Static Dipole Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability of F2 from Density Functional Theory Calculations. Similarities and Dissimilarities with Conventional ab initio Results
{"title":"Static Dipole Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability of F2 from Density Functional Theory Calculations. Similarities and Dissimilarities with Conventional ab initio Results","authors":"G. Maroulis, C. Makris","doi":"10.1163/157404006778330825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have calculated the bond-length dependence of the static dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of F2 relying on finite-field density functional calculations. At the internuclear separation of Re = 2.66816 a0 we obtain α/e2a02Eh−1 = 8.73 (B3LYP) and 8.60 (B3PW91), Δα/ e2a02Eh−1= 6.42 (B3LYP) and 6.32 (B3PW91), γ/ e4a04Eh−3 = 535 (B3LYP) and 503 (B3PW91) with a large, flexible [9s6p4d1f] basis set. For all three properties we observe that both B3LYPand B3PW91 yield values above the more accurate CCSD(T) results: CCSD(T) < B3PW91 < B3LYP. The discrepancy between DFT and conventional ab initio methods is more pronounced for the anisotropy of the (hyper)polarizability.","PeriodicalId":101169,"journal":{"name":"Soft Computing Letters","volume":"56 1","pages":"131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soft Computing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157404006778330825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We have calculated the bond-length dependence of the static dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of F2 relying on finite-field density functional calculations. At the internuclear separation of Re = 2.66816 a0 we obtain α/e2a02Eh−1 = 8.73 (B3LYP) and 8.60 (B3PW91), Δα/ e2a02Eh−1= 6.42 (B3LYP) and 6.32 (B3PW91), γ/ e4a04Eh−3 = 535 (B3LYP) and 503 (B3PW91) with a large, flexible [9s6p4d1f] basis set. For all three properties we observe that both B3LYPand B3PW91 yield values above the more accurate CCSD(T) results: CCSD(T) < B3PW91 < B3LYP. The discrepancy between DFT and conventional ab initio methods is more pronounced for the anisotropy of the (hyper)polarizability.