Perception of Consumers, Stakeholders, and Policy Makers on NAFDAC Anti-counterfeit Technologies and Interventions Regarding Counterfeit Drugs in Nigeria

Olakunle Daniel Olaniran
{"title":"Perception of Consumers, Stakeholders, and Policy Makers on NAFDAC Anti-counterfeit Technologies and Interventions Regarding Counterfeit Drugs in Nigeria","authors":"Olakunle Daniel Olaniran","doi":"10.21522/tijar.2014.10.03.art006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Counterfeiting medicines is a global phenomenon affecting developed and less developed countries. The World Health Organization, in its report, describes counterfeit medicines as becoming “a global public health crisis. This study examines consumers, stakeholders, and policymakers' perceptions of NAFDAC anti-counterfeit technologies and interventions regarding counterfeit drugs in Nigeria. This study uses a qualitative research method to examine consumers, stakeholders, and policymakers' perceptions of NAFDAC anti-counterfeit technologies and interventions regarding counterfeit drugs in Nigeria. Participants were selected using convenience sampling, and data was collected through an online interview. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Stakeholders emphasised the importance of NAFDAC having a comprehensive anti-counterfeiting strategy and implementing measures such as checking for NAFDAC registration numbers, inspecting packaging, and requesting seller receipts to identify genuine medicines. Policymakers at NAFDAC acknowledge the seriousness of the problem and recognise the roles of stakeholders in implementing anti-counterfeiting interventions. They emphasise the need for effective communication, engagement, and collaboration with healthcare professionals. Consumers express concerns about the accessibility to good quality medicines and the prevalence of substandard and counterfeit drugs. However, consumers also demonstrate a willingness to support NAFDAC's efforts and show a preference for quality medicines, which is a positive indicator for the Nigerian pharmaceutical industry. The findings underscore the importance of continuous efforts to raise awareness and implement effective anti-counterfeiting strategies to safeguard public health and combat the growing threat of fake drugs. Keywords: Falsified, Substandard, Counterfeit, Knowledge.","PeriodicalId":22213,"journal":{"name":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21522/tijar.2014.10.03.art006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Counterfeiting medicines is a global phenomenon affecting developed and less developed countries. The World Health Organization, in its report, describes counterfeit medicines as becoming “a global public health crisis. This study examines consumers, stakeholders, and policymakers' perceptions of NAFDAC anti-counterfeit technologies and interventions regarding counterfeit drugs in Nigeria. This study uses a qualitative research method to examine consumers, stakeholders, and policymakers' perceptions of NAFDAC anti-counterfeit technologies and interventions regarding counterfeit drugs in Nigeria. Participants were selected using convenience sampling, and data was collected through an online interview. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Stakeholders emphasised the importance of NAFDAC having a comprehensive anti-counterfeiting strategy and implementing measures such as checking for NAFDAC registration numbers, inspecting packaging, and requesting seller receipts to identify genuine medicines. Policymakers at NAFDAC acknowledge the seriousness of the problem and recognise the roles of stakeholders in implementing anti-counterfeiting interventions. They emphasise the need for effective communication, engagement, and collaboration with healthcare professionals. Consumers express concerns about the accessibility to good quality medicines and the prevalence of substandard and counterfeit drugs. However, consumers also demonstrate a willingness to support NAFDAC's efforts and show a preference for quality medicines, which is a positive indicator for the Nigerian pharmaceutical industry. The findings underscore the importance of continuous efforts to raise awareness and implement effective anti-counterfeiting strategies to safeguard public health and combat the growing threat of fake drugs. Keywords: Falsified, Substandard, Counterfeit, Knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者,利益相关者和政策制定者对尼日利亚NAFDAC防伪技术和假药干预措施的看法
假药是一种影响发达国家和欠发达国家的全球性现象。世界卫生组织在其报告中称假药正在成为“一场全球公共卫生危机”。本研究考察了尼日利亚消费者、利益相关者和政策制定者对NAFDAC防伪技术和假药干预措施的看法。本研究采用定性研究方法,考察尼日利亚消费者、利益相关者和政策制定者对NAFDAC防伪技术和假药干预措施的看法。研究对象采用方便抽样的方式进行选择,数据采用在线访谈的方式收集。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。利益相关者强调NAFDAC制定全面的打假战略和实施诸如检查NAFDAC注册号、检查包装和要求卖方收据以识别正品等措施的重要性。NAFDAC的决策者承认问题的严重性,并认识到利益相关者在实施反假冒干预措施中的作用。它们强调需要与卫生保健专业人员进行有效的沟通、参与和协作。消费者对优质药品的可及性以及伪劣药品的普遍存在表示关切。然而,消费者也表示愿意支持NAFDAC的努力,并表现出对优质药品的偏好,这对尼日利亚制药业来说是一个积极的指标。调查结果强调,必须继续努力提高认识并实施有效的打假战略,以保障公众健康并打击日益严重的假药威胁。关键词:伪造,不合格,伪造,知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Health System for Health Security: Case of Burundi Intimate Partner Violence in Nigeria: A Review of the Literature https://www.texilajournal.com/academic-research/article/2452-research-output-and The Essence of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Good Governance of Catholic Institutions in Zambia How the Learning Disabilities Cause Psychosocial Problems among children in South Sudan: A Case of Jamjang Refugee Camps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1