The Medievalism of Emotions in King Lear

A. Czarnowus
{"title":"The Medievalism of Emotions in King Lear","authors":"A. Czarnowus","doi":"10.18778/2083-8530.23.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"King Lear exemplifies two cultures of feeling, the medieval and the early modern one. Even though the humoral theory lay at the heart of the medieval and the early modern understanding of emotions, there was a sudden change in the understanding of specific medieval emotions in Renaissance England, such as honour as an emotional disposition. Emotional expression also changed, since the late Middle Ages favoured vehement emotional expression, while in early modern England curtailment of any affective responses was advocated. Early modern England cut itself off from its medieval past in this manner and saw itself as “civilized” due to this restraint. Also some medieval courtly rituals were rejected. Expression of anger was no longer seen as natural and socially necessary. Shame started to be perceived as a private emotion and was not related to public shaming. The meaning of pride was discussed and love was separated from the medieval concept of charity. In contrast, in King Lear the question of embodiment of emotions is seen from a perspective similar to the medieval one. The article analyzes medievalism in terms of affections and studies the shift from the medieval ideas about them to the early modern ones.","PeriodicalId":40600,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Shakespeare-Translation Appropriation and Performance","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Shakespeare-Translation Appropriation and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.23.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

King Lear exemplifies two cultures of feeling, the medieval and the early modern one. Even though the humoral theory lay at the heart of the medieval and the early modern understanding of emotions, there was a sudden change in the understanding of specific medieval emotions in Renaissance England, such as honour as an emotional disposition. Emotional expression also changed, since the late Middle Ages favoured vehement emotional expression, while in early modern England curtailment of any affective responses was advocated. Early modern England cut itself off from its medieval past in this manner and saw itself as “civilized” due to this restraint. Also some medieval courtly rituals were rejected. Expression of anger was no longer seen as natural and socially necessary. Shame started to be perceived as a private emotion and was not related to public shaming. The meaning of pride was discussed and love was separated from the medieval concept of charity. In contrast, in King Lear the question of embodiment of emotions is seen from a perspective similar to the medieval one. The article analyzes medievalism in terms of affections and studies the shift from the medieval ideas about them to the early modern ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《李尔王》中情感的中世纪化
《李尔王》体现了两种情感文化,即中世纪和近代早期。尽管体液理论是中世纪和早期现代情感理解的核心,但在文艺复兴时期的英国,对特定中世纪情感的理解突然发生了变化,比如将荣誉视为一种情感倾向。情感表达也发生了变化,因为中世纪晚期倾向于激烈的情感表达,而在现代早期的英国,人们提倡减少任何情感反应。近代早期的英国就是以这种方式把自己与中世纪的过去割裂开来,并认为自己是“文明的”。一些中世纪的宫廷仪式也被拒绝了。愤怒的表达不再被认为是自然的和社会必需的。羞耻感开始被视为一种私人情感,与公开的羞耻感无关。他们讨论了骄傲的意义,把爱从中世纪的慈善概念中分离出来。相比之下,在《李尔王》中,情感的体现问题是从类似于中世纪的角度来看待的。本文从情感的角度分析了中世纪主义,研究了从中世纪到近代早期情感观念的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transformative Potential and Utopian Performative: Postdramatic Hamlet in Turkey “To Make Dark Heaven Light:” Transcending the Tragic in Sintang Dalisay An Interview with Stratis Panourios Utopia, Arcadia and the Forest of Arden From Race and Orientalism in A Midsummer Night’s Dream to Caste and Indigenous Otherness on the Indian Screen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1