Causal Inference and Impact Evaluation

Q3 Social Sciences Economie et Statistique Pub Date : 2020-01-06 DOI:10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1996
D. Fougère, N. Jacquemet
{"title":"Causal Inference and Impact Evaluation","authors":"D. Fougère, N. Jacquemet","doi":"10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] This paper describes, in a non technical way, the main impact evaluation methods, both experimental and quasi experimental, and the statistical model underlying them. In the first part, we provide a brief survey of the papers making use of those methods that have been published by the journal Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics over the past fifteen years. In the second part, some of the most important methodological advances to have recently been put forward in this field of research are presented. To finish, we focus not only on the need to pay particular attention to the accuracy of the estimated effects, but also on the requirement to replicate evaluations, carried out by experimentation or quasi experimentation, in order to distinguish false positives from proven effects.","PeriodicalId":38830,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

[eng] This paper describes, in a non technical way, the main impact evaluation methods, both experimental and quasi experimental, and the statistical model underlying them. In the first part, we provide a brief survey of the papers making use of those methods that have been published by the journal Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics over the past fifteen years. In the second part, some of the most important methodological advances to have recently been put forward in this field of research are presented. To finish, we focus not only on the need to pay particular attention to the accuracy of the estimated effects, but also on the requirement to replicate evaluations, carried out by experimentation or quasi experimentation, in order to distinguish false positives from proven effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因果推理和影响评估
本文以一种非技术的方式描述了主要的影响评价方法,包括实验和准实验方法,以及它们背后的统计模型。在第一部分中,我们对过去15年来发表在《经济与统计》(Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics)杂志上的使用这些方法的论文进行了简要调查。在第二部分中,介绍了最近在这一研究领域提出的一些最重要的方法进展。最后,我们不仅关注需要特别注意估计效果的准确性,而且还关注通过实验或准实验进行的重复评估的要求,以区分假阳性和已证实的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economie et Statistique
Economie et Statistique Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Health-Consumption Effects of Increasing Retirement Age Late in the Game Financial Support for Young Adults Through Tax and Social Transfers – Defamilialisation Scenarios Inequalities of Opportunity in the Use of Healthcare by Young Adults in France Young People’s Decisions in the Transition to Adulthood in France: The Influence of Family Factors The Links between Saving Rates, Income and Uncertainty: An Analysis based on the 2011 Household Budget Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1