Forcing and Calculi for Hybrid Logics

Daniel Găină
{"title":"Forcing and Calculi for Hybrid Logics","authors":"Daniel Găină","doi":"10.1145/3400294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition of institution formalizes the intuitive notion of logic in a category-based setting. Similarly, the concept of stratified institution provides an abstract approach to Kripke semantics. This includes hybrid logics, a type of modal logics expressive enough to allow references to the nodes/states/worlds of the models regarded as relational structures, or multi-graphs. Applications of hybrid logics involve many areas of research, such as computational linguistics, transition systems, knowledge representation, artificial intelligence, biomedical informatics, semantic networks, and ontologies. The present contribution sets a unified foundation for developing formal verification methodologies to reason about Kripke structures by defining proof calculi for a multitude of hybrid logics in the framework of stratified institutions. To prove completeness, the article introduces a forcing technique for stratified institutions with nominal and frame extraction and studies a forcing property based on syntactic consistency. The proof calculus is shown to be complete and the significance of the general results is exhibited on a couple of benchmark examples of hybrid logical systems.","PeriodicalId":17199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3400294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The definition of institution formalizes the intuitive notion of logic in a category-based setting. Similarly, the concept of stratified institution provides an abstract approach to Kripke semantics. This includes hybrid logics, a type of modal logics expressive enough to allow references to the nodes/states/worlds of the models regarded as relational structures, or multi-graphs. Applications of hybrid logics involve many areas of research, such as computational linguistics, transition systems, knowledge representation, artificial intelligence, biomedical informatics, semantic networks, and ontologies. The present contribution sets a unified foundation for developing formal verification methodologies to reason about Kripke structures by defining proof calculi for a multitude of hybrid logics in the framework of stratified institutions. To prove completeness, the article introduces a forcing technique for stratified institutions with nominal and frame extraction and studies a forcing property based on syntactic consistency. The proof calculus is shown to be complete and the significance of the general results is exhibited on a couple of benchmark examples of hybrid logical systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合逻辑的强制与演算
制度的定义形式化了基于范畴的逻辑直觉概念。同样,分层制度的概念为克里普克语义学提供了一种抽象的方法。这包括混合逻辑,这是一种具有足够表现力的模态逻辑,允许引用被视为关系结构或多图的模型的节点/状态/世界。混合逻辑的应用涉及许多研究领域,如计算语言学、转换系统、知识表示、人工智能、生物医学信息学、语义网络和本体。目前的贡献为开发正式验证方法奠定了统一的基础,通过在分层制度框架中定义大量混合逻辑的证明演算来推理克里普克结构。为了证明系统的完备性,本文引入了一种具有标称和框架抽取的分层制度强制技术,并研究了一种基于句法一致性的强制性质。在混合逻辑系统的几个基准算例上证明了证明演算的完备性和一般结果的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synchronization Strings: Codes for Insertions and Deletions Approaching the Singleton Bound The Reachability Problem for Two-Dimensional Vector Addition Systems with States Invited Articles Foreword On Nonconvex Optimization for Machine Learning Exploiting Spontaneous Transmissions for Broadcasting and Leader Election in Radio Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1