Evaluation of plant extracts for the management of Cercospora leaf spot of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

M. Neindow, E. Sowley, F. Kankam
{"title":"Evaluation of plant extracts for the management of Cercospora leaf spot of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)","authors":"M. Neindow, E. Sowley, F. Kankam","doi":"10.5897/AJPS2020.2029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a leguminous crop with high economic and nutritional value. However, increased production is hampered by Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) caused by Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum. Studies were conducted in vitro and in vivo to evaluate the efficacy of aqueous extracts of desert date seed (DDSE), neem seed (NSE), jatropha seed (JSE) and tobacco leaf (TLE) for the management of CLS. The antifungal activities of 25, 50, 75 and 100 g/l concentrations of each of the plant extracts was assessed in vitro on potato dextrose agar using the food poison technique. The field study was a factorial experiment consisting of 18 treatments laid in a Randomised Complete Block Design with four replications over two cropping seasons. The in vitro results revealed that all the botanicals at 100 g/l recorded the highest inhibition percentages. DDSE at 100 g/l significantly (P < 0.001) inhibited the highest mycelia growths compared to other levels of plant extracts used with inhibition percentages of 90.33 and 84.96% in C. arachidicola and C. personatum, respectively. Three out of the four aqueous extracts (DDSE, NSE and JSE) at 100 g/l significantly (P < 0.05) lowered disease incidence, severity and defoliation in the field and increased yield. Pod yield was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in plants treated with JSE, NSE, DDSE and Topsin-M, compared to those treated with TLE and the negative control plants. For most of the parameters, DDSE produced similar results as Topsin-M followed by NSE and JSE. Farmers can adopt DDSE, NSE and JSE as alternatives to fungicides leading to minimal effect on the environment since they are biodegradable.  \n \n   \n \n Key words: Cercospora leaf spot, plant extracts, groundnut, incidence, severity, aqueous.","PeriodicalId":7675,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Plant Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"443-450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2020.2029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a leguminous crop with high economic and nutritional value. However, increased production is hampered by Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) caused by Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum. Studies were conducted in vitro and in vivo to evaluate the efficacy of aqueous extracts of desert date seed (DDSE), neem seed (NSE), jatropha seed (JSE) and tobacco leaf (TLE) for the management of CLS. The antifungal activities of 25, 50, 75 and 100 g/l concentrations of each of the plant extracts was assessed in vitro on potato dextrose agar using the food poison technique. The field study was a factorial experiment consisting of 18 treatments laid in a Randomised Complete Block Design with four replications over two cropping seasons. The in vitro results revealed that all the botanicals at 100 g/l recorded the highest inhibition percentages. DDSE at 100 g/l significantly (P < 0.001) inhibited the highest mycelia growths compared to other levels of plant extracts used with inhibition percentages of 90.33 and 84.96% in C. arachidicola and C. personatum, respectively. Three out of the four aqueous extracts (DDSE, NSE and JSE) at 100 g/l significantly (P < 0.05) lowered disease incidence, severity and defoliation in the field and increased yield. Pod yield was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in plants treated with JSE, NSE, DDSE and Topsin-M, compared to those treated with TLE and the negative control plants. For most of the parameters, DDSE produced similar results as Topsin-M followed by NSE and JSE. Farmers can adopt DDSE, NSE and JSE as alternatives to fungicides leading to minimal effect on the environment since they are biodegradable.    Key words: Cercospora leaf spot, plant extracts, groundnut, incidence, severity, aqueous.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
花生叶斑病植物提取物防治效果评价
花生(arachhis hypogaea L.)是一种具有较高经济价值和营养价值的豆科作物。然而,花生尾孢子虫和人尾孢子虫引起的叶斑病(CLS)阻碍了产量的增加。通过体外和体内试验,评价了沙漠枣种子(DDSE)、印度楝籽(NSE)、麻疯树种子(JSE)和烟叶(TLE)水提物对CLS的治疗效果。采用食物毒法测定了25、50、75和100 g/l浓度的植物提取物对马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂的体外抑菌活性。田间研究是一项因子试验,包括18个处理,采用随机完全区组设计,在两个种植季节进行4次重复。体外实验结果显示,所有植物提取物在100 g/l时的抑制率最高。DDSE浓度为100 g/l时对花生绿僵菌菌丝生长的抑制率最高(P < 0.001),对花生绿僵菌和人僵菌的抑制率分别为90.33%和84.96%。100 g/l的DDSE、NSE和JSE水提液中有3种水提液显著(P < 0.05)降低了田间病害发生率、严重程度和落叶率,提高了产量。与TLE和阴性对照相比,JSE、NSE、DDSE和Topsin-M处理的荚果产量显著(P < 0.05)提高。对于大多数参数,DDSE的结果与Topsin-M相似,其次是NSE和JSE。农民可以采用DDSE、NSE和JSE作为杀菌剂的替代品,因为它们是可生物降解的,对环境的影响最小。关键词:麻孢叶斑病,植物提取物,花生,发病率,严重程度,水分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detached berries response to coffee berry disease (Colletotrichum kahawae) of F1 hybrid genotypes developed from Ethiopian accessions of Arabica coffee In vivo effect of cashew apple powder on fungi isolated from stored maize seed (EV8728-SR) Relationship between rice blast severity and the rice growth stage for accurate selection of rice breeding material for improved rice production in Africa Screening Sclerocarya birrea provenances on pests and diseases: A step towards domestication Distribution of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) root rot complex and associated pathogens in eastern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1