Energy Efficient Steam-Based Hybrid Technologies: Modeling Approach of Laboratory Experiments

R. Pérez, H. García, D. Gutiérrez, Hector A. Rodriguez, S. Mehta, R. G. Moore, M. Ursenbach, B. Sequera-Dalton, E. Manrique
{"title":"Energy Efficient Steam-Based Hybrid Technologies: Modeling Approach of Laboratory Experiments","authors":"R. Pérez, H. García, D. Gutiérrez, Hector A. Rodriguez, S. Mehta, R. G. Moore, M. Ursenbach, B. Sequera-Dalton, E. Manrique","doi":"10.2118/209439-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Colombia is evaluating different steam-based hybrid oil recovery technologies as a strategy to face current challenges in the development of heavy oil reservoirs. Oil price volatility, the need for an energy transition, and carbon footprint reduction are factors limiting the commercial deployment of conventional steam injection projects. Ecopetrol evaluates the hybrid steam methods at laboratory scale as one of the different options to overcome current constraints developing heavy oil resources. The ongoing experimental program is supported by numerical modeling as a prior step to upscale the results at the pilot-scale.\n This study aims to present history match results and describe the numerical modeling approach of hybrid steam experiments (50 mm diameter × 1.1 m long assembly) and compare it against the baseline steam injection simulation. The first hybrid test involved the injection of steam and flue gas considering consecutive floods that included a saturated steam flood (SSF), a flue gas slug injection, and a second saturated steam flood. The second test was a steam and solvent injection following the same experimental protocol (SSF + solvent + SSF).\n The variables matched included produced fluids, pressures, produced gas compositions, and temperature profiles. One important feature is that all three models use the same set of water-oil relative permeability curves obtained from an independent experiment. Also, it was assumed those curves are not a function of temperature, which simplifies the modeling and allows focusing on the physical mechanisms relevant to each experiment. For instance, for the hybrid steam-flue gas test, it was necessary to include an additional set of gas-oil relative permeability curves to account for the presence of the flue gas in the gas phase. The hybrid steam-solvent test was focused on modeling the mixing of the native oil with the injected solvent. The proposed workflow led to a good history match of all variables, particularly total produced fluids, temperature profiles, and injection pressures. Additional recommendations are provided based on laboratory observations to understand important mechanisms such as trapped gas, relative permeability hysteresis, and solvent characteristics.\n A new methodology to simulate hybrid steam methods is provided. The proposed numerical approach incorporates novel energy efficiency and carbon intensity indexes to guide the decision-making and identify recovery strategies driven by its efficiency and reduce carbon footprint. Both hybrid tests led to energy efficiency improvements and reduction in carbon intensity up to 20%. These indexes combined with experimental results will be key input parameters for designing and commissioning future pilot tests using numerical simulations at the field scale.","PeriodicalId":10935,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, April 25, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, April 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209439-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colombia is evaluating different steam-based hybrid oil recovery technologies as a strategy to face current challenges in the development of heavy oil reservoirs. Oil price volatility, the need for an energy transition, and carbon footprint reduction are factors limiting the commercial deployment of conventional steam injection projects. Ecopetrol evaluates the hybrid steam methods at laboratory scale as one of the different options to overcome current constraints developing heavy oil resources. The ongoing experimental program is supported by numerical modeling as a prior step to upscale the results at the pilot-scale. This study aims to present history match results and describe the numerical modeling approach of hybrid steam experiments (50 mm diameter × 1.1 m long assembly) and compare it against the baseline steam injection simulation. The first hybrid test involved the injection of steam and flue gas considering consecutive floods that included a saturated steam flood (SSF), a flue gas slug injection, and a second saturated steam flood. The second test was a steam and solvent injection following the same experimental protocol (SSF + solvent + SSF). The variables matched included produced fluids, pressures, produced gas compositions, and temperature profiles. One important feature is that all three models use the same set of water-oil relative permeability curves obtained from an independent experiment. Also, it was assumed those curves are not a function of temperature, which simplifies the modeling and allows focusing on the physical mechanisms relevant to each experiment. For instance, for the hybrid steam-flue gas test, it was necessary to include an additional set of gas-oil relative permeability curves to account for the presence of the flue gas in the gas phase. The hybrid steam-solvent test was focused on modeling the mixing of the native oil with the injected solvent. The proposed workflow led to a good history match of all variables, particularly total produced fluids, temperature profiles, and injection pressures. Additional recommendations are provided based on laboratory observations to understand important mechanisms such as trapped gas, relative permeability hysteresis, and solvent characteristics. A new methodology to simulate hybrid steam methods is provided. The proposed numerical approach incorporates novel energy efficiency and carbon intensity indexes to guide the decision-making and identify recovery strategies driven by its efficiency and reduce carbon footprint. Both hybrid tests led to energy efficiency improvements and reduction in carbon intensity up to 20%. These indexes combined with experimental results will be key input parameters for designing and commissioning future pilot tests using numerical simulations at the field scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高效蒸汽混合动力技术:实验室实验的建模方法
哥伦比亚正在评估不同的蒸汽基混合采油技术,以应对当前稠油油藏开发面临的挑战。油价波动、能源转型需求和碳足迹减少是限制常规注汽项目商业部署的因素。Ecopetrol在实验室规模上评估了混合蒸汽方法,认为这是克服目前稠油资源开发限制的不同选择之一。正在进行的实验项目由数值模拟支持,作为中试规模结果升级的前一步。本研究旨在提供历史匹配结果,描述混合蒸汽实验(直径50 mm × 1.1 m长组件)的数值模拟方法,并将其与基线蒸汽注入模拟进行比较。第一次混合测试涉及注入蒸汽和烟气,考虑连续驱油,包括饱和蒸汽驱(SSF)、烟气段塞注入和第二次饱和蒸汽驱。第二次测试是按照相同的实验方案(SSF +溶剂+ SSF)进行蒸汽和溶剂注入。匹配的变量包括产出流体、压力、产出气体成分和温度分布。一个重要的特点是,这三种模型都使用了同一组从独立实验中获得的水-油相对渗透率曲线。此外,假设这些曲线不是温度的函数,这简化了建模,并允许将重点放在与每个实验相关的物理机制上。例如,对于混合蒸汽-烟气试验,有必要包括一组额外的气-油相对渗透率曲线,以解释气相中烟气的存在。蒸汽-溶剂混合试验的重点是模拟原生油与注入溶剂的混合。所提出的工作流程可以很好地匹配所有变量,特别是总产液、温度分布和注入压力。根据实验室观察提供了额外的建议,以了解重要的机制,如捕获气体,相对渗透率滞后和溶剂特性。提出了一种新的模拟混合蒸汽方法的方法。本文提出的数值方法引入了新的能效和碳强度指标,以指导决策,确定效率驱动的恢复策略,减少碳足迹。这两项混合测试都提高了能源效率,并将碳强度降低了20%。这些指标与实验结果相结合,将成为设计和调试未来在现场规模上使用数值模拟的中试试验的关键输入参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of Transmission Coefficient and Electric Field Distribution of Rice Husk/ Pcl Composites Using Finite Element Method for Microwave Devices Mechanical Properties Evaluation in Friction Stir Welding of Different Pipes The chemistry of aluminum salts in papermaking Comparative study of guar gum and its cationic derivatives as pre-flocculating polymers for PCC fillers in papermaking applications Ultrastructural behavior of cell wall polysaccharides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1