfolio Based Language Assessment (PBLA) practices, elicited through semi-structured interviews, in order to explore washback - the effects of PBLA on teaching and learning. Portfolios are primarily useful as formative assessment tools (i.e., informing teaching and learning) (Fox, 2014; Little, 2007); conversely, when used solely as summative tools (i.e., achievement measures), they can result in portfolio prisons, which undermine teaching and learning (Hargreaves et al., 2002). To investigate the washback effect of PBLA, data were qualitatively analyzed, synthesized, and merged in development of recurring themes (Charmaz, 2006). Findings suggest that PBLA may have had washback on both teaching and learning. However, teachers’ individual classroom situations determined the direction and intensity of reported PBLA washback. The study highlights leverage points (Fox, 2004) where interventions (e.g., additional support, resources) might address negative washback. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大新移民(LINC)项目语言教学中的基于组合的语言评估(PBLA):评估教师的经验
本研究调查了7位加拿大新移民语言教学教师对当前基于组合的语言评估(PBLA)实践的描述,通过半结构化访谈得出,以探讨PBLA对教学和学习的反作用。作品集主要用作形成性评估工具(即为教学和学习提供信息)(Fox, 2014;少,2007);相反,当仅作为总结工具(即成就衡量标准)使用时,它们可能导致组合监狱,从而破坏教学(Hargreaves et al., 2002)。为了研究PBLA的反拨效应,在重复主题的发展过程中对数据进行了定性分析、综合和合并(Charmaz, 2006)。研究结果表明,PBLA可能对教学和学习都有反作用。然而,教师的个人课堂情况决定了报告的PBLA反冲的方向和强度。该研究强调了杠杆点(Fox, 2004),其中干预措施(例如,额外的支持,资源)可能会解决负面的反作用力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Évaluer la compréhension en lecture d’un récit et d’un texte informatif auprès d’élèves de 8 ans Review of Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. Cambridge University Press. Review of Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Teachers’ Perceptions Toward Video as a Tool for Feedback on Students’ Oral Performance English-Language Proficiency Requirements for Migration to Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and the Implications for Language Testing Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1