It takes two to code: a comparative analysis of collective bargaining and artificial intelligence

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1177/10242589231156515
O. Molina, Florian Butollo, C. Mako, A. Godino, Ursula Holtgrewe, Anna Illsoe, Sander Junte, T. Larsen, Miklós Illésy, Jószef Pap, Philip Wotschack
{"title":"It takes two to code: a comparative analysis of collective bargaining and artificial intelligence","authors":"O. Molina, Florian Butollo, C. Mako, A. Godino, Ursula Holtgrewe, Anna Illsoe, Sander Junte, T. Larsen, Miklós Illésy, Jószef Pap, Philip Wotschack","doi":"10.1177/10242589231156515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extension of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic management mechanisms by companies has led to growing trade union demands to regulate their use. This article explores the role of collective bargaining and employee participation mechanisms in regulating the use by companies of AI and algorithms. This is done through a comparative analysis of institutional developments at EU level, as well as in four countries with different industrial relations models (Denmark, Germany, Hungary and Spain). The article shows that there are remarkable differences between countries in the roles of social partners and in the combination of protective and participative mechanisms used to respond to the challenges of AI and algorithmic management. However, the analysis also serves to highlight the limits of existing institutions and practices to cope with the complexity of challenges associated with AI and algorithmic management. This calls for institutional adaptation and additional regulatory efforts at EU and national levels to support collective bargaining.","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"87 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231156515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The extension of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic management mechanisms by companies has led to growing trade union demands to regulate their use. This article explores the role of collective bargaining and employee participation mechanisms in regulating the use by companies of AI and algorithms. This is done through a comparative analysis of institutional developments at EU level, as well as in four countries with different industrial relations models (Denmark, Germany, Hungary and Spain). The article shows that there are remarkable differences between countries in the roles of social partners and in the combination of protective and participative mechanisms used to respond to the challenges of AI and algorithmic management. However, the analysis also serves to highlight the limits of existing institutions and practices to cope with the complexity of challenges associated with AI and algorithmic management. This calls for institutional adaptation and additional regulatory efforts at EU and national levels to support collective bargaining.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编码需要两个方面:集体谈判和人工智能的比较分析
企业对人工智能(AI)和算法管理机制的扩展,导致工会要求规范其使用的呼声日益高涨。本文探讨了集体谈判和员工参与机制在规范公司使用人工智能和算法方面的作用。这是通过对欧盟一级以及四个具有不同劳资关系模式的国家(丹麦、德国、匈牙利和西班牙)的制度发展进行比较分析来完成的。文章表明,在社会伙伴的角色以及用于应对人工智能和算法管理挑战的保护机制和参与机制的组合方面,各国之间存在显著差异。然而,该分析也有助于强调现有制度和实践在应对与人工智能和算法管理相关的挑战的复杂性方面的局限性。这就需要在欧盟和国家层面进行制度调整和额外的监管努力,以支持集体谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Governing neo-nationalism, trade unions and industrial relations: the cases of Hungary and Poland From a handful of activists towards an organising subculture: institutionalisation of transnational union organising in Central and Eastern Europe Round Table. Implementing the EU Directive on adequate minimum wages in the Low Countries: the case of the Netherlands Promoting employed worker status on digital platforms: how France’s labour inspection and social security agencies address ‘uberisation’ Internalising precariousness: experiences of Georgian platform workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1